“LEADING WITH POSITIVITY: A PHENOMENOLOGICAL STUDY OF AFFECT AND LEADERSHIP EFFECTIVENESS” A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Global Leadership and Change under the guidance of a Faculty Committee and approved by its members has submitted to and accepted by the Read More
Visit the URL and place your order with us. Fill basic details of your research paper, set the deadlines and submit the form.
Chat with our experts to get the best quote. Make the payment via online banking, debit/credit cards or through paypal. Recieve an order confirmation number.
Sit back and relax. Your well written, properly referenced research paper will be mailed to your inbox, before deadline. Download the paper. Revise and Submit.
“LEADING WITH POSITIVITY: A PHENOMENOLOGICAL STUDY OF AFFECT AND LEADERSHIP EFFECTIVENESS”
A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Global Leadership and Change
under the guidance of a Faculty Committee and approved by its members has submitted to and accepted by the Graduate Faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of
Delimitations of the Study. 15
Different Types of Leadership Styles. 18
Chapter 2: Review of the Literature. 24
Background to the Problem.. 32
History of Studying Positive Affect 34
Current Trends in Research on Positive Affects. 46
Themes Related to the Relationship between Positive Affect and Leadership Styles. 54
Methods to Increasing Positive Affect 56
Themes of Past Literature Review Relevant to Dissertation Topic: 58
Chapter 3 Research Design and Methodology. 73
Re-Statement of Research Questions. 73
Protection of human subjects. 78
Reliability and validity of the study. 86
Statement of Personal Bias. 88
Describing, classifying, interpreting (coding) 92
ABSTRACT
The purpose of the study is to employ a qualitative phenomenological research design to investigate the relationship between positive affect and effective leadership. The research will involve conducting semi-structured interviews with a sample of 10 participants, drawn from various industries to ensure diverse population. The semi-structured interviews will allow for flexibility in exploring participants experiences, perceptions, behaviors, and positive affect in an organization. The interviews will be conducted using a predetermined set of open-ended questions, enabling participants to provide detailed and nuanced responses. The data collected from the interviews will be analyze using thematic analysis to identify key themes and patterns related to positive affect and leader’s effectiveness.
DEDICATION
To all educators who strive to provide the best resources to students to help them reach their true potential and become enlightened citizens and leaders for future generations. To my fiancé, who has served as an inspiration to me throughout this doctoral journey and as a guiding light of support and encouragement even during the most challenging of times. Also, to my parents, who have always motivated me to pursue my dreams, no matter how daunting, and to put faith in myself and God to aspire to excellence in all endeavors—and most importantly, never give up.
“Only those who will risk going too far can possibly find out how far one can go. We shall not cease from exploration, and the end of all our exploring will be to arrive where we started and know the place for the first time.” —T.S. Eliot
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to thank everyone who made this dissertation mission possible, from my mentors and family to my professors at Pepperdine University, whose guidance and support were instrumental in the completion of this research project.
Special thanks to my Dissertation Committee, Dr. Eric Hamilton, Dr. June Schmieder-Ramirez, and Dr. Lawrence Ledesma, for their inspiring leadership and tireless commitment to student success during this dissertation course. Their patience, guidance, and feedback were invaluable throughout the program, and their insight and generosity of spirit greatly encouraged my development through the dissertation process.
I would also like to thank the participants of this research study who so generously contributed to the project, offering their individual thoughts and expertise on Leading with Positivity: A Phenomenological Study of Affect and Leadership Effectiveness to provide insightful data for analysis. I thank them for sharing their valuable time and experiences with me, which greatly helped broaden the depth, scope, and significance of the study.
Much love and thanks to my fiancé Lorena, and family, who have been so essential to this dissertation journey. Without the love, patience, and support they provided over the last two years, this project would not have been possible.
VITA
EDUCATION
2024 Doctor of Education (PhD) Pepperdine University
Organizational Leadership and Change
2011 Masters of Clinical Psychology Pepperdine University
(M.A.) Master of Art
2001 Masters of Psychology Pepperdine University
(M.A.) Master of Art
1999 Bachelors of Behavioral Science Cal Polytechnic University
(B.A.) Bachelor of Art
PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
2019 to Present President
W Group Practice Corporation, Long Beach, CA
2011-2021 Psychotherapist
College Hospital, Anaheim, CA
2010 -2014. Administrator
E&V Adult Day Health Care, Compton, CA
2008- 2011 Assistant Program Manager
Westview Services, Inc., Westminster, CA
2008-2005 Production Manager
Chapter 1: Introduction
Leadership plays a vital role in shaping organization success in today’s complex and dynamic business environment. Leadership has been the focus of numerous studies, particularly given its pivotal role in the success and sustainability of organizations. Northouse (2016) describes leadership as a process whereby an individual influences a group of individuals to achieve a common goal. In professional settings, this influence becomes particularly intricate given the myriads of factors, including but not limited to, organizational culture, stakeholder expectations, and market dynamics. Kouzes and Posner (2012) emphasize that exemplary leadership is about modeling the way, inspiring a shared vision, challenging the process, enabling others to act, and encouraging the heart. Within professional contexts, these practices translate to not just having expertise in one’s domain, but also demonstrating ethical decision-making, fostering innovation, facilitating collaboration, and nurturing talent to ensure long-term success and growth.
As organizations strive for goals and navigate uncertainty, effective leadership becomes a necessary component for maintaining a competitive edge. While leadership has been studied extensively, there is little consensus on what it means to be a good leader. However, most research agrees that excellent leaders possess specific traits, including strong vision, emotional intelligence, and effective communication. Leadership is a multifaceted concept that encompasses the ability to influence and guide individuals and groups towards achieving common objectives. In the organizational context, effective leadership enables the alignment of individual efforts with organizational goals, fostering collaboration, motivation, and innovation. Research had consistently shown that effective leadership positively impacts various organizational outcomes, such as employee satisfaction, productivity, and overall organizational performance (Avolio, & Yammarino, 2013; Judge et al.,2009). Moreover, leadership is crucial for adapting change, managing crisis, and driving organizational transformation (Bass & Riggio, 2006; Yuki, 2013).
Over the years, countless theories and models have emerged to explain the concept of leadership and guide leadership practices. Trait theories suggest that certain inherent qualities, such as intelligence, confidence, and charisma, make individuals effective leaders (Judge et al, 2009). Behavioral theories focus on specific behaviors and actions of leaders that lead to positive outcomes (Bass & Riggio, 2006). Situational and contingency theories emphasize the importance of adapting leadership behaviors to match the situation and the need of followers (Yuki,2013). Transformational leadership theory of emphasizes the role of leaders in inspiring and motivating followers to transcend their self-interests for the greater good of the organization ((Avolio, & Yammarino, 2013). They inspire followers to embrace change, challenge the status quo, and achieve high levels of performance. This leadership style has been associated with increased employees’ satisfaction, commitment, and organizational innovation.
Transactional leadership focuses on a clear exchange between leaders and followers, where rewards and punishments are used to motivate performance. Transactional leaders emphasize goal setting, performance expectations, and contingent rewards for achieving targets (Bass & Riggio, 2006). Transactional leaders maintain order, monitor performance, and provide feedback to ensure adherence to established standards. While transactional leadership is effective in maintaining routine tasks and compliance, it may not be as effective in fostering creativity and intrinsic motivation.
Authentic leadership emerges as a predominant model accentuating the importance of a leader’s self-awareness, moral/ethical perspective, balanced processing, and transparent relationships (Walumbwa et al., 2008). According to George (2003), authentic leaders not only comprehend their own values and convictions but also demonstrate consistency between their values, beliefs, and actions. This leadership style necessitates a thorough understanding and regulation of the self, advocating for leaders who are self-aware and genuine in their interactions and decision-making processes. Authentic leaders are known for their ability to cultivate transparent, ethical, and trustworthy organizational climates, and they demonstrably influence follower satisfaction, performance, and overall organizational success (Ilies, Morgeson, & Nahrgang, 2005). The robust moral foundation apparent in authentic leaders provides a backbone for transparent, ethical decision-making and establishes a paradigm wherein leaders act in accordance with their deep-seated values and principles, even amidst challenges and sustainable growth.
Emotional intelligence (EI), a term that refers to an individual’s ability to recognize, understand, manage, and reason with emotions in oneself and others (Goleman, 1995). High levels of EI have been linked to better mental health, model job performance, and more effective leadership (Mayer, Roberts, & Barsade, 2008). The pertinence of EI in the realm of leader effectiveness is particularly significant, as it contributes to increased decision-making, conflict resolution, and the fostering of a positive work environment, all of which are critical for organizational success (Goldman, Boyatzis, & Mckee, 2002).
Previous studies have consistently demonstrated a significant association between positive affect and leader’s effectiveness among employees (Smith & Johnson, 2018, Anderson et al., 2020). Positive affect encompasses emotions such as joy, enthusiasm, and contentment, which plays a crucial role in shaping employee well-being, engagement, and job satisfaction. Additionally, the literature has emphasized the importance of leadership styles that promote supportive and empowering behaviors, as they have been linked to higher levels of positive affect among the followers (Robbins & Rodriquez, 2019, Thompson et al., 2021). However, further research is needed to explore the underlying method and boundary conditions of this relationship, considering factors such as cultural context, leadership development programs, and organizational structures.
Statement of the Problem
The challenges facing leaders today are multifaceted and range from economic uncertainty, geopolitical instability, technological disruption, and changing workforce demographics. Leaders must navigate these challenges while also ensuring that their organizations remain competitive, innovative, and sustainable. Therefore, it is essential to understand the challenges to being an effective leader today. One reason why being a leader today is difficult is the rapidly changing business landscape. Technological advancements, globalization, and shifting consumer preferences have altered the way organizations operate, and leaders must adapt to these changes quickly. This requires a willingness to embrace new technologies, business models, and ways of thinking, which can be challenging for leaders who are used to more traditional approaches.
Another reason being a leader today is difficult is the need to manage a diverse and multigenerational workforce. The challenges that a leader needs to overcomes is the complexity of human interactions. Leaders are required to navigate diverse personalities, perspectives, and motivations within their teams or organizations. Balancing the needs and expectations of individuals while aligning them towards common goals can be a formidable task (Eisenbeiss, Knippenberg, & Boerner, 2008). This complexity is further compounded by the dynamic nature of human behavior, which can be influenced by external factors, emotions, and interpersonal dynamics (Avolio, Walumbwa, & Weber, 2009).
Leaders often face complex and ambiguous situations where they are required to make critical decisions that can have far-reaching consequences for their organization or stakeholders. The pressure to make sound judgments amidst uncertainty and competing interests can be overwhelming (Yuki, 2010). Additionally, leaders are expected to demonstrate ethical decision-making, considering even unforeseen and long-term consequences and their impacts on various stakeholders (Yuki,2010). Today’s workforce is more diverse than ever, with individuals from different cultural backgrounds and generations, and with working styles. This requires leaders to be more flexible, open-minded, and attuned to the needs and ethics of their wider demographic employees. Leaders must also be able to manage the expectations and motivations of different generations, from Baby Boomers to Generation Z, and provide a work environment that is both challenging and rewarding for all employees. In managing all of these needs, leaders with positive affect maybe more effective in their leadership styles.
Optimistic leaders are typically more productive, innovative, and effective in their positions (Seligman, 2006). In addition, they create a workplace that is good for the growth and development of team members (Lencioni,2002). This results in more effective leaders who can inspire and guide their team to achieve its objectives. Positive leaders have a variety of characteristics that allow them to lead and motivate their teams to achieve success. Leaders who are effective is about having strong communication skills, emotional intelligence, and being great visionaries (Adler, R. B. & Elmhorst, J.M. 2010). They are also capable of inspiring others, making difficult decisions, and accepting all responsibility for the outcomes. Moreover, great leaders can build and maintain strong relationships, adjust to changing conditions, and lead through uncertainty.
Positive leaders can also cultivate a positive environment and influence others to reach their full potential. On the other hand, unhappy leaders reap the opposite results (Liu, Wang, and Wang 2019). Negative emotions such as anger, frustration, and discontent can result in unprofessional behavior, such as lashing out at employees, making disrespectful remarks, or engaging in unethical conduct. On the other hand, if a leader is emotionally stable, they may be able to maintain healthy boundaries. Furthermore, the role of a leader is to guide and motivate a team to achieve a common objective. Influential leaders establish clear goals, develop a vision for the company, and provide team members support and guidance to help them achieve success.
Happiness is often conceptualized within the domain of subjective well-being (SWB), which refers to how people experience the quality of their lives and include both emotional reactions and cognitive judgments. It encompasses a higher level of positive affect, a low level of negative affect, and a high degree of satisfaction with one’s life (Diener, 1984). Those who report higher happiness levels tend to enjoy better physical and mental health, more fulfilling relationships, and more satisfying careers. In recent years, positive affect leaders have gained popularity as research has demonstrated a correlation between leaders’ happiness and their workplace effectiveness. According to a study by Lyubomirsky, King, and Diener (2005), positive people tend to be more successful in their careers, including leadership positions. The positive affect leader tends to have a more optimistic outlook, which can result in improved decision-making, communication, and team relationships. In addition, Avey, Luthans, and Jensen (2009) discovered that positive psychological capital, including optimism and resiliency, is positively associated with leadership effectiveness.
George and Zhou (2002) found that team members reported greater job satisfaction and commitment levels when leaders exhibited positive emotions. Furthermore, this can lead to improved team productivity, performance, and a positive working environment. Being a positive leader does not imply ignoring or disregarding negative emotions or problems. However, Avolio, Walumbwa, and Weber (2009) established that transformational leaders who can balance positive and negative emotions are more effective than those who only exhibit positive emotions. Lastly, research has demonstrated that leaders with positive affect are more effective in their roles, implying that a leader needs to prioritize their overall well-being and emotional stability.
Purpose Statement
A substantial amount of research has been done in recent years on the complex and multifaceted relationship between positive affect and effective leadership. Positive affect is the experience of pleasant emotions such as joy, happiness, and enthusiasm. Effective leadership is the capacity to direct and influence others in accomplishing shared objectives (Fredrickson, B.L. (2001). There is still much to learn and understand about the relationship between positive affect and effective leadership, although it is well established. This study aims to explore the relationship between positive affect and leadership effectiveness. Using qualitative research techniques, this research will pinpoint how positive emotions might improve leadership effectiveness and results. This study will start by extensively evaluating the body of research on positive affect and leader’s effectiveness to identify the significant theories, and research gaps. This process entails thoroughly investigating reference lists and citation networks and a thorough search of pertinent databases, including Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar.
This study’s conceptual framework will direct our research design, data collection, and analysis and will be developed using the literature review. In addition to doing a literature study, we will speak with leaders from various industries to further investigate how positive affect influences their leadership effectiveness. The contribution of positive affect to improving leadership and organizational effectiveness will be examined in this study. The goal of the research is to add to the body of knowledge on positive affect and effective leadership by offering a more nuanced understanding of the underlying mechanisms and processes that connect these two dimensions. This study will shed light on the numerous organizational circumstances in which positive affect can support effective leadership. The research intends to provide useful insights for leaders and managers looking to improve their skills and results by understanding the precise ways that positive affect influences leadership skills.
There is a critical need for competent leadership across a range of businesses and organizations. There are not enough leaders in many organizations who can effectively improve their teams’ performance. The absence of competent leadership negatively impacts employee satisfaction, productivity, and attrition rates. Throughout all industries, there has been a recurrent issue with firms needing stronger leaders. The effects of poor leadership are especially pronounced in the healthcare industry. According to a PWC report, healthcare businesses struggle to find and keep successful leaders, which lowers employee satisfaction and morale among healthcare workers (PWC, 2018). In addition, a Deloitte study reveals that poor leadership is one of the main causes of low employee engagement, which leads to decreased productivity (Deloitte, 2021). Other industries are also plagued by the issue of inadequate leadership, which is more than just a concern in the healthcare sector. For instance, a significant issue in the tech sector is the need for qualified leaders who can lead diverse teams and encourage innovation. Businesses with diverse leadership teams perform better and are more inventive, according to a McKinsey study (McKinsey, 2020).
Positive affect has been shown to influence leadership effectiveness, team collaboration, and general workplace environment. Competent leadership often induces positive affect among team members, which is linked to increased productivity and collaboration. According to (Fredrickson, 2001) broaden-and-build theory, positive emotions can broaden one’s awareness and encourage novel, varied, and exploratory thoughts and actions. Leaders who can instill a sense of positive affect within diverse teams create more inclusive environments, which can lead to better performance and more innovation (Mckinsey, 2020).
The following research questions guided this study:
RQ 1: How does positive affect impact leadership effectiveness?
Assumption of the Study
This study assumes that leaders with positive affect significantly influence employee job satisfaction and organizational performance. It also presumes that leadership practices such as transformational leadership, transactional leadership, and authentic leadership have a distinct impact on employee’s attitudes and behaviors, leading to positive organizational outcomes. It assumes that the sample population represents a diverse range of industries and organizational sizes, allowing for generalizability of findings. Furthermore, it assumes that the participants’ responses are truthful, accurate, and the representative of their actual perceptions and experiences. By establishing these assumptions, this study aims to contribute to existing literature on professional leadership and provide insights that can inform leadership development initiatives and enhance organizational effectiveness.
Delimitations of the Study
This study acknowledges certain delimitations that help define the scope and boundaries of the research. First, the study focuses specifically on leadership within the content of medium-sized companies in the United States (Smith, 2017). By narrowing the scope by industry and organizational size, it recognizes that the findings might not be directly applicable to other industries or different-sized organizations. Second, the study solely examines the relationship positive affect and leadership styles without delving into to other factors that may influence these outcomes, such as organizational culture or external market conditions. These delimitations enable a more focused exploration of the direct impact of leadership styles on the specified variables. Furthermore, these delimitations help provide clarity on the specific boundaries and limitations of the study, ensuring the findings are interpreted within the defined context.
Limitations of the Study
It is important to acknowledge the inherent limitations of in this study. First, the sample population for this research consist of employees from a small set of industries. This limits the generalizability of the findings to other sectors or contexts (Johnson, 2019). Second, the study relies on self-report measures for data collection, which may introduce responses biases and social desirability effects. Additionally, the study primary focuses on professional leader’s styles and positive emotions, without exploring other potential factors that could influence organizational performance, such as team dynamics or external environmental factors. Finally, Creswell & Creswell (2017) note that the perspectives of participants in a location that might be different from the natural setting, such as home or school, and the researcher’s presence might result in biased responses ultimately limiting the study.
Significance of the Study
This purpose of study is to explore the phenomenon between the relationship between positive affect and effective leadership. Positive affect refers to the experience of positive emotions, such as happiness, joy, and contentment, which can significantly impact an individual’s well-being and behavior. On the other hand, Effective leadership refers to an individuals’ ability to lead and manage others in a professional setting. Therefore, understanding the relationship between positive affect and effective leadership is vital for individuals who aspire to become successful leaders. The research seeks to contribute to current literature and the training programs for effective leadership.
Theoretical Framework
There is an expanding body of research on the theoretical framework for positive emotions and effective leadership. Positive psychology, which focuses on understanding human strengths and well-being, is an integrated approach in this field. Positive psychology is the scientific study of the characteristics and virtues that enable individuals and communities to thrive, according to Seligman and Csikszentmihalyi (2000). Emotional intelligence is a key pillar in the study of positive feelings and effective leadership. The term “emotional intelligence” describes the capacity to identify, comprehend, and control one’s emotions and those of others (Goleman, 1995). As a result, those with emotional intelligence can better establish and manage relationships, communicate clearly, and exercise effective leadership. Self-determination theory (Deci & Ryan, 2000), which contends that people with positive emotions thrive most when they feel in control of their own lives and that they are making decisions that are in line with their values and interests, is a third crucial idea in this area of positive affect and leadership effectiveness.
Different Types of Leadership Styles
Leadership is the process by which superiors encourage a group of subordinates to work toward a common goal (Arrington, 2010). Moreover, the term “style” refers to a leader’s capacity to choose one leadership style over another in the hopes that the decision made will increase the organization’s and followers’ performance and capabilities (Arrington, 2010). Thus, preferred leadership style refers to a leader’s method of directing subordinates. Leadership styles, such as transformational, transactional, and authentic have been categorized and discussed in literature over the years. Those who follow a transformational leader are motivated to strive toward a cause, satisfy a higher need, and realize their potential (Horn- Turpin, 2009). An emphasis on exchanges, reinforcements, and power is a hallmark of a transactional approach, (Lopez-Zafra, Garcia-Retamero, and Berrios- Martos (2012). As a result, transactional leaders employ incentives, spending oversight, and expenditure management to achieve their goals.
The empirical connection between authentic leadership and psychological capitol within organizational contexts has gained substantial attention in leadership literature. Psychological capitol, encompassing elements like self-efficacy, hope, optimism, and resilience, serves as a pivotal aspect that mediates the relationship between authentic leadership and employee outcomes (Luthans, Youssef, & Avoilio, 2007). Authentic leaders, with their transparent, ethical, and consistent behavior, foster a work environment that helps to nurture these psychological capitol components among their followers. The transparency and moral/ethical dimensions of authentic leadership cultivate an environment where employees are inclined to develop trust and demonstrate increased levels of engagement, thereby positively influencing their psychological states and well-being.
Different types of leadership styles that impact positive affect: Transformational Leadership
Positive affect leaders, who exhibit enthusiasm, optimism, and positive emotions, can be successful at leading with transformational style (Bono, J.E., & IIies, R. 2006). Transformational leadership involves inspiring and motivating followers to achieve extraordinary outcomes by fostering growth, stimulating innovation, and creating a sense of collective purpose. Positive leaders possess the ability to generate enthusiasm and optimism, which can energize and engage their followers, enhancing their commitment, creativity, and performance. (Bono, Foldes, Vinson, & Muros (2007) found that leaders who displayed positive affect were perceived as more transformational by their subordinates, leading to higher levels of job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Therefore, positive affect leaders can be effective in leading with transformational style, facilitating positive outcomes for the followers and organizations. Furthermore, positive affect leaders create a climate of trust and psychological safety, these leaders enable their followers to feel valued, empowered, and motivated to contribute their best efforts. Finally, researchers have demonstrated that transformational leaders who exhibit positive affect and establish a supportive environment have a notable impact on performance and satisfaction (Dvir, Eden, Avolio, & Shamir (2002). Thus, the combination of positive affect and transformational leadership enhances the leader-follower relationship, resulting in positive outcomes for both individuals and the organization.
Different types of leadership styles that impact positive affect: Transactional Leadership
Positive impact leaders can utilize transactional leadership effectively. Transactional leadership entails a transactional exchange between leaders and followers, where rewards and punishments are used to motivate and guide performance. While positive impact leaders primarily emphasize transformational leadership, they recognize the value of transactional elements to address specific tasks and performances expectations. These leaders understand that transactional approaches, such as setting clear goals, providing feedback, and recognizing achievements, can help form a structured and accountable work environment. Judge & Piccolo (2004) supports the idea that leaders who exhibit positive affect can effectively implement transactional leadership behaviors. The researchers found that positive affect leaders were more likely to use contingent reward strategies, which involve rewarding followers for meeting performance standards. This combination of positive affect and transactional leadership allows leaders to maintain task-oriented focus while still infusing positivity and support into their interactions with followers.
Different types of leadership styles that impact positive affect: Authentic Leadership
Positive affect pertains to the experience of pleasant emotions such as joy, enthusiasm, and contentment (Watson, Clark, & Tellegen, 1988). Empirical studies have highlighted its role in promoting cognitive flexibility, creativity, and interpersonal skills—traits which align closely with effective leadership. Authentic leadership, as proposed by Avolio, Gardner, Walumbwa, Luthans, and May (2004), encompasses four main components: self-awareness, relational transparency, balanced processing, and an internalized moral perspective. Research has indicated that leaders with a higher frequency of positive affective experiences are more likely to exhibit authentic leadership behaviors. This connection can be attributed to the increased self-awareness and self-regulation capabilities that positive affect promotes, enabling leaders to remain genuine, transparent, and morally anchored in their actions (Gardner, Fischer, & Hunt, 2009). Additionally, the fostering of positive emotions within organizational settings can indirectly facilitate the development and recognition of authentic leadership. Followers perceiving leaders as authentic tend to feel a greater sense of trust, job satisfaction, and dedication to their tasks (Ilies, Morgeson, & Nahrgang, 2005). The cyclical nature of positive affect means that leaders who exhibit positive emotions can generate a contagion effect, uplifting the overall morale and emotional well-being of their teams, thereby reinforcing the link between positive affect and authentic leadership behaviors (Sy, Côté, & Saavedra, 2005).
Definition of Key Terms
Chapter Summary
Positive affect and effective leadership are critical elements that have been found to be associated with organizational success. It has been demonstrated that positive affect, which includes pleasant emotions, moods, and feelings, plays a key role in the leadership effectiveness of professionals in a variety of disciplines (Fredrickson, 2001). This research paper provides an overview of the literature on positive affect and leadership effectiveness, exploring how positive affect influences leadership behaviors and outcomes Positive affect correlates with effective leadership is through its impact on decision-making. It has been demonstrated that experiencing positive emotions fosters cognitive flexibility, creativity, and the capacity to weigh multiple viewpoints (Isen, Daubman, & Nowicki, 1987).
Effective leadership requires these cognitive processes because they allow leaders to make informed judgments and consider their followers’ various requirements and viewpoints. Another way positive affect also affects interpersonal interactions, which is another way in which it is connected to effective leadership. Improved social abilities, likeliness, and higher emotional intelligence have all been associated with positive affect (Barsade, 2002). These qualities are crucial for leaders who must manage complicated social dynamics and forge enduring bonds with their subordinates, colleagues, and stakeholders. Through its effects on motivation and job satisfaction, positive affect is also connected to leadership effectiveness. When leaders are motivated to attain their goals, they are more likely to be engaged in their work, feel more satisfied with their jobs, and more effective (Grant, 2008). This drive is crucial for effective leadership because it helps leaders to motivate and equip their followers to accomplish common objectives. However, it is crucial to remember that there are nuances in the relationship between positive affect and effective leadership.
While decision-making, interpersonal relationships, and motivation have all been positively associated with sound effects, there are also circumstances in which positive affect can negatively damage a leader’s ability to lead (Bono & Ilies, 2006). For instance, leaders who are too upbeat may come off as untrustworthy or unable to accept difficult realties. Because of this, leaders must strike a balance between their capacity for optimism and their awareness of the difficulties they face. In conclusion, having a good attitude is crucial for effective leadership. It has been demonstrated to affect motivation, relationships with others, and decision-making, which are crucial for leadership effectiveness. Therefore, leaders should aim for a balance that enables them to lead with both positivity and reality, while also being mindful of the possible drawbacks of an excessively positive influence.
Organization of the Study
This study has been organized in five chapters. In Chapter 2, a comprehensive literature review discusses theoretical approaches as it pertains to positive affect and effective leadership. The Chapter will also provide empirical research on the effectiveness leadership and positive affect. Chapter 3 outlines methodological procedures, including research design, population, sample, sampling procedures, human subject considerations, measures and data collection, procedures, and analytical techniques. Chapter 4 reports the results generated for each research question as it pertains to this study. Chapter 5 discuses key findings and recommendations for future studies.
Chapter 2: Review of the Literature
This literature review will address the relationship between positive affect and effective leadership. The qualitative study explores the subjective experiences and perspectives of leaders who display high levels of positive affect and leadership effectiveness. The research will use in-depth interviews and observations to gather rich, detailed data on the experiences and perspectives of participants to provide a more nuanced understanding of the impact of positive affect and leadership effectiveness. The findings from this study will contribute to the comprehensive literature on the relationship between positive affect and effective leadership and may advise the development of interventions and strategies to foster positive affect in leadership. Positive affect, encompassing positive emotions, moods, and feelings, can be a significant factor in the leadership effectiveness of professionals across various fields.
Understanding this relationship is important for individuals seeking to improve their leadership skills and organizations seeking to develop effective leaders. The literature review will be organized into several sections and subsections. The first section will provide an overview of positive affect and its relevance to leadership. This will include a discussion of the different types of positive affect and how they have been measured in the literature. In addition, the section will also address the role of positive affect in organizational contexts, including its impact on employee well-being and job performance. The second section will focus on the relationship between positive affect and effective leadership. This will discuss how positive affect influences decision-making, interpersonal relationships, and motivation, which are essential for effective leadership. This segment will also address the potential downsides of overly positive affect, including the risk of appearing disingenuous or lacking in credibility.
This section will also address the potential limitations of positive affect as a predictor of leadership success, including the importance of other factors such as expertise, experience, and situational variables. The third section will summarize the key findings from the literature review and their implications for leadership practice. Furthermore, this section will also identify areas for future research and potential avenues for further exploration of the relationship between positive affect and leadership effectiveness. The literature review will be conducted using a systematic approach to ensure a thorough literature review on the relationship between positive affect and effective leadership. The search terms will be adapted and refined to ensure their relevance to the research question.
Key Terms
Positive Affect & Leadership Styles. Positive affect refers to the extent to which an individual experiences positive moods and emotions. It is characterized by feelings of happiness, enthusiasm, and alertness. Positive affect is not just the absence of negative emotions but is an independent construct that represents the overall level of positive engagement and energy experienced by an individual (Watson, Clark, & Tellegen, 1988).
Leadership Styles
Transformational Leadership. Transformational leadership is a style where leaders inspire and motivate their followers to exceed their own self-interests for the good of the organization. They achieve this by raising followers’ awareness of the importance of their tasks, inducing them to transcend their own self-interest for the sake of the organization or team, and activating their higher-order needs (Bass, 1985).
Transactional Leadership. Transactional leadership is based on a system of exchanges between leaders and followers. Leaders provide resources or rewards in exchange for followers’ services and performance. This style is characterized by contingent reward and management by exception, where leaders intervene only when standards are not met (Bass & Avolio, 1990).
Authentic Leadership: Authentic leadership is a style where leaders are deeply aware of their values and beliefs, are self-aware, and act in accordance with their true self. This leadership approach emphasizes building the leader’s legitimacy through honest relationships with followers which value their input and are built on an ethical foundation. Authentic leaders are known for their transparency, ethics, and self-awareness, and they are driven by a strong sense of purpose (George, 2003; Avolio & Gardner, 2005).
Emotional Well-Being & Leadership Effectiveness. Emotional well-being is defined as the overall positive state of one’s emotions, life satisfaction, sense of fulfillment, and positive functioning. It encompasses the balance of positive emotions like happiness and contentment, as well as the management or absence of negative emotions such as depression or anxiety. Ryff’s model of psychological well-being, which includes aspects like self-acceptance, personal growth, and purpose in life, also contributes significantly to the understanding of emotional well-being (Ryff, 1989).
Leadership Effectiveness. Leadership effectiveness refers to a leader’s ability to achieve desired outcomes, such as team or organizational goals, through the process of influencing others. This effectiveness is often assessed by the leader’s capacity to guide their followers towards the achievement of these goals, create a motivating environment, and respond adaptively to changing situations. Effective leadership is not just about achieving results but also about fostering team development, employee satisfaction, and sustainable organizational growth. Yukl’s integrative model of leadership effectiveness, which includes aspects like task-oriented behavior, relation-oriented behavior, and change-oriented behavior, provides a comprehensive view of what constitutes effective leadership (Yukl, 2006).
Positive Emotions & Leadership. Positive emotions are those feelings that are generally associated with a positive affective state. These emotions include joy, gratitude, serenity, interest, hope, pride, amusement, inspiration, awe, and love. They are characterized by an increase in energy, attention, and focus. According to Barbara Fredrickson’s broaden-and-build theory, positive emotions broaden an individual’s momentary thought-action repertoire, which in turn helps to build their personal resources, ranging from physical and intellectual resources to social and psychological ones (Fredrickson, 1998, 2001).
Leadership. Leadership is the process of influencing others to understand and agree about what needs to be done and how to do it, and the process of facilitating individual and collective efforts to accomplish shared objectives. In the context of organizations, leadership involves establishing a clear vision, sharing that vision with others so that they will follow willingly, providing the information, knowledge, and methods to realize that vision, and coordinating and balancing the conflicting interests of all members and stakeholders. A leader steps up in times of crisis and can think and act creatively in difficult situations (Yukl, 2010).
Mood & Leadership. Mood refers to a more persistent emotional state compared to emotions. Moods are less intense than emotions and often do not have a specific identifiable trigger. Unlike emotions, which are reactions to specific events, moods can last for hours or even days. Moods can be positive or negative and influence perception, decision-making, and behavior. They are diffused affective states that can, subtly or overtly, color one’s psychological environment (Frijda, 1994). The interplay between mood and leadership, particularly how a leader’s mood impacts decision-making, communication, and overall effectiveness, is a well-established concept in organizational psychology. The researcher explores the concept of emotional intelligence in leadership. She highlights how leaders’ emotions, encompassing both transient moods and more intense, discrete emotions, can significantly influence their behavior and effectiveness. Leaders in positive moods are more likely to engage in behaviors that are beneficial for the organization, such as demonstrating flexibility in thinking, being more open to information, and exhibiting effective interpersonal skills. Conversely, leaders experiencing negative moods may show limitations in these areas, leading to poorer decision-making and communication. (George, J. M. 2000).
Employee Well-Being & Effective Leadership. Employee well-being refers to the overall mental, physical, and emotional health of employees in a workplace. It encompasses various aspects such as job satisfaction, work-life balance, stress management, and emotional safety. Employee well-being is linked to higher productivity, lower absenteeism, and reduced workplace conflict. A holistic approach to employee well-being includes organizational support for personal and professional development, a positive work environment, and resources to maintain physical and mental health (Warr, 1999).
Effective Leadership. Effective leadership is characterized by the ability of a leader to achieve desired outcomes and objectives through influencing, motivating, and guiding others. Effective leadership involves setting a clear vision, inspiring and empowering team members, fostering a positive work environment, and adapting to change. An effective leader balances task accomplishment with relationship building and is adept at managing diverse teams and situations. Leadership effectiveness is often measured by the leader’s impact on team or organizational performance and the well-being and development of team members (Yukl, 2013). Effective leadership is often associated with qualities like emotional intelligence, decision-making skills, and the ability to motivate and inspire others. Bass and Bass’s handbook on leadership theory and research provides a comprehensive overview of various facets of leadership (Bass & Bass, 2008).
Optimism & Leadership. Optimism is a psychological attribute characterized by the general expectation that good things will happen, or the belief that the future holds positive outcomes. Optimists typically maintain a positive outlook on life and approach challenging situations with the expectation of success. The concept of optimism has been significantly explored in positive psychology, where it’s associated with various beneficial outcomes like better health, higher resilience, and effective stress management. Scheier and Carver’s theory of dispositional optimism highlights this attribute as a stable personality trait influencing various life domains (Scheier & Carver, 1985). Leadership is the process of influencing others towards the achievement of goals. It involves setting a vision, inspiring and guiding individuals or groups to reach that vision and managing the dynamic organizational environment effectively. Leadership encompasses various styles and approaches, each suited to different situations and individual characteristics.
Emotional Intelligence & Leadership. Emotional Intelligence (EI) is the ability to recognize, understand, and manage our own emotions, as well as to recognize, understand, and influence the emotions of others. According to Salovey and Mayer, who first conceptualized the term, EI encompasses four domains: perceiving emotions, using emotions to facilitate thinking, understanding emotions, and managing emotions. This concept suggests that individuals with high EI are better equipped to navigate social complexities, regulate behavior, make personal decisions that achieve positive results, and help others do the same (Salovey & Mayer, 1990).
The relationship between emotional intelligence and leadership is extensively studied in organizational psychology. Leaders with high emotional intelligence are often more effective as they possess the skills to understand and manage their own emotions and those of others. This capability enables them to communicate more effectively, manage stress, resolve conflicts, and lead teams with empathy and understanding. Emotional intelligence is increasingly recognized as a critical component in effective leadership, as it contributes to building trust, fostering team cohesion, and enhancing overall organizational performance (Goleman, D. (1998).
Positive Leadership. Positive leadership refers to a leadership style that emphasizes the development and empowerment of individuals and organizations through affirmative and strengths-based approaches. This style of leadership focuses on fostering positive emotions, developing positive relationships, enabling positive communication, and nurturing a positive climate within teams and organizations. Positive leadership is grounded in positive organizational scholarship, which underscores the importance of positivity in enhancing employee well-being, productivity, and organizational success. Key components of positive leadership include fostering hope, resilience, optimism, and mindfulness among team members. Positive leaders not only aim to achieve organizational goals but also strive to enhance the well-being and personal growth of their followers (Cameron, Dutton, & Quinn, 2003).
Resilience Leadership. Resilience Leadership is a leadership approach that emphasizes adaptability, recovery, and growth in the face of challenges and adversity. It involves the capacity to maintain or regain high levels of performance and well-being during or following significant disruptions. Resilience leaders are skilled at navigating through uncertainty and setbacks, maintaining a positive outlook, and inspiring their teams to do the same. They cultivate a culture of resilience by encouraging flexibility, learning from failures, and promoting psychological safety. This style of leadership is particularly important in today’s fast-paced and often unpredictable business environment. Resilience in leadership is not just about bouncing back from adversity but also about learning, growing, and becoming stronger through these experiences (Luthans, 2002; Sutcliffe & Vogus, 2003).
Positive Affect & Decision-Making in Leadership. Positive affect refers to the experience of pleasant emotions and moods such as joy, enthusiasm, satisfaction, and contentment. It is a key component of emotional well-being and is characterized by a state of high energy, full concentration, and pleasurable engagement. Positive affect enhances cognitive processes, including creativity, problem-solving abilities, and decision-making skills. It broadens an individual’s thought-action repertoire, leading to more innovative and flexible thinking (Fredrickson, 2001).
Decision-Making in Leadership. Decision-making in leadership refers to the process by which leaders select a course of action among several alternatives to achieve a desired objective. Effective decision-making is crucial in leadership and involves critical thinking, judgment, and the ability to foresee the consequences of different choices. Leaders must consider various factors, including organizational goals, ethical implications, resource constraints, and stakeholder interests. Positive affect can significantly influence this process, as it is linked to enhanced cognitive functioning, greater openness to information, and increased creativity, which are all vital for sound decision-making (Isen, 2001).
To ensure the comprehensiveness of the literature review, the search strategy will be complemented by a manual search of the reference lists of identified articles and book chapters. The quality of the sources will be assessed based on the rigor of the research methods used, the validity and reliability of the findings reported, and the source’s relevance to the research question. This assessment will be conducted to ensure that the literature review presents a balanced and objective analysis of the research on the relationship between positive affect and leadership styles. The main takeaways from the literature review and their implications for leadership practice will be summarized in the last section.
The section will also suggest areas for further study and possible directions for expanding the connection between positive emotion and effective leadership. They will be modified and improved to ensure that the search phrases are pertinent to the research subject. The validity and dependability of the findings given, the relevance of the source to the research topic, and the rigor of the research methodologies utilized will all be considered while evaluating the sources. To make sure that the literature evaluation provides a fair and impartial overview of the studies on the connection between positive affect and leadership effectiveness, this assessment will be carried out.
Background to the Problem
The relationship between positive affect and leadership effectiveness has been a topic of interest for several decades, with research on this topic evolving. Historically, early leadership theories primarily concentrated on the leader’s characteristics. For example. trait theory emphasized inherent traits such as intelligence, self-confidence, and charisma as determinants of effective leadership (Stogdill, 1948). Behavioral theory, on the other hand, shifted the focus towards specific behaviors and styles, arguing that effective leadership is not just about who you are but also how you act (Lewwin, Lippit, & White, 1939). However, in recent years, there has been a growing interest in the role of positive affect in leadership and its impact on organizational outcomes (Bono & Judge, 2003).
Positive affect, defined as the experience of positive emotions, moods, and feelings (Watson, Clark, & Tellegan, 1988) has been shown to play a crucial role in shaping leader behavior and effectiveness (George,2000; Bono & IIies, 2006). Positive affect encompasses a wide range of positive emotional states that contribute to individual’s overall well-being and subjective happiness. (Fredrickson, 1988; Lyubomirsky, King, & Diener, 2005). In addition, positive emotion is characterized be feelings of pleasure, engagement, and enthusiasm, and it plays a vital role in shaping one’s thought, behaviors, and social interactions (Fredrickson, 2001; Watson, Clark, & Tellegen,1988).
Understanding the definition of the positive affect is essential for comprehending its impact on various aspects of human life, including relationships, work, and overall psychological functioning (Fredrickson, 2001; Watson, Clark, & Tellegen, 1988). Research has emphasized the importance of positive affect in promoting positive outcomes in individuals, such as improved mental health, better workplace performance, and enhanced interpersonal relationships (Lyubomirsky, King & Diener, 2005; Isen, Daubman, & Nowicki, 1987). For instance, Fredrickson’s broaden-and-build theory posits that positive affect broadens individuals’ cognition and behavioral repertoires, allowing them to explore new possibilities and build personal resources over time (Fredrickson, 2001).
Positive affect not only enhances individuals’ psychological well-being but also promotes physical health and resilience. Researchers have identified that leaders who exhibit positive affect are more likely to be viewed as charismatic, effective, and transformational. This may lead to increased follower motivation, satisfaction, and performance. Additionally, positive affect can foster the development of high-quality leader-follower relationships and facilitate effective communication and collaboration. Despite the expanding collection of research on the connection between positive affect and leadership effectiveness, there still needs to be more in the literature. Research on the potential disadvantages of positive affect and leadership, such as the possibility of overconfidence and a lack of critical thinking, is also necessary (Grant & Schwartz, 2011; Forgas, 1998). While positive affect can contribute to creativity and cooperative behavior, it may also lead to risky decision-making and neglect of potential pitfalls (Kernis, 2003; Clore, Schwarz, & Conway, 1994).
We can create more effective leaders and promote positive organizational results as we continue to get a deeper understanding of the connection between positive affect and leadership effectiveness. Although the body of knowledge regarding the connection between positive affect and effective leaders has expanded recently, many research gaps remain. Application to various organizational contexts is another area where the literature on the link between positive affect and effective leadership needs to be revised. The results of most of the current study cannot be applied to other contexts because it was mainly carried out in Western cultures and within specific sectors.
History of Studying Positive Affect
This section provides an overview of the historical development of positive affect research, highlighting key milestones and influential theories that have shaped our understanding of this important aspect of human psychology. Philosophers have long been interested in positive affect, the experience of positive emotions and moods. The goal of the research on positive affect is to understand how positive feelings and experiences might influence a person’s well-being and favorable outcomes. The history of positive affect research is covered in this section, along with early studies on happiness, the rise of positive psychology, contemporary trends in the field, and an understanding of various leadership philosophies.
The study of positive affect traces back to early philosophical and psychological inquiries. Positive affect was studied in the Socratic era as a vital component of well-being and a path to eudaimonia, or human flourishing. Greek philosophy and constructive impact Eudaimonia were key notions in well-being discussions in ancient Greek philosophy. Philosophers such as Aristotle and Epicurus explored the nature of happiness and the pursuit of a good life. Aristotle stated, “Happiness is the meaning and the purpose of life, the whole aim and end of human existence (as cited in Seligman 2002, P. 161). Socrates felt that living a virtuous life—necessitating generating pleasant effects—was the only way to experience true happiness. Socrates believed a positive impact was required to inspire others to pursue virtue and overcome unpleasant emotions like fear and anger. In his theory of eudaimonia, Aristotle also stressed the significance of positive affect, contending that virtuous activities were pleasurable, and that pursuing pleasure was a normal aspect of human life.
Positive Affect and Modern Positive Psychology Greek philosophers’ theories have influenced modern positive psychology’s investigation of positive affect. Positive psychology says nurturing good emotions can promote life satisfaction and resilience. Positive affect is seen as a crucial component of well-being. Interventions in positive psychology, like gratitude journals and mindfulness meditation, seek to boost good feelings and advance well-being. Good feelings and general well-being several facets of well-being have been proven to benefit from positive affect. According to research, those with higher levels of positive affect have had better physical health, more life satisfaction, and more stress resilience. Relationships that are more satisfying and have stronger social bonds have also been connected to positive affect. Emotions like joy, happiness, and contentment define an emotional condition known as positive affect.
Early psychologists began examining the nature of pleasant emotions in the early 1900s when positive affect research began. Early psychologists like William James, who developed the idea that emotional experiences might be broken down into three parts—bodily sensations—is responsible for developing early studies on positive affect. Emotional responses and a situation’s cognitive assessment (James,1890). James argued that positive emotions, such as joy and love, have adaptive functions and contribute to overall well-bring (James,1884). Many psychological theories of positive affect arose in the middle of the 20th century. The emergence of humanistic psychology marked a significant shift towards understanding the positive aspects of the human experiences. Scholars like Abraham Maslow and Carl Rogers focused on the study of self-actualization and the realization of human potential. Maslow proposed a hierarchy of needs, with self-actualization and personal on the top, emphasizing the importance of positive affect in fulfilling one’s potential (Maslow, 1954). Rogers emphasized the role of positive affect and empathy in fostering growth and self-fulfillment (Rogers, 1951).
Martin Seligman, a psychologist who contributed to the growth of the discipline of positive psychology, played a significant role in the 1960s research on positive affect. Seligman’s research centered on the elements that affect human happiness and well-being, and he claimed that experiencing joy and happiness is essential to living a happy life. The establishment of positive psychology as a unique field of study, which has expanded to include a wide range of research topics and applications, was made possible by Seligman’s work on positive affect. Happiness was the main topic of early studies on positive affect. Psychologists started investigating the factors that affect happiness and subjective well-being in the 1970s (Diener, Suh, Lucas, & Smith, 1999).
The set-point theory, which argued that everyone has a predefined degree of happiness that is difficult to change, was one of the most important theories in the study of happiness (Lyubomirsky, Sheldon, & Schkade, 2005). However, later study has demonstrated that various factors, including genetics, living circumstances, and deliberate behaviors, can influence happiness (Diener et., 1999). The field of positive psychology developed in the late 1990s as a branch of psychology devoted to the study of positive feelings and well-being (Seligman & Csikszentmihalyi, 2000). In positive psychology, empirical research on positive affect flourished in the late 20th century. Researchers started looking at the variables that affect our ability to feel well and how those feelings affect our overall well-being. According to a mathematical model of human flourishing put forth by (Fredrickson & Losada, 2005), people must experience a certain proportion of good to negative emotions to thrive. In the PERMA model, the five key elements of well-being consist of positive emotions, engagement, relationships, meaning, and accomplishment (Seligman, 2011). Positive feeling is the first part of the PERMA model. Among other things, positive feelings include happiness, satisfaction, and thankfulness. According to the author, positive emotions are a crucial sign of well-being and are linked to multiple advantages for physical and mental health (Seligman 2011).
According to research, those who feel good emotions more often have stronger immune systems, less stress, and better cardiovascular health (Fredrickson, 2001). Positive feelings are also connected to higher happiness and life satisfaction (Diener, Lucas, & Oishi, 2002). Engagement is the second element of the PERMA model. Being involved in demanding and meaningful tasks is referred to as engagement. This can apply to hobbies, employment, and social activities. According to research, participating in demanding and meaningful activities can raise well-being and boost creativity and performance (Csikszentmihalyi, 1990). Also, actively participating people report better happiness levels and greater life satisfaction (Kahneman, Krueger, Schkade, Schwarz, & Stone, 2004).
Relationships make up the PERMA model’s third element. The relationships part of the PERMA model highlights the significance of social support and connection because they are crucial for well-being. According to this study, those with strong social ties have better physical health and higher levels of life satisfaction (Umberson & Montez, 2010). Relationships can also give people a feeling of purpose and meaning and act as a buffer against stress and negative life occurrences (Baumeister & Leary,1995). Meaning is the fourth element of the PERMA model. Significance is typically connected to one’s values and beliefs and relates to a sense of purpose and direction in life. According to Frankl, those who feel their lives have no purpose are more prone to stress and misfortune (1959). In addition, a sense of purpose has been linked to higher life satisfaction, better mental health, and general well-being (Steger, Frazier, Oishi, & Kaler, 2006).
Seligman’s PERMA model, in conclusion, offers a helpful framework for comprehending the crucial elements of well-being. The PERMA model provides a complete strategy for boosting well-being and happiness by emphasizing positive emotion, engagement, relationships, meaning, and accomplishment. The PERMA model has been used to develop interventions and behaviors targeted at enhancing well-being across various populations, from people to organizations, using empirical research. In general, positive psychology aimed to reorient psychology’s emphasis away from the study of mental disorders and pathology and toward examining good traits and experiences (Seligman & Csikszentmihalyi, 2000). However, in positive psychology, gratitude, forgiveness, optimism, and resilience are fundamental ideas in positive psychology (Seligman, Steen, Park, & Peterson, 2005).
According to (Fredrickson, 2001) the broaden-and-build theory it suggests that positive emotions broaden individuals’ thoughts-action repertoires and build resources, leading to enhanced well-being and increased resilience. Fredrickson’s theory highlights the adaptive functions of positive affect and its role in promoting psychological and physical health. Fredrickson stated, “positive emotions transform people in lasting ways, helping them to become better versions of themselves” (2009, p. 6). Positive affect research has contributed to the understanding of flourishing and well-being. Scholars have explored the components of well-being, such as hedonic well-being (experiencing pleasure and positive emotions) and eudaimonia well-being (living a purposeful and meaningful life).
Research has shown that positive affect is the key contributor to overall well-being and life satisfaction. Diener and Seligman (2004) state, “positive affect is one key components of subjective well-being and plays a crucial role in people’s overall assessment of their lives” (p. 62). Emotional contagion refers to phenomenon where emotions are transferred from one person to another through non-verbal cues, facial expressions, and other forms of social mimicry. The concept has significant implications for understanding the influence of positive affect on interpersonal relationships and group dynamics. Studies have provided compelling evidence for the occurrence of emotional contagion in interpersonal interactions. For example, Barsade (2002) conducted research on emotional contagion in the workplace and found that individuals can catch the emotions of others, leading to similar emotional experiences within groups or teams. The study highlighted the importance of emotional contagion, stating that “emotional contagion represents an important way in which affect is spread throughout organizations and ultimately influences organizational effectiveness” (Barsade, 2002, p. 645).
Positive affect is particularly relevant to emotional contagion as it has shown to have a stronger impact compared to negative affect. Research suggests that positive emotions are more contagious and have a greater influence on others’ emotions and behaviors. Barsade (2002) stated, “positive emotions are more contagious than negative emotions and have a stronger effect on others’ emotions” (p. 653). Positive affective displays by leaders can create a positive emotional environment within teams, fostering positive emotional experiences, and enhancing overall group cohesion. According to Barsade (2002) “Positive affect in leaders led to positive affect among followers and increased in cooperation and positive interactions among group members” (p. 654). Additionally, Barsade (2002) emphasized the importance of leaders’ affective displays, stating that “leaders can create a positive contagion by expressing positive affect through enthusiasm, optimism, and warmth” (p. 663). However, while emotional contagion can have positive effects, it’s essential to consider ethical implications. Emotional contagion should not be used manipulatively or to exploit the emotions of individuals. Leaders should maintain authenticity and genuine care for their team members’ well-being.
Theoretical Foundation
An emerging topic of organizational psychology study has been the connection between positive affect and effective leadership. Various theoretical frameworks can be used to support research on this relationship. According to Fredrickson (2001), positive emotions broaden and build the theory of happy emotions, expand people’s thought-action repertoires, and increase their resources. Hence, leaders with positive affect may be able to think imaginatively, come to wise conclusions, and cultivate a good rapport with subordinates. Bass and Avolio’s transformational leadership theory is another interesting theoretical framework for investigating this link (1994). Transformational leaders encourage and inspire their people to pursue objectives beyond self-interest. Good affect may improve transformative leadership by fostering a pleasant workplace culture and enhancing leaders’ emotional expressiveness, charisma, and optimism.
The relationship between positive affect and leadership effectiveness can be theoretically supported by the self-determination theory put forth by (Deci & Ryan,1985). According to this idea, people have inherent psychological requirements for relatedness, competence, and autonomy. By giving subordinates positive feedback, recognition, and social support, leaders may be better able to meet these demands. Finally, Bakker & Demerouti’s (2014) job demands-resources model may offer a framework for comprehending the connection between positive affect and leadership effectiveness.
According to this paradigm, job requirements like workload and time constraints may cause burnout and adverse outcomes. Workplace resources like social support and autonomy may increase engagement and produce favorable results. For leaders and their subordinates, positive affect may act as a personal resource that can reduce the negative effects of job demands and boost the positive benefits of job resources. In summary, theories such as the broaden-and-build theory, transformational leadership theory, self-determination theory, and work demands-resources model can serve as a sound conceptual basis for research on the connection between positive affect and effective leadership. Researchers can find pertinent occurrences, create research questions, and choose the best data-gathering tools by employing these theories to delve more into this subject.
Organizational psychology research has centered on the connection between positive emotion and leadership effectiveness and several theoretical frameworks have been put forth to explain this connection (Bono & Judge, 2003; George, 2000; Goleman, 1995). These frameworks propose various mechanisms through which positive emotions contribute to leadership effectiveness, including enhancing decision-making skills, fostering better team dynamics, and emerging innovative problem-solving (Fredrickson,2001; Isen, Daubman, & Nowicki, 1987). The relationship between positive affect and effective leadership has been studied through various theoretical lenses, including the broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions (Fredrickson, 2001), transformational leadership theory (Bass & Riggio, 2006), sell-determination theory (Deci & Ryan, 2000), and the work demands-resources model (Bakker & Demerouti, 2007). These frameworks offer multiple angles from which to understand how positive affect contributes to effective leadership, encompassing aspects such as emotional intelligence, intrinsic motivation, and the optimization of workplace resources.
While much research has explored the relationship between positive affect and effective leadership, there remains a gap in the literature regarding the precise mechanisms by which positive affect and leadership effectiveness (Dasborough, Ashkanasy, Tee, & Tse, 2009; Bono, & Ilies, 2006). Various theoretical frameworks provide insights, but more empirical studies are needed to identify the specific pathways through which positive emotions translate into effective leadership (Bass & Riggio, 2006; Fredrickson, 2001).
One possible area of investigation is examining the function of emotional intelligence in the association between positive affect and leadership effectiveness (Goleman, 1995; Salovey & Mayer, 1990; George, 2000). Given that emotional intelligence involves the ability to recognize, understand, and manage one’s own emotions, as well as the emotions of others, it may serve as a mediating or moderating variable in this relationship (Brackett, Rivers, & Salovey, 2011; Joseph & Newman, 2010). When it comes to fostering a positive work environment, developing relationships with subordinates, and facilitating communication and collaboration, leaders with high emotional intelligence may be better able to leverage their positive affect (Goleman, 1998; Mayer, Caruso, & Salovey, 1999; Carmell, 2003). Research indicates that emotional intelligence can significantly affect a leader’s capacity to build a cohesive team, foster open communication, and generally contribute to a more positive and collaborative work atmosphere (Druskat & Wolff, 2001; Brackett, Rivers, Salovery, 2011).
The significance of context in the relationship between positive affect and effective leadership should also be considered. For instance, depending on the number of jobs demands and resources, the impacts of positive affect and leadership effectiveness may change. Although this association may not always hold, leaders with high levels of positive affect, including resilience may be better equipped to manage high job demands and use job resources to foster a positive work environment (Fredrickson, 2001; Luthans, 2002; Bakker & Demerouti, 2017). Empirical studies suggest that such leaders are more capable of mitigating the stressors associated with high job demands and utilizing available resources to create a conducive atmosphere for teamwork and productivity (Xanthopoulou, Bakker, Demerouti & Schaufeli, 2009; Tugade & Fredrickson, 2004).
The relationship between positive affect and effective leadership can be studied using a variety of theoretical frameworks. However, there is still much to learn about the precise mechanisms by which positive affect influence leadership effectiveness. This study contributes to our understanding of this link by studying the relationship between positive affect and effective leadership to deepen our understanding of the mechanisms that enhance leadership effectiveness, thereby informing training programs, organizational practices, and theoretical models. It can help create interventions to improve organizational leadership effectiveness by looking at the roles of emotional intelligence, context, and boundary conditions.
The proposed research questions closely match the theoretical underpinnings of this study on the connection between positive affect and effective leadership. The first study topic aims to investigate how positive affect positively affect leadership effectiveness. This is consistent with the broaden-and-build hypothesis of positive emotions, which contends that pleasant emotions increase a person’s thought-action repertoire and help them develop lasting personal resources they can employ to succeed in the face of future challenges. This study can advance our knowledge of how positive emotions are experienced and interpreted in the context of leadership effectiveness by examining the common experiences and interpretations of positive affect among leaders in the workplace.
The job demands-resources paradigm, developed within the field of work and organizational psychology, contends that job demands and resources may significantly influence both employee well-being and work outcomes (Bakker & Demerouti, 2007; Demerouti, Bakker, Nachreiner, & Schaufeli, 2001). Studies have confirmed that high job demands can lead to burnout and decreased well-being, while adequate job resources can foster engagement and better performance (Schaufeli & Baker, 2004; Hakanen, Schaufeli, & Ahola, 2008). In general, the research questions in this study completely align with the theoretical underpinnings of the connection between positive affect and effective leadership.
This study can improve our understanding of how positive affect impacts leadership effectiveness and inform the development of interventions to improve effective leadership in organizations by examining common experiences and interpretations of positive affect leaders, and how positive affect is integrated into leadership styles. Organizations should pay close attention to the relationship between pleasant emotions and effective leadership, which has a strong theoretical and empirical foundation. (George, 2000; Goleman, 1998; Barsade & Gibson, 2007). Research shows that leaders who express and foster positive emotions can significantly impact team dynamics, employee engagement and overall organizational performance (Fredrickson,2003; Ashkanasy & Tse, 2000).
The expand-and-build theory of positive emotions, which contends that pleasant emotions extend a person’s thought-action repertoire and create personal resources that can be used to thrive in future experiences, serves as the theoretical foundation for this relationship. Positive affect may play a significant role in effective leadership, according to this hypothesis, which has been applied to the study of leadership. Early research in positive affect and leadership mostly concentrated on the connection between charismatic leadership and happy feelings. However, recent studies have widened this focus to examine the function of positive affect in various leadership circumstances and styles. For instance, the relationship between positive affect and effective leaders has been examined using the work demands-resources model, which suggests that positive affect may operate as a resource that improves leader effectiveness.
Empirical studies have shown mixed results on the link between positive emotion and effective leaders. While some studies have identified a strong correlation between successful leadership and positive affect, others have found no or even a negative correlation. One explanation for these contradictory results is that the impact of positive affect on leadership may depend on various individual and contextual variables, including the leadership style, the traits of the followers, and the nature of the work environment. The research on the connection between positive affect and effective leaders is generally intricate and multidimensional. It is crucial to keep probing this connection to expand the knowledge of the elements that go into effective leadership.
Current Trends in Research on Positive Affects
The ideas of ancient Greek philosophers such as Socrates and Aristotle have had a lasting influence on modern perspectives on well-being. These philosophers’ ideas have heavily influenced positive psychology, and contemporary theories of well-being often emphasize the importance of positive affect in achieving a fulfilling life. Positive affect has been integrated into many aspects of modern life, from workplace wellness programs to self-help books. The Socrates period of ancient Greek philosophy played an essential role in the early conceptualizations of well-being, with a focus on the concept of ‘eudaimonia,’ or human flourishing.
Although not directly equivalent, this could be seen as an early precursor to the modern psychological construct of positive affect (Waterman, 1993; Ryff & Singer, 2008; Keyes, Shmotkin, & Ryff, 2002). For example, ‘Socrates’ emphasis on self-examination and the cultivation of virtues (Vlastos, 1991) could be seen as promoting psychological well-being. Similarly, his protégé Plato wrote extensively on the role of the ‘Good’ and the ‘Beautiful’ in human life, concepts that also relate to aspects of well-being (Annas,1999). Another example, Aristotle who introduced ‘virtue ethics’ as a pathway to eudaimonia or flourishing and believed in a ‘golden mean,’ where the cultivation of virtues and balanced behaviors contribute to the individual’s overall sense of well-being (Aristotle & Ross, 1925; Hursthouse,1999).
The ideas of Socrates and Aristotle have influenced contemporary positive psychology, which views positive affect as a critical component of well-being. Positive affect has been shown to impact many aspects of well-being positively, and its importance is reflected in modern perspectives on happiness and life satisfaction. The history of positive affect in the Socrates period continues to influence our understanding of well-being today. Current trends in research on positive affect recent research on positive affect has focused on a range of topics, including the neural basis of positive emotions (Kringelbach & Berridge, 2017), the relationship between positive emotions and physical health (Pressman & Cohen, 2005), and the effects of positive emotions on cognitive processes such as attention and memory (Fredrickson, 2001). Additionally, research has explored the role of positive affect in different contexts, including the workplace (Sonnentag, 2015) and in education (Lavy & Sand, 2015). Leadership is essential in various fields, including education, business, and healthcare. Positive affect refers to the happiness, joy, and enthusiasm individuals experience in different situations. Prior research has explored the relationship between positive affect and leadership styles. This chapter aims to review prior research on this phenomenon and discuss various methodologies and designs used.
Prior Research
Positive affect, defined as an individual’s subjective experience of feeling good, joyful, or happy, has received considerable attention in the field of psychology (Fredrickson, 2001). Understanding the impact of positive affect and effective leaders is of great significance, as it can contribute to effective leadership, improved individual and team outcomes, and organizational success. This research aims to synthesize prior research and similar studies to provide a comprehensive understanding of the relationship between positive affect and effective leadership. Numerous studies have demonstrated the positive influence of positive affect on leadership effectiveness. For instance, Dutton and colleagues (2003) investigated how positive emotions impact leadership outcomes in 54 leaders. They found that leaders who experienced positive affect were more likely to engage in behaviors that promoted the growth and development of their subordinates. Similarly, Fredrickson (2001) explored how positive emotions can broaden individuals’ cognitive and behavioral repertoire, leading to better leadership outcomes. In another study, Avolio and colleagues (2004) explored the relationship between positive affect and transformational leadership in a sample of 109 mid-level managers. They found that transformational leadership was positively related to positive affect, which suggests that leaders who experience positive emotions may be more likely to engage in transformational leadership behaviors.
“In a similar study, Luthans and Avolio (2003) found that positive psychological capital, which encompasses components like self-efficacy, optimism, hope, and resilience, also includes positive affect. Their research showed that this form of psychological capitol was positively related to transformational leadership, thereby providing empirical support for the link between leader’s positive emotional state and their effectiveness in leading others (Luthans and Avolio (2003, p. 249).” Prior research has explored the relationship between positive affect and leadership effectiveness using different methodologies and designs. Some studies have used self-report measures to assess the levels of positive affect and effective leaders of individuals. For example, Zhang and Bartol (2010) investigated the relationship between positive affect and transformational leadership in a sample of 208 employees. They found that leaders who experienced positive affect were more likely to engage in transformational leadership behaviors.
Other studies have used observational methods to assess leadership behaviors in real time. For instance, Barsade (2002) used observational methods to investigate how leaders’ emotional contagion impacts their workgroup’s emotional climate. She found that leaders who experienced positive affect could create a positive emotional climate in their workgroups, leading to better work outcomes. Leaders who exhibit higher levels of positive affect are more likely to engage in behaviors that promote positive outcomes, such as empathy, supportiveness, and flexibility (Barsade, 2002). Moreover, positive affect has been associated with enhanced communication skills and conflict management abilities, enabling leaders to build stronger relationships with their subordinates (Ashkanasy & Humphrey, 2011).
Research consistently highlights the positive influence of positive affect on leadership effectiveness. According to Ashkanasy and Humphrey (2011), “leaders who experience positive affect are more likely to exhibit behaviors that are conducive to positive outcomes, such as empathy, supportiveness, and flexibility” (p. 217). This suggests that leaders with higher levels of positive affect are more likely to engage in behaviors that enhance professional relationships and foster positive outcomes within their teams. Studies have shown that positive affect is associated with improved individual and team outcome in the workplace. Bowling and Hammond (2008) emphasize that “employees who experience higher levels of positive affect are more satisfied with their jobs, exhibit higher levels of organizational commitment, and are less likely to be absent from work” (p. 646). Moreover, team members who work with leaders exhibiting positive affect tend to experience higher level of satisfaction and engagement, leading to enhances team performance (Barsade, 2002).
The implication of positive affect and effective leadership extend beyond individual and team outcomes. Positive affect plays a crucial role in creating a positive work environment and enhancing organizational success. Peterson and Luthans (2003) state that “Leaders who cultivate positive affect among their subordinates contribute to the development of positive and hopeful organizational climate” (p.28). Organizations need to recognize the significance of positive affect in promoting positive professional relationship and take proactive steps to foster its development. These findings highlight the vital role of positive affect in facilitating effective leadership.
The impact of positive affect extends beyond leadership effectiveness to individual and team outcomes. Research indicates that leaders with higher levels of positive affect are more successful in fostering creativity and innovation within their teams (George & Zhou, 2007). Positive affect has also been linked to improved job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and reduced absenteeism among employees (Bowling & Hammond, 2008). Additionally, team members who work with leaders exhibiting positive affect tend to experience higher levels of satisfaction and engagement in their work, leading to enhanced team performance (Barsade, 2002).
Organizations play a crucial role in supporting and fostering positive affect in their leaders. By creating a positive work environment that values collaboration, teamwork, and employee recognition, organizations can enhance leadership effectiveness and promote positive outcomes (Bowling & Hammond, 2008). Providing social support networks and implementing strategies to manage stress can also contribute to cultivating positive affect among leaders (Ashkanasy & Humphrey, 2011). Therefore, organizations need to recognize the significance of positive affect in professional relationships and take proactive steps to facilitate its development. Prior research and similar studies consistently demonstrate the positive influence of positive affect on leadership effectiveness, individual and team outcomes, and organizational success. However, there remain several gaps in the literature, such as limited studies exploring the mechanisms through which positive affect influences professional relationships and the potential moderating factors. Future research should address these gaps to further enrich our understanding of the relationship between positive affect and professional relationships.
Methodologies and Designs
Understanding the relationship between positive affect and professional relationships requires robust methodologies and designs that capture the complexities of this dynamic interaction. This research provides an in-depth analysis of the methodologies and designs employed in prior research and similar studies exploring the relationship between positive affect and leadership effectiveness. Some research has employed a multi-method approach to understand the role of positive affect on leadership behaviors, experimental designs, often involving interventions, to modify affect, have been used to establish causality between positive emotional affect and leadership effectiveness. Such interventions may include mindfulness practices, emotionally intelligence training, or positive psychology exercises aimed at increasing positive affect in leaders (Fredrickson, 2001; Goleman, 1998; Lyubormirsky, King, & Diener, 2005). In addition, self-report measures offer insights into leaders’ own perceptions of their emotional states and leadership capabilities (George, 2000). Observational techniques provide third-party evaluations of leadership behaviors in real-time situations, further enriching the empirical understanding of how positive affect impacts leadership (Riggio & Reichard, 2008).
By examining the strengths and limitations of these approaches, researchers can gain valuable insights into the most effective ways to investigate this important area of study. Surveys and questionnaires are commonly used to measure variables such as positive affect, leadership effectiveness, and team outcomes. For example, a study by Barsade (2002) utilized a survey-based approach to examine the influence of positive affect on group behavior, finding that “higher levels of positive affect were associated with increased cooperation and positive interactions among group members” (p. 650). Qualitative research methods offer valuable insights into the subjective experiences and perceptions of individuals in professional relationships. In-depth interviews allow researchers to explore the nuances of positive affect and its impact on professional relationships.
Ashkanasy & Humphrey (2011) utilized qualitative methods to gain a deeper understanding of the role of positive affect in organizational behavior emphasizing that “interviews provided rich narratives and personal accounts, enabling a comprehensive exploration of individuals’ experiences and perceptions” (p. 218). Qualitative approaches contribute to the development of theory and provide context-specific insights. Mixed methods design, which integrated both quantitative and qualitative approaches, offer a comprehensive understanding of the relationship between positive affect and professional relationship. These designs enable researchers to capture the breadth and depth of the phenomenon under investigation by combing quantitative data analysis with qualitative exploration. Researchers can examine the relationships between variables while also uncovering the underlying mechanisms and processes. Tuckey, Bakker, & Dollard (2008) employed a mixed-methods approach to examine the optimizing working conditions for engagement, finding that “the quantitative data revealed the overall relationship between positive affect and engagement, while the qualitative data shed light on the specific conditions and behaviors that influenced this relationship” (p. 191).
Longitudinal designs, which involve studying the same individuals or groups over an extended period, offer valuable insights into the temporal dynamics of positive affect and professional relationships. By capturing changes and trajectories over the time, longitudinal studies can examine the causal relationship between positive affect and outcomes in professional relationships. For example. Lyubomirsky, King, and Diener (2005) conducted a longitudinal study that demonstrated the bidirectional relationship between positive affect and success, emphasizing that “frequent positive affect leads to success, and success, in turn, enhances positive affect” (p. 807). Longitudinal designs provide stronger evidence of causality and enable researchers to identify factors that influence the relationship over time. Studies that control positive emotion and examine its effects on leadership behaviors have used experimental methodologies. For instance, Barsade and Gibson (2007) employed an experimental approach in one study to look at how good emotion affected leadership actions. Researchers discovered that leaders who were made to feel positive about themselves were likelier to exhibit transformational leadership traits than those who were made to feel negative about themselves.
Some research has employed experimental designs to examine the effect of positive affect on leadership behaviors in addition to self-report measures and observational techniques. To modify positive affect and examine its effect on moral leadership behaviors, Chen and colleagues (2014), for instance, employed an experimental methodology. They discovered that leaders with positive affect were more likely to exercise moral leadership than those with negative affect. Also, other research has investigated the brain mechanisms behind the association between positive affect and leadership using neuroimaging methods like fMRI. For instance, Shi and colleagues (2019) employed fMRI to examine the brain processes underlying the link between positive affect and moral leadership actions. They discovered that leaders who felt good about themselves had more activity in the parts of the brain linked to moral thinking and judgment. Overall, various approaches and designs have allowed researchers to look at the connection between effective leadership and good affect from several perspectives. Results imply that leaders who feel good affect may be more inclined to engage in transformational leadership behaviors and actions that support the growth and development of their subordinates. Self-report assessments, observational techniques, and experimental designs have all been used to study this link differently. The employment of these many methods has helped researchers comprehend the phenomenon more fully.
Themes Related to the Relationship between Positive Affect and Leadership Styles
Positive affect plays a crucial role in the realm of leadership effectiveness, influencing various aspects of leadership and outcomes. This section explores key themes that emerge from prior research and similar studies, shedding light on the relationship between positive affect and effective leaders. Positive affect has been linked to higher level of emotional intelligence and empathy in leaders, offering them nuanced insights into emotions and needs of the team member (Golman,1998; Mayer, Salovey & Caruso, 2008). Such leaders are often better at managing interpersonal relationships and adapting to changing social dynamics, thereby fostering a more cooperative and productive work environment (George, 2000; Brackett, Rivers, & Salovey, 2011).
According to Barsade (2002). “Leaders with higher positive affect exhibit greater empathy and emotional intelligence, enabling them to understand and respond to the emotions of their team members” (p. 654). These leaders are more attuned to the emotional needs of their team members, leading to improved communication, trust, and collaboration within the team. Positive affect is associated with increased in flexibility and adaptability in leaders, enabling them to respond effectively to changing circumstances and challenges. Leaders with higher levels of positive affect are more open to new ideas and alternative approaches, fostering a culture of innovation and creativity with their teams.
George & Zhou (2007) emphasize that “Positive affect enhances leaders’ flexibility and adaptability, allowing them to embrace change and navigate complex situations with resilience and agility” (p. 608). Their positive mindset enables them to embrace change, navigate complex situations with resilience and agility, and inspire their team to do the same. Positive affect is closely related to supportive and inspirational leadership behaviors. Leaders who experience positive are more likely to exhibit behaviors that create a supportive work environment, such as providing encouragement, recognition, and support to team members. Ashkanasy & Humphrey (2011) discuss that “Leaders with positive affect inspire and motivate their team members through their enthusiasm and positive outlook” (p. 220). Their positive outlook and enthusiasm inspire and motivate team members, leading to higher levels of engagement, job satisfaction, and performance. Leaders who cultivate positive affect among their team members contribute to the development of a positive organizational climate. This climate is characterized by trust, cooperation, and a sense of well-being flourish” (p.28). Positive affective experience is contagious and can create a ripple an effect, spreading positive emotions throughout the organization and enhancing overall organizational performance and success.
Many themes about the connection between positive affect and leadership effectiveness appear in the literature. The first topic is that positive affect leaders demonstrate more significant leadership behaviors and results. The development of healthy emotional climates in workgroups, transformational leadership, and ethical leadership have all been linked to positive affect. The second element is that followers’ behaviors and attitudes can be influenced by positive affect. For example, positively affected leaders can foster a work climate that fosters innovation, job happiness, and organizational commitment. Positive impact can also make followers more motivated, engaged, and productive. The third theme is that many variables affect the relationship between positive affect and effectiveness leadership, including cultural values, job requirements, and follower and leader personality traits. A leader needs to gain the appropriate abilities. If their organization’s culture does not promote positive leadership, they may not necessarily display positive leadership behaviors even while experiencing positive affect. The fourth theme is interventions’ significance in improving positive affect and leadership abilities.
George (2000) conducted yet another literature analysis to examine the effect of emotional intelligence on effective leadership. According to the analysis, followers regard leaders with high levels of emotional intelligence—including positive affect—as more effective because they demonstrate more transformational and moral leadership behaviors. More recently, a literature review by Walumbwa and Schaubroeck (2009) investigated the connection between positive affect and worker performance. According to the review, a leader’s positive attitude can affect a team member’s motivation, work satisfaction, and performance. The review also emphasized the need for additional studies to look at the processes behind this link. Waldman et al. (2004) conducted a second evaluation of the literature to investigate the effect of a leader’s emotional intelligence on their ability to lead effectively. A high level of emotional intelligence, including positive affect, was associated with more transformative leadership actions and higher follower outcomes in the review. Methods to Increasing Positive Affect
Many approaches can increase positive affect, including emotional control techniques, positive psychology interventions, and mindfulness training. Moreover, training, and coaching programs that emphasize the development of transformational and ethical leadership qualities can help people improve their leadership abilities. The literature evaluation concludes that there are several facets and influences on the relationship between positive affect and effective leaders. First, positive affect can influence the attitudes and influence the styles of their followers. Second, positive affect is exhibited through superior leadership behaviors and results in leaders. Third, interventions can be utilized to improve positive affect and leadership abilities because of the intricate relationship between positive affect and leadership effectiveness. Several literature studies have examined the connection between positive affect and effective leaders. According to a central review by Luthans and Avolio (2003), leaders that experience good affect demonstrate more successful leadership practices, such as transformational leadership, and influence their followers to achieve more significant results. The study also emphasized the requirement for initiatives encouraging followers and leaders to feel good about themselves.
Data from Varies Studies
Positive affect and effective leadership have been the subject of numerous research. In one investigation, Barsade and Gibson (2007) looked at the effect of positive affect on the effectiveness of teams. According to the study, teams with positive affective leaders performed better and worked together more effectively than teams with opposing influential leaders. Another study by Javidan et al. (2006) examined the connection between effective cross-cultural leadership and the positive leader affect. According to the study, followers in both Western and non-Western cultures rated their leaders who showed positive emotion as more effective. In a third study, Pelled et al. (2007) examined the connection between team innovation and leader happiness.
According to the study, managers who showed positive affect were likelier to promote good ideas, open communication, and foster creativity among their staff. Finally, Howell and Avolio (1993) examined how the leader’s favorable affect impacted follower performance. According to the study, followers of positive affective leaders showed more significant commitment, work satisfaction, and task performance. As a result, evidence from numerous research suggests that leaders who show positive affect are likely to produce better performance results, foster team creativity, and influence followers to produce better results. Effective cross-cultural leadership also is positively correlated with positive affect. These findings underline how crucial it is to encourage positive affect in leaders and imply that initiatives could significantly impact how influential leaders are.
Themes of Past Literature Review Relevant to Dissertation Topic
The themes found in the literature review offer insightful information on the connection between positive affect and effective leadership. In particular, the literature contends that positive affect is linked to enhanced follower outcomes, higher levels of creativity, and better performance results. These findings directly impact this dissertation subject, which seeks to explore the connection between positive affect and leadership effectiveness. The literature study also emphasizes the significance of encouraging leaders’ positive affect, a key component of my dissertation research. This study investigates how leaders can cultivate and sustain positive affect and how this impacts their leadership effectiveness. The literature review serves as the study’s framework by highlighting important ideas and issues the researcher can build upon and further examine. The literature study also underlines how crucial it is to consider cultural variables when evaluating leadership effectiveness. This is especially pertinent to the dissertation topic since this study will explore how the relationship between positive affect and effective leaders differs across various cultural contexts.
The results of earlier research on cross-cultural leadership effectiveness can shed light on the potential positive effects on leadership effectiveness in various cultural contexts. The topics in the literature study are highly pertinent to the dissertation issue since they lighten the connection between leadership styles effectiveness and positive affect. The literature shows that positive affect is linked to better performance, increased innovation, and better follower results. The research also emphasizes the significance of encouraging positive affect in leaders and considering cultural variables when evaluating leadership effectiveness. Examining the connection between positive affect and leadership styles effectiveness is guided by these issues, which serve as the dissertation’s theoretical framework.
Importance of the Study
The leadership’s effectiveness significantly influences an organization’s performance and success. Positive affective leaders may better inspire people, motivate them to action, and accomplish organizational objectives. Even with the significance of positive affect in leadership, empirical research on the connection between positive affect and effective leadership still needs to be developed. There is a need to investigate this relationship in various cultural contexts because the existing research on the connection between good affect and leadership effectiveness has mainly focused on Western situations. This study will investigate how successful leadership relates to positive affect in various cultural contexts. This is crucial because cultural differences can affect the efficacy and conduct of leaders.
Ultimately, this study has implications for organizations regarding how to build and maintain the excellent effect and how it influences the efficacy of leadership. The performance of businesses can be enhanced by using these findings to create efficient leadership development programs. The relationship between positive affect and effective leadership will be examined in this study, which will be relevant for several reasons. First, it will close a gap in the body of knowledge regarding the influence of positive affect on the efficacy of leadership. Second, it will investigate the connection between successful leadership and positive affect in various cultural contexts. Ultimately, it has applications for enterprises regarding leadership development and performance enhancement.
Theoretical Foundation
Leadership is a complicated, multifaceted phenomenon that is essential to an organization’s success and the morale of its workforce. Positive affect is one of the elements linked to successful leadership and happiness, joy, and contentment are examples of good emotions. Positive affect has been related to several beneficial outcomes, including improved mental health, increased resilience, and enhanced job performance (Fredrickson & Losada,2005). With a focus on how positive affect influences effective leadership, this research intends to review the literature on the connection between positive affect and leadership effectiveness. Theoretically, there are numerous ways to explain how positive affect influences effective leaders. The broaden-and-build hypothesis of happy emotions is one such viewpoint. It contends that pleasant emotions cause people to think and behave more broadly, fostering creativity, adaptability, and problem-solving abilities (Fredrickson, 2001). This improved cognitive flexibility enables leaders to respond to problems and opportunities creatively and efficiently, enhancing their ability to perform in the workplace.
Emotional Intelligence, or EI, is defined as the capacity to recognize, comprehend, and control one’s own and other’s emotions (Goleman, Boyatzis, & Mckee, 2002). A person’s emotional intelligence can be increased through experiencing positive emotions, which can improve their capacity to lead others successfully (Lopes, Salovey, & Straus, 2003). A growing body of empirical research has shown how positive affect and effective leadership are positively correlated. For instance, Lyubomirsky, King, & Diener, 2005) indicated that those with higher levels of positive affect had more potential for leadership and were evaluated as more successful leaders by their superiors. In addition, Judge, Thoresen, Bono & Patton (2001) discovered that people with higher levels of positive affect were more likely to engage in proactive activities like taking the initiative and taking on leadership roles, which are essential for efficient professional leadership. Research shows that a happy attitude can improve team performance, including cooperation and innovation (Barsade, 2002). For instance, a study by Huang, Fleenor, and Liden (2011) indicated that teams headed by leaders with high positive affect were assessed as having more effective team members and greater performance and work satisfaction.
Leadership
A leader can be defined as an individual who demonstrates a high level of competence and skill in their chosen field while also possessing the ability to inspire and guide others toward achieving common goals Northouse, P. G. (2016). This study mainly focuses on exploring the positive affect and leadership styles of a leader, including communication, adaptability, and emotional intelligence. Communication is a crucial trait for professional leaders. Effective communication involves the ability to convey information clearly and concisely and the capacity to listen actively and empathetically. This trait enables leaders to build strong relationships with their team members, understand their perspectives and concerns, and facilitate open dialogue, leading to increased collaboration, productivity, and overall success Robbins, S. P., & Coulter, M. (2016).
According to Sapienza & Popp (2018), effective communication is a crucial leadership competency that can positively impact organizational performance and effectiveness. Adaptability is another essential trait of a professional leader. In today’s rapidly changing and dynamic environment, adjusting and adapting to new situations is essential for success. An adaptable professional leader can remain agile and flexible, responding to new challenges and opportunities in a way that inspires and motivates their team.
According to Bennis & Nanus (2017), adaptability is a core competency of successful leadership that enables leaders to navigate complex and unpredictable environments easily. Emotional intelligence is another trait that sets professional leaders apart from others. Emotional intelligence involves understanding and managing one’s emotions and those of others. A leader with high emotional intelligence can effectively manage conflict, build positive relationships, and inspire trust and loyalty in their team. According to Goleman (2017), emotional intelligence is a crucial characteristic of effective leadership linked to improved team performance and job satisfaction. In addition to these critical traits, professional leaders demonstrate a strong work ethic and a commitment to ongoing learning and development. They lead by example, set a high standard for themselves and their team, and constantly seek new ways to improve their skills and knowledge. This dedication to self-improvement and growth enables professional leaders to stay at the forefront of their industry and inspire their teams to do the same. Overall, a professional leader can be defined as an individual who possesses a range of key traits, including effective communication, adaptability, emotional intelligence, a strong work ethic, and a commitment to ongoing learning and development. These traits enable professional leaders to inspire and guide their teams toward achieving common goals, despite challenges and obstacles.
Different forms of Leadership – Transformational leadership
Leadership is a crucial aspect of organizational success, and leaders play a vital role in determining the direction and success of organizations. However, the challenges of being a leader can sometimes hinder their effectiveness and impact on the organization. One of the primary challenges that leaders face is managing the diverse needs and opinions of the organization. For example, employees may want to pursue personal development opportunities, while the organization may prioritize meeting its production targets. This can lead to conflicts, and leaders must find a way to resolve them to benefit both employees and the organization (Northhouse, 2016). Another challenge that leaders face is adapting to changes in the environment. The business environment is rapidly changing, and leaders must be able to respond to these changes quickly and effectively. For instance, technological advancements are transforming the way organizations operate, and leaders must be able to adopt new technologies and incorporate them into their organizational strategies (Kotter, 1996). Additionally, leaders must be able to motivate and inspire their employees to adapt to these changes, which can be challenging given the human tendency to resist change (Bennis & Thomas,2002).
Leadership is commonly the process of influencing the activities of an organized setting in its efforts towards goal setting and achievement (Martin, 2018). Followers can have a detrimental impact on the ability of a leader to lead effectively. Research suggests that followers can resist leadership in many ways, both passively and aggressively, stymying a leader’s leadership efforts (Martin, 2018). The ability of a leader to garner followers is positively correlated with one’s ability to create meaning for one’s followers. Transformational leadership is a leadership style that emphasizes the importance of inspiring and motivating followers to achieve their full potential. This leadership style often contrasts with transactional leadership, which focuses on exchanging rewards for compliance. According to Bass and Avolio (1994) and other researchers identified several key characteristics of transformational leadership.
These include:
Charisma. Transformational leaders are often seen as charismatic and inspirational, able to communicate a vision for the future that resonates with followers.
Inspiration.Transformational leaders inspire and motivate followers to achieve their full potential, often by appealing to their values and emotions
Intellectual stimulation. Transformational leaders encourage followers to think creatively and independently, challenging them to question assumptions and develop new ideas.
Individualized consideration. Transformational leaders are attentive to their followers’ needs and concerns, providing personalized support and feedback.
Research has shown that transformational leadership can have various positive effects on followers. For example, a meta-analysis by Judge and Piccolo (2004) found that transformational leadership was associated with higher job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and performance. Additionally, transformational leadership has been linked to lower turnover rates and improved psychological well-being among followers (Walumbwa et al., 2008). However, while transformational leadership has many benefits, it has challenges and criticisms. One common criticism is that measuring or assessing transformational leadership can be difficult, as it involves subjective perceptions of leaders and followers. Additionally, some have argued that transformational leadership can be too focused on the leader and not enough on the needs and perspectives of followers (Bryman, 1996).
There are several areas where future research on transformational leadership could be fruitful. For example, researchers could investigate the effectiveness of different approaches to training and developing transformational leaders or explore the potential for technology to enhance the effectiveness of transformational leadership. Furthermore, there is a need for more research on the role of followers in the transformational leadership process, including their perceptions and responses to transformational leaders. While there are challenges and criticisms associated with transformational leadership, it is an important area of research that has the potential to inform leadership development and training programs in a variety of settings.
Transactional leadership is a leadership style that focuses on exchanging rewards and punishments between the leader and their followers to achieve desired outcomes. This style is based on the premise that individuals are motivated by rewards and punishments. A leader’s role is to ensure that rewards are given to those who meet expectations and punishments are given to those who do not. Transactional leadership theory is based on social exchange, which suggests that people are motivated by self-interest and will engage in behaviors that maximize their rewards and minimize their costs. The leader, in this case, acts as the exchange partner, offering rewards for desired behaviors and punishments for undesired behaviors. This exchange is contingent on the follower’s behavior, with the leader only providing rewards when the follower meets expectations. The most prominent transactional leadership model is the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ), developed by Bass and Avolio (1990).
The MLQ measures three factors of transactional leadership: contingent reward, exception-active management, and exception-passive management. Contingent reward refers to exchanging rewards for desired behavior, while management by exception-active involves intervening when problems arise. Management by exception-passive involves waiting for problems to arise before intervening. Transactional leadership is often used in organizations that focus on maintaining the status quo and achieving specific goals. This leadership style is most effective when the work is routine and has a clear chain of command. The leader’s role is to ensure that followers understand what is expected of them and are rewarded when they meet those expectations. For example, a sales manager might offer a bonus to a salesperson who exceeds their monthly sales quota. One of the strengths of transactional leadership is its ability to create a stable and predictable work environment.
Using rewards and punishments provides a clear framework for behavior, and followers know what is expected of them. Also, this style can be effective when there is a need for quick decision-making, as the leader can step in and make decisions when necessary. However, there are also weaknesses to this leadership style. Focusing on rewards and punishments can limit creativity and innovation, as followers may be more concerned with meeting expectations than exploring new ideas. Additionally, transactional leaders may struggle to motivate followers who are not motivated by rewards, as they may not be able to offer a reward that is meaningful to that individual. Transactional leadership can be a useful tool for leaders to motivate followers, but it is important to consider its strengths and weaknesses when deciding whether to use this style.
Authentic Leadership
Authentic leadership has emerged as a vital framework in leadership studies, addressing the need for leaders who are genuine, transparent, and ethical in their interactions. According to George (2003), authentic leaders are characterized by their self-awareness, which means they recognize their strengths, limitations, and emotions. They demonstrate a consistency between their values, beliefs, and actions, ensuring their leadership style remains congruent with their authentic self. Authentic leadership goes beyond just being genuine; it involves continuously developing oneself, understanding one’s purpose, and establishing open, transparent relationships with followers (George, 2003 p. 112). Furthermore, Walumbwa et al. (2008) expanded on the construct of authentic leadership by outlining four key components: self-awareness, relational transparency, balanced processing, and internalized moral perspective.
Relational transparency involves expressing one’s true thoughts and feelings, while ensuring mutual respect in leader-follower relationships. Balanced processing refers to objectively analyzing relevant data before making decisions, and an internalized moral perspective reflects an internal regulatory process where leaders are guided by internal moral standards and values (Walumbwa., 2008, p. 95). The significance of authentic leadership lies in its positive impact on organizational outcomes. Studies have shown that authenticity in leadership fosters trust, job satisfaction, and overall organizational commitment among followers (Avolio, Gardner, Walumbwa, Luthans, & May, 2004, p. 808). By leading with authenticity, leaders not only bolster their own credibility but also inspire a culture of openness, trust, and ethical behavior within organizations. In an era marked by skepticism towards leadership, the authentic leadership framework offers a path forward, emphasizing genuine, ethical, and transparent leadership practices.
Positive Affect and Leadership Styles
Leadership is an essential component of any organization. Effective leadership enables individuals to work towards the same goal, which drives organizational success. Transformational leadership is a style that has been proven to be effective in organizations. It is a style of leadership where leaders create a vision, inspire, motivate followers, and bring about change that benefits the organization. In this section, this research will explore the transformational leadership style and how possessing a positive affect can make a leader more effective in their field. One of the critical traits of a transformational leader is a positive effect. Positive affect refers to an individual’s emotions, moods, and feelings. Transformational leaders who possess a positive affect are optimistic, enthusiastic, and inspiring (Howell & Avolio, 1993). In addition, they have a positive attitude towards work, their followers, and the organization, which makes them approachable and easy to work with. Research has shown that leaders with a positive affect are more effective in leading teams and improving organizational outcomes (Liu et al., 2021).
A transformational leader with a positive effect is also a professional leader. Professionalism refers to the ability to exhibit ethical behavior, possess technical expertise, and maintain a professional demeanor. A leader with a positive affect can inspire followers to act ethically, and they exhibit a high level of technical expertise (Avolio & Bass, 2002). Additionally, they maintain a professional demeanor, enabling them to gain their followers’ respect and trust. A transformational leader who is professional in their approach can foster a positive work environment that leads to improved organizational outcomes. One way a transformational leader with a positive effect can exhibit professionalism is through effective communication. Effective communication is essential in any leadership role. It involves being able to communicate the vision and goals of the organization, as well as provide feedback and support to followers. A leader with a positive affect can communicate effectively by using positive language, active listening, and providing constructive feedback (Doherty & Dickson, 2015).
By exhibiting practical communication skills, a transformational leaders can build strong relationships with their followers and create a positive work environment. Another way in which a transformational leader with a positive affect can exhibit professionalism is by being adaptable. Adaptable leaders can adjust their leadership style to fit the needs of their followers and the organization. They can identify and respond to environmental changes and adapt their approach accordingly (Eisenbeiss et al., 2008). Transformational leaders with a positive affect are adaptable because they possess a positive attitude towards change and can motivate their followers to embrace it. A transformational leader with a positive affect can also exhibit professionalism by being a mentor to their followers. Mentoring involves guiding and supporting followers to help them develop their skills and reach their full potential. A transformational leader with a positive effect can provide mentorship by creating a supportive environment, providing feedback, and setting challenging goals (Sosik & Godshalk, 2000). By providing mentorship, a transformational leaders can help their followers grow and develop, leading to the organization’s improved overall success and creating new influential leaders.
Transactional leadership is characterized by the exchange of rewards and punishments for achieving specific goals by followers. Such leaders focus on establishing clear expectations, developing standardized procedures, and promoting efficiency through performance monitoring and evaluation (Avolio, Bass, & Jung, 1999). Transactional leadership emphasizes compliance with authority and order and provides a framework for motivating followers by linking their effort to rewards or punishment (Bass & Riggio, 2006). Transactional leaders effectively maintain stability and minimize organizational risks by emphasizing compliance with set standards. However, not all Transactional leaders possess the attributes of a professional leader. Effective leadership emphasizes the importance of ethical and moral principles in the decision-making process, encouraging teamwork and promoting the development of followers (Bennis & Thomas, 2002). In addition, effective leaders are characterized by their ability to inspire and motivate individuals, communicate effectively, and possess the skills to resolve conflicts (Bass & Riggio, 2006). Furthermore, effective leadership is essential for ensuring an organization’s success and its members’ development. Transactional leaders who possess positive affect have been identified as possessing the attributes of a professional leaders. Positive affect is how individuals experience positive emotions and feelings (Fredrickson, 2001).
Leaders with positive affects exhibit optimism, friendliness, and compassion, creating a positive work environment that fosters creativity, collaboration, and innovation (Wang & Howell, 2010). Transactional leaders with positive affect have been found to inspire and motivate followers, provide emotional support, and encourage personal development (Avey, Avolio, & Luthans, 2011). Leadership styles can impact employee job satisfaction and performance, with studies indicating that Transactional Leadership can lead to increased job satisfaction (Molero, Recio, & Puyol, 2015). However, research has also shown that Transactional Leadership without professional attributes can lead to adverse outcomes, such as decreased creativity and job satisfaction and increased turnover (Bass & Riggio, 2006).
Transactional leaders with positive affect have been found to foster positive attitudes among their followers, resulting in increased job satisfaction, reduced stress, and improved productivity (Wang & Howell, 2010). Transactional leaders with positive affect can achieve professional leadership by promoting ethical behavior, encouraging personal development, and creating a positive work environment. Ethical behavior involves making fair, just, and equitable decisions and adhering to moral principles (Bennis & Thomas, 2002). Encouraging personal development involves promoting the growth and development of followers and providing support and opportunities for growth (Avey, Avolio, & Luthans, 2011). Creating a positive work environment fosters collaboration, innovation, and creativity, where employees feel valued and appreciated (Wang & Howell, 2010).
Summary
Research on positive affect has evolved significantly over the past few decades, from the early research on happiness to the development of positive psychology and current trends in research. Understanding the determinants and consequences of positive affect is critical for promoting well-being and positive outcomes in individuals. As research on positive affect progresses, new findings and insights will likely emerge, contributing to our understanding of this critical area of psychology. The research literature suggests that positive affect is essential to effective leadership. For example, positive affect has been linked to increased creativity, flexibility, and emotional intelligence, all critical for effective leadership. Furthermore, research demonstrated that positive affect could positively impact both individual and team outcomes in the workplace. It is, therefore, essential for organizations to support and foster positive affect in their leaders to enhance their professional effectiveness. This research discusses the current research on positive affect and its implications for leadership effectiveness.
The literature suggests that positive affect is essential to effective leadership. Positive affect can be defined as a person’s subjective experience of feeling good, joyful, or happy (Fredrickson, 2001). Studies have shown that leaders with higher levels of positive affect are likelier to exhibit behaviors conducive to positive outcomes, such as empathy, supportiveness, and flexibility (Barsade, 2002). Positive affect has also been associated with improved communication skills and better management of conflict (Ashkanasy & Humphrey,2011). Individual and Team Outcomes Research has demonstrated that positive affect can positively impact both individual and team outcomes in the workplace. Leaders with higher levels of positive affect are more effective in promoting creativity and innovation (George & Zhou, 2007). Positive affect has also been linked to improved job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and decreased absenteeism (Bowling & Hammond, 2008). Additionally, team members who work with leaders who exhibit positive affect tend to experience higher satisfaction and engagement levels (Barsade, 2002). Therefore, organizations must support and foster positive affect in their leaders to enhance their professional effectiveness.
Leaders who exhibit positive affect can foster a positive work environment and promote positive outcomes for individuals and teams. Organizations can support positive affect by promoting social support networks, providing employee recognition and support opportunities, and creating a positive work culture that values collaboration and teamwork (Bowling & Hammond, 2008). Finally, positive affect is an important area of research that has implications for leadership effectiveness. As research on positive affect evolves, new findings and insights will likely emerge, contributing to our understanding of this vital area of psychology.
Chapter 3 Research Design and Methodology
The study aims to delve into the relationship between positive affect and effective leadership. This chapter provided a detailed overview of the research methodology, design, and data collection techniques used in this study. It introduced the challenges and the goals of the investigation, while clarifying the study’s scope, participant recruitment methods, and the techniques that will be used for interviews and gathering data. Potential personal bias within the research will be acknowledge, and the analytical tools use to interpret the study’s results were defined. The plan of this investigation is outlined in subsequent pages and summarized at the end of this chapter, emphasizing the methods that were implemented to successfully answer the research questions posed, and complete the purpose of this study.
The study was designed to ascertain answers to the following research questions:
RQ 1: How does positive affect impact leadership effectiveness?
Creswell (2013) defines “research design” (pp. 49-50) as the overarching approach to conducting a specific study and presents five qualitative research methodologies: narrative research, phenomenology, grounded theory, ethnography, and case studies. Narrative research inquiries into an individual’s life story; phenomenological studies seek to grasp the core of a collective experience; grounded theory emphasizes field data to derive theories; ethnography examines how information influence a group sharing a culture, and case studies focus for a detailed examination of a single or multiple instances. Carnaghan (2013) suggests that researchers utilizing qualitative methods should thoroughly consider both philosophical assumptions and interpretative frameworks. Carnaghan (2013) emphasizes that those undertaking qualitative study are “in effect agreeing to its underlying assumptions while bringing to the study their own worldviews that end up shaping the direction of their research” (p. 1). This notion is further supported by Creswell (2013), who mentions the intertwining of philosophical perspectives within interpretive frameworks that qualitative researchers employ.
Four fundamental philosophical underpinnings for qualitative research include: (a) Ontological, where researchers understand and convey reality by exploring evidence and individuals’ viewpoints. (b) Epistemological, which involves studying people’s subjective experiences to enrich understanding. (c) Axiological, in which the researcher introduces vales to a study and transparently shares any inherent biases. (d) Methodological, data collection and analysis experience. Carnaghan (2013) characterizes interpretive frameworks as “fundamental beliefs that guide actions.” These can be categorized as: (a) Positivism, applying a social science perspective. (b) Social constructivism, where researchers gather insights from diverse viewpoints. (c) Transformative, which focuses on the experiences of marginalized groups, suggesting potential action plans to support them. (d) Postmodernism, asserting that power dynamics, hierarchies, and language usage can mask underlying issues, necessitating their deconstruction to grasp genuine meanings. (e) Pragmatism, which values the effectiveness of diverse methods in various situations. (f) Theories like critical race, feminist, queer, and disability, which prioritize empowering individuals to overcome societal limitations (Carnaghan, 2013, Creswell, 2013).
Creswell (2013) emphasizes the significance of qualitative research, “noting its capability to let individuals convey their stories and experiences, while mitigating potential power disparities between the researcher and the subjects” (p. 48). He contends that high-quality qualitative studies “delve into lesser-explored or unexpected viewpoints” (p. 54). This approach allows for a deeper comprehension of topics by grasping the depth of personal experiences associated with a certain event or subject, offering insights that go beyond what simple data can reveal. Qualitative research, like other forms, isn’t without potential pitfalls. As noted by Norris (1997), “even the most seasoned researchers can err. No research method offers a perfect solution to eliminating mistakes or bias. While carious research forms may be susceptible to unique errors, none are completely free from them” (p. 173). Further elaborating on this, Norris highlights certain limitations and potential biases inherent to qualitative research, a few of which are mentioned in the subsequent points. Creswell (2013) also underscores potential biases a researcher should be cautions of. For instance, an individual’s perspective can shift when relaying a personal experience for a qualitative study. Yet, Creswell (2013) specify various merits of qualitative research, laying out criteria for effective qualitative design as follows:
To gain a clearer understanding of the relationship between positive affect and effective leadership, the researcher chose a phenomenological research design (Butin, 2009, Creswell, 2014; Roberts, 2010), which incorporated qualitative data. The phenomenological framework can more thoroughly outline the “human experience” (Creswell, 2013, p. 76) of leaders in organizational setting with a focus on “what” (p. 76) they have experiences, and “how” (p. 76) they have experiences it, to gain an understanding of which leadership styles, transformational, transactional, or authentic is the most effective when a leader exhibit positive characteristic. The qualitative dimension of this research emphasizes the real-life experiences of leaders within an organizational context, particularly viewed through a phenomenological perspective. Creswell (2014) points out that researchers can leverage qualitative data to identify evolving strategies and tendencies. This can be achieved using open-ended queries and information gathers from interviews, observations, documents, and audiovisual materials. These sources then aid in deciphering the broader patterns and themes of the investigation.
The study was chiefly approached with a “pragmatic” lens (Creswell, 2014, p. 11) adhering to the idea that “reality is determined by its practical implications” (p. 11). The pragmatic perspective was viewed through the lens of constructivism, placing emphasis on examining the interplay between individuals using a phenomenological approach. This methodology seeks to inductively create “a conceptual framework or interpretation” (Creswell, 2014, p. 8) based on the collective experiences of study participants, as gleaned from interviews and shared documents. By assessing leaders working in organization who have experienced the phenomenon with the relationship between positive affect and effective leaders, the researcher hopes to gain a broader understanding how positive emotions influences leadership styles.
The research design chosen from this study which encompasses individual interviews, and the analysis of documents is aptly suited to this specific research context. By using this multifaceted approach, the researcher can comprehensively monitor the reactions and feedback of leaders within an organizational environment. Qualitative methodologies offer a profound insight into specific events or phenomena by capturing diverse viewpoints. As highlighted by King (1998), qualitative interviews are especially pertinent in certain situations:
The study emphasizes understanding a specific occurrence within a subset of a broader population.
The researcher choses leaders in a variety of industries such as education, psychology, and in business to be able to provide an extensive understanding of how positive affect influences effective leadership generally. The study, therefore, involved 10 participants from varied types of business organization, over a six-month period, to better comprehend leadership effectiveness from based on positive traits. The participant selection for the study commenced when the researcher contacted the relevant sources at these different types of business organization to identify prospective leaders who were interested in participating in the study. The participant selection process was outlined as such:
The sample chosen from this process was further analyzed for criteria for exclusion from the study, and if needed, criteria for maximum variation.
The researcher aimed to recruit voluntary participants from various industries in business administration. Before initiating the study, the research method will be review for approval for human subjects by Pepperdine University’s Institutional Review Board (IRB). The researcher recognized the possible emotional challenges participants could face during interviews, as memories could resurface. However, the researcher will carefully make sure participants wouldn’t subject them to any risks beyond what they typically encounter in their daily lives (Saldana, 2013). Participants were selected based on their professional standing and qualifications in leadership position, ensuring no physical or emotional strain. Initial outreach to potential participants will be done either via email or a phone call, adhering to IRB-sanctioned protocols. Each participant will be provided with an Informal Consent form (seen in Appendix B) detailing the study’s procedures, offering a comprehensive overview of the subsequent:
the Institutional Review Board (IRB), ensuring that participants were at no time at risk of criminal or civil proceedings, or suffering tarnished reputations, as a result of involvement in the study (Pepperdine IRB Manual, 2009, pp. 22-23).
An IRB approved site permission form (Appendix D) was secured before any interviewing took place, and follow-up calls or emails prior to the interview session ensured that the process was in place. Appendix B. As noted earlier, every participant will require to sign consent forms specifically design to ensure their voluntary participation. These forms also emphasized their right to withdraw from the study whenever they wished without any risks related to the project. Confidentiality was a top priority, promised to be upheld during the study and thereafter. The Institutional Review Board (IRB) had given its green light to the study before it began, guaranteeing participants would never face legal repercussions or damage to their reputation due to their participation (refer to Pepperdine IRB Manual, 2009, pp. 22-23). Prior to any interviews, an IRB-endorsed site permission form (found in Appendix D) will be obtained.
Preliminary calls or emails leading up to the interview ensured all protocols were firmly established. Participants’ identities will be kept confidential for the duration of the study and thereafter, and to further enhance this anonymity, pseudonyms will replace actual names in the research investigation. All data will be obtained during interviews and will be store securely, with digital files being password-protected on a dedicated external drive. The primary researcher was solely responsible for transcribing the interview content. All materials, such as notes, recordings, and transcriptions, are securely stored and won’t be made public. They will be appropriately disposed of three years after the study concludes. While there was no financial compensation for taking part, participants have the option to request a copy of the research outcomes.
Data collection
The researcher will initiate the project by reaching out through emails, or phone call to determine and communicate with study participants. Participants were self-chosen with the knowledge that their involvement would be voluntary, their responses anonymous, and their information held in confidentiality by the research committee. The researcher was hopeful that the demographic variety chosen for the study, as well as the participants’ wide range of experience in leadership, would help achieve saturation of the categories and themes of the topic for the study. The recruiting email (Appendix B) will distribute to the participants during a six-month period through their individual email accounts to allow time for their responses. Participants will be sent a hyperlink created for these research instruments via web-based software, along with a letter approved by Pepperdine and the IRB Review Board requesting consent to participate but will also outline the fact that participants are under no obligation to complete surveys or questionnaires against their will (Pepperdine IRB Manual, 2009, p. 22).
Concurrently, emails will be sent to study participants that included dates and times to choose from for interviews on relevant subject matter and interviews will be conducted during subsequent months. An attached IRB Consent form will be sent to be signed and returned to the research project before commencement of the interview questioning. The consent form will be evidence that precaution had been taken to protect participants’ rights as mandated by the IRB Review Board. The researcher will conduct interviews using the interview instrument that was provided, which was also designed with open-ended questions for further development of responses. The researcher also will encourage relevant conversation which sometimes might go beyond the scope of the interview questions in efforts to delve deeper into topics that will be presented. Interviews will be schedule for 30-45-minute time slots. The interview process will therefore be constructed as follows:
Copies of interview questions will be forwarded to participants through email in advance to provide to these individuals a few days to reflect on the responses they will give. An Interview Form will be use by the researcher to notate information given during the interview process and use of this template assured that the same interview procedures were followed for each participant. The Interview Form included information pertaining to each individual’s level of experience in leadership, and the interview questions it will contain were developed from information garnered from the literature review of the study, and from the researcher’s personal knowledge of the subject, following an initial three-step process (Prima Facie, Peer Review, and Expert Review) to establish validity. Research and interview questions were designed to address aims of the study, and to elicit important information concerning perspectives and reflections regarding positive affect and effective leadership. The interview process will provide open-ended questions which had been structured to enable participants the chance to expand on their own personal experiences regarding the main issues of the study. The information that will be gathered from these experienced leaders during this process greatly helped to elicit valuable knowledge that has further shed light on the relationship with positive affect and leadership effectiveness The 12 interview questions that were designed for interview purposes can be found in Table 1.
Twelve interview questions were used in efforts to satisfy both the research questions and the overall purpose of the study. They are as follows:
The investigator of the study will consistently evaluate the content validity of the results by reviewing both qualitative data and any pertinent records or archived materials connected to the study. This involved a regular analysis of historical contexts and a detailed examination of qualitative data to deeply understand participants’ answers and relevant documents. To ensure data accuracy and reliability, the researcher will employ triangulation, merging qualitative analyses with interview responses for a more coherent interpretation of the data and to address research questions effectively (Creswell, 2014). The recruitment follow-up and the interview tools were designed to tackle the subjects raised in the research questions. Before being used in the study, these tools could be scrutinized by the researcher’s dissertation committee to check for potential bias or shortcomings in their design. The reliability of these data-gathering tools will be confirmed through a three-tiered validation process, which ensured the proper alignment of research questions and related interview questions, and are described as follows:
The term “prima facie,” originating from Latin, refers to something recognized “at first glance” (Cornell University Law, 2016, p. 1). When used adverbially, it means “at first sight, but open to further evidence or clarification” (Cornell University Law, 2016, p. 1). The researcher applied this prima facie concept to frame the research, basing it on the current understanding of the study topic. As the study progressed, the gathering of new information could potentially modify this initial validity, with fresh insights potentially reshaping current views. The first step in establishing prima facie validity involved crafting a chart that linked the primary research questions with their corresponding interview questions, geared towards illuminating the study’s key subjects. The study’s foundational framework was built upon these twelve initial questions, presented here in their prima facie context:
To ensure an external evaluation of the study’s process, the researcher will provide a peer review for validity by sharing the interview questions with past and current doctoral students in the dissertation program at Pepperdine University. These students were previous enrolled in Pepperdine’s EDOL Program and brought expertise from diverse industries to their doctoral research endeavors. Their deep understanding of both qualitative and quantitative research methods, as well as other research designs, equipped them to effectively evaluate fellow students’ doctoral projects. They utilized their knowledge to assess the validity and credibility of both the research and interview questions in each project. Every doctoral candidate’s responsibility was to scrutinize and determine the coherence between the research questions, interview questions, and the overall aim of the study being evaluated. For this process, the doctoral group will be provided copies of the original research and interview questions.
During a group session via Zoom, they were asked to voice whether each question should be (a) retained as is, (b) removed, or (c) adjusted as recommended. If changes were deemed essential, members were encouraged to suggest alternative phrasing for the questions. The final step for the reliability and validity process for each project hinges on the feedback from the dissertation committee. After reviewing the peer session’s suggestions, the committee either ratifies these recommendations or returns the research and interview questions to the doctoral group for revisions. Once all proposed changes are addressed and a doctoral student receives the nod of approval for their research and interview questions from the committee, they can proceed confidently in their research journey. This assurance stems from the knowledge that each question has undergone rigorous scrutiny by both their peers and the doctoral committee. The final recommendations, derived from the three-fold process of prima facie validity, peer review, and expert assessment by the committee, are detailed below, presenting the final twelve, semi-structured interview questions employed in the study:
Bias can not only distort outcomes and influence decision-making. It’s crucial to minimize bias in any form of research, including qualitative studies, as it can compromise the study’s accuracy and credibility by altering data and misrepresenting facts. In qualitative research, there are five primary areas susceptible to bias:
The researcher will operate under the assumption that participants would provide candid and genuine responses, free from misleading beliefs or prejudiced viewpoints. The data collected during the study hinges on the recollections and perceptions of the participants; hence, it was essential to trust that their shared memories and insights were both accurate and sincere. Committed to maintaining the highest level of objectivity, the investigator aims for a balanced analysis of the study’s issues. The goal was to present the findings without prejudice or bias, striving to produce a body of work that was authentic, transparent, and free from the biases previously mentioned.
The researcher attempts to approach the study with a fresh lens by setting aside his personal experiences with positive affect and leadership styles. This was achieved using the bracketing (epoch) technique, where everything is viewed “as if seen for the first time” (Moustakas, 1994, p. 34). While focusing solely on the participants’ experiences and not on his own understanding of positive affect and leadership styles, the researcher didn’t erase his past experiences but ensured they didn’t overshadow the new insights garnered from participants. This approach minimized bias and pre-existing notions, granting the investigator a clearer, unbiased viewpoint. It ensured that established beliefs did not cloud the observations and interpretations unique to this study.
Through a thorough review of documentation and descriptive interviews with follow-up questions, the primary investigator hoped to gain a more substantial understanding of the impact of positive affect on leadership styles. Following initial contact of possible participants in the study, a semi-structured interview protocol will create a record of personal narratives reflective of the perspectives of positive affect and their leadership styles. This sequential research methodology process will enable the researcher to identify emerging patterns and themes that will validate the findings of the study. The interview process is essential method of qualitative research. For a deeper understanding from the selected study group, open-ended interviews will be carried out, providing participants a conducive environment to share their experiences (Creswell, 2013; Roberts, 2010).
The questions that will be crafted by the researcher will intentionally be open-ended, aligning with the phenomenological approach to capture participants’ genuine perspectives and enabling deeper exploration of pertinent topics. This open format doesn’t just allow for comprehensive answers but also promotes richer dialogue, which in turn can surface more significant insights during the interview. Following the interviews, the analysis phase will focus with the coding and transcription of the recordings, facilitating a clearer grasp of the data and paving the way for insightful interpretations. To manage the extensive data effectively, an organized framework will be implemented during this initial analysis phase. The entire research process will span six months, accommodating participants’ schedules and ensuring meticulous data gathering.
Conducting a qualitative phenomenological research design to investigate the relationship between positive affect and effective leadership requires specific tools and methodologies to ensure rigorous data collection and analysis. One of the primary tools in this regard is the use of in-depth interviews. These interviews allow researchers to gather rich, detailed data by engaging participants in a dialogue where they can share their personal experiences and perceptions related to leadership and positive emotions. The success of these interviews depends on the interviewer’s skills and the development of a comprehensive interview guide, which should be carefully crafted to elicit deep insights while remaining open to emergent themes (Smith & Osborn, 2008). Additionally, participant observation and document analysis can supplement interviews, providing a more nuanced understanding of the phenomenon by capturing non-verbal cues and contextual factors (Creswell & Poth, 2018).
Analyzing the data gathered from these qualitative methods needs a organized approach, where thematic analysis is a great robust tool. Thematic analysis entails the identification, analysis, and reporting of themes within data. It is a flexible method that allows a rich and detailed, yet complex account of data (Braun & Clarke, 2006). Braun and Clarke’s work on thematic analysis is especially instrumental in guiding researchers through this process. The Delve tool, a qualitative data analysis software, can substantially assist in managing and analyzing large volumes of qualitative data. The tool enables researchers to code data efficiently, arrange codes into meaningful themes, and visualize relationships between themes. It enhances the rigor and transparency of the thematic analysis process, making it easier to follow the development of themes and warrant that the analysis is grounded in the data.
Through reading and memoing, the researcher can deeply immerse themselves in the study. These techniques involve the researcher noting down evolving ideas during the various coding processes, as described by Creswell (2013, p. 89). This analytical stage will allow the primary investigator to thoroughly examine all data, from transcriptions to field notes and the quick memos written amidst active research, enhancing their grasp of the insights within the data (Creswell, 2014). Gathering such comprehensive data can empower the researcher to identify overarching themes and patterns in the study.
Creswell (2014) defines coding as “the act of segmenting data and assigning labels to these chunks, in essence categorizing the data” (p. 98). This third step in the coding journey is pivotal in sifting through vast swathes of data to make it digestible, allowing for the identification of key themes and patterns that shape the study’s narrative. In this research, the qualitative analysis will be extracted from the interview outcomes and pertinent documents. These insights will be coded to unearth overarching themes. As the study will progress, emerging categories, patterns, and themes will be further examined using coding techniques. This will help in understanding the connections between different factors and in deepening the comprehension of the primary issue tackled in the research (Creswell, 2013). The coding process incorporated measures of interrater reliability and validity to pinpoint these themes and patterns, detailed in the ensuing section.
Marques and McCall (2005) define interrater reliability as the alignment in judgment when “two or more people (coders or raters) concur” (p. 442) on a data collection method. Creswell (2013) emphasizes the need for this to ensure that coded data is accurately depicted. To bolster the credibility and applicability of this study, the investigator will use external validity, which enables findings to resonate across varied research domains, by incorporating peer and expert review of the coded data (Creswell, 2013). The study’s head adopted a tri-step interrater reliability approach to guarantee consistent data management and authenticate the research outcomes:
The final step in the coding process focuses on distilling a cohesive story from the data analysis (Creswell, 2014). This qualitative analysis reporting procedure is designed to not only extract themes and patterns from the amassed data but also to convey these insights through narratives, charts, or graphs, “that convey multiple perspectives and detailed descriptions of the setting or individuals” (Creswell, 2014, p. 204). The essence of the qualitative study lies in its ability to chronicle the problem’s evolution, unearth emerging themes or patterns, validate these findings, and suggest innovative solutions to the addressed issue. The aim is usually to foster new understanding, with this representational and visualization phase serving as its expression.
This chapter has described research methods that the investigator employed to determine the impact of positive affect and effective leadership. The chapter discussed the researcher’s worldview as pertains to the study, and identified the chosen phenomenological, qualitative, and research design that was utilized for the study. The research questions were restated, and data collection and analysis methods were also discussed, providing a detailed description of the population and sample framework which comprised the study based on defined elements for inclusion or exclusion in the research project. Consideration was given to the protection of human subjects, as IRB requirements will be reviewed.
The design of the interview protocol for the research was explained, with a discussion concerning the specifics of the way each interview question was related to each research question, highlighting the significance of inter-rater reliability and validity measures used to verify the soundness of the data-collection method. The chapter outlines the interview process that was set forth for the research project and suggests the most effective techniques used in securing successful interviews. Finally, the chapter concludes with a description of the four step process that the investigator will employ to test the validity and reliability of data collected. The research project will examine the phenomenon of the relationship between positive affect and leadership effectiveness. The benefits to the study include insights gained through qualitative analysis that are interpreted through a phenomenological lens which can assist leaders in embracing and including positive affect in their training and organization.
Chapter 4: Findings
The overarching purpose of this study is to explore the phenomenological impact of positive affect on leadership effectiveness. By employing a qualitative research design, this investigation seeks to understand, from the perspectives of leaders themselves, how positivity influences their ability to lead effectively. This focus addresses the research question: How does positive affect impact leadership effectiveness? The inquiry centers on capturing and interpreting the lived experiences of leaders who prioritize and exhibit positive affect in their leadership practices. The insights derived from this study aim to enhance our theoretical and practical understanding of the dynamics between emotional positivity and leadership outcomes.
Positive affect, as defined in this context, encompasses a range of positive emotions and attitudes such as joy, enthusiasm, and confidence, which leaders exhibit and leverage to inspire and motivate their teams. The influence of such positive emotional expressions on leadership effectiveness has been suggested in various psychological and organizational studies. For instance, research by Fredrickson (2001) and her Broaden-and-Build Theory of positive emotions provides a foundational understanding of how positive emotions can expand cognitive, social, and physical resources, leading to superior performance and resilience in organizations (Fredrickson, 2001). Similarly, studies by George (2000) emphasize how positive moods predispose leaders to be more cooperative, supportive, and to perceive more options in decision-making processes (George, 2000). This chapter explores the thoughts and concerns of 10 participants chosen for this study as they responded to 12 interview questions on the topic of “Leading with Positivity: A Phenomenological Study of Affect and Leadership Effectiveness.”
The structure of this chapter, which presents the study’s findings, is organized as follows:
Interview Questions
The pivotal role of intensive interviewing in phenomenological research is underscored by Gibbs, Kealy, Willis, et al., in the Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, who argue that the methods employed in sampling and data gathering are crucial for the integrity and applicability of a study’s outcomes (Gibbs, Kealy, Willis, Green, Welch, & Daly, (2007). Central to this investigation, the primary research questions were meticulously developed to lay the groundwork for the study. In addition, a set of 12 supplementary interview questions was crafted to probe deeper into the themes of the research. These questions, upon receiving approval from the dissertation committee overseeing this research, became the foundation for the semi-structured interviews conducted with the selected 10 leaders. This approach was instrumental in enriching our understanding of positivity in leadership and in capturing the nuanced impact of such leadership styles within various organizational settings, as narrated through the leaders’ own experiences and reflections.
The study’s design mandated that participants possess a minimum of seven years of leadership or managerial experience across various industries, as outlined in the IRB Consent Form found in Appendix C. During the interviews, each participant offered insightful and candid reflections on their leadership journey within their respective organizations or businesses. The narratives and insights gleaned from these discussions were instrumental in shaping the study’s findings. Every contribution enriched the research by shedding light on the intricate ways in which emotions and positivity influence leadership styles. The data collected from these 10 insightful interviews were meticulously categorized into themes, enhancing the depth of our understanding of the shared experiences. The ensuing sections of this chapter will detail this thematic analysis, presenting a coherent interpretation of the study’s results and elucidating the significant interaction between positive affect and leadership effectiveness as revealed through our research.
Participants
The researcher conducted most of the interviews via telephone or WhatsApp instead of face-face method since several of subjects were out of county or state. The researcher was successful reached 10 willing participants from various businesses or organizations. These participants were meticulously chosen using a purposive sampling technique, ensuring they had direct experience with the core phenomena of interest and could offer valuable insights into the interaction between positive affect and effective leadership (Creswell, 2007). Another surprising factor that developed from the interview process was that saturation was reached after the researcher had interviewed 10 participants; that is, many of the same themes and reflections began to emerge from the interviewees, with minimal new insights and discoveries. Hopefully, with the blessing of the dissertation committee, they will decide that because of the saturation factor, 10 participants would serve as the threshold for the research study. The choice of participant (unit of analysis) for the study was determined by the following criteria:
Data Collection
Through the semi-structured interview process, the researcher collected data and personal insights from 10 mid- to high-level management and leaders at various businesses and organizations. As stated in the previous section, the original goal was to reach 10 participants who had experience in managerial or leadership positions in U.S. companies. However, after conducting interviews with 10 participants chosen for the study, the researcher determined that the research project had reached saturation, as many common themes and thoughts contributed by the study members began to take on a similar aspect. The researcher, therefore, decided that enough relevant and compelling information had been gleaned from the 10 interviewees to finalize the project and determine the major implications of the study. After initially reaching business owners and leaders in various industries the investigator contacted leaders at these organizations by email, utilizing the Institutional Review Board (IRB)- approved email message to spark these individuals’ interest. Once successful contact was made with any particular individual, the researcher sent an introductory IRB-approved email with a description of the study and its requirements for participation (Appendix C), the IRB Approval Form for the study (Appendix A), the 12 Interview Questions that would be used in an interview session (Appendix D), an IRB Consent Form to be signed and returned via email if the individual was interested in participating in the research project (Appendix B). If the individual complied with the requirements for the study and offered to be a participant, a date was set for either a face-to-face or telephone/WhatsApp interview at the time of the participant’s convenience. Once the interview time was determined, the researcher called the individual by telephone at the agreed date and time. The investigator of the study recorded the participant’s responses on both a digital-tape recorder, and a podcast digital recorder to ensure that the conversation was successfully chronicled for research purposes. No interview went over the allotted 30–60-minute timeframe, and the semi-structured interview process allowed for the interviewer to subsequently ask follow-up questions once the 12 Interview Questions were exhausted, and many of the participants’ responses to these follow-up question shed additional light on topics discussed, providing valuable insight to the study.
Table 1
Dates of Participants Interviews
| Participant ID | Interview Date |
| P1 | June 8, 2024 |
| P2 | June 9, 2024 |
| P3 | June 9, 2024 |
| P4 | June 10, 2024 |
| P5 | June 15, 2024 |
| P6 | June 15, 2024 |
| P7 | June 17, 2024 |
| P8 | June 17, 2024 |
| P9 | June 20, 2024 |
| P10 | June 22, 2024 |
This table is intended to maintain confidentiality while ensuring accurate documentation of each participation’s interview schedule for the study. The researcher utilized the 12 Interview Questions to collect data and participants’ individual perspectives based on their first-hand knowledge and lived experiences with positive emotions and leadership effectiveness. The interview process took place between the month of June 2024, and data collection, transcription, and coding of the material was accomplished within a one-month period from the time the interviewing period ended. The interview process, along with personal notations that the investigator took during the interviews, formed the basis of the themes culled from the voluminous material.
The researcher and researcher assistance acted were the transcriber of the interview recordings and reviewed the audio recordings three times each to ensure accuracy and consistency during the transcribing process. The investigator retains signed consent forms for the audio-recording of the interviews from all participants, and all digital recordings have been stored on an MP3 flash-drive device and are safely stored (along with the digital tapes at his place of residence. Pseudonyms were used in place of the participants’ names to protect their identities for confidentiality purposes, and all audio files and cassettes, in addition to transcriptions of interviews, will be destroyed by the researcher after a three-year waiting period has passed, as recommended by the Pepperdine University Institutional Review Board (2015).
Data Analysis
Data analysis “should advance the purposeful sampling approach and the forms of data to be collected” (Creswell, 2014, p. 212), and observations, interviews, documents, and any other source of information can greatly contribute to the wealth of data that is generally collected and analyzed during the research phase of a qualitative study. As Creswell (2014) maintains, data analysis is constant during the research process, and it often involves “analyzing participant information, …organizing and preparing the data, …reading through the information, coding the data, developing from the codes a description and thematic analysis, using computer-generated programs, representing the findings in tables, graphs, and figures, and interpreting the findings” (p. 212). The final interpretation of a study may include stated lessons that have been learned, comparisons of the results to past studies or theoretical information, questions that have come to light, or a call to action for reform or to meet an agenda. The final stage of research (saturation) is generally realized when categories or themes have been exhausted and no new significant insights or discoveries can be identified (Charmaz, 2014). For this study, the data was analyzed, transcribed, and coded in efforts to find common themes among the participants that might shed light on the topic of positive emotion and leadership effectiveness, and these coded themes became foundational in constructing a final interpretation of the research project, articulated in Chapter 5 of this document. The semi- structured interview process served as the basis of the data collection phase, whereby the researcher gathered information and reflections concerning the lived experiences of the participants regarding positive affect and leadership effectiveness. The researcher transcribed the interviews on individual Word documents, employing the process of memoing, when necessary, by writing down thoughts and ideas concerning the information gathered to add dimension to the material provided. The investigator listened to the recordings three times each during the transcribing process, and any identifying information about the participants or their institutions that may have been stated in the recorded information was eliminated from the written transcripts of the conversations to protect their identities. The researcher adhered to a policy of bracketing to suspend any pre-conceived notions and precepts concerning positive affect and leadership effectiveness and approach the research topic from a fresh perspective (Creswell, 2013). Occurrences and frequencies of themes were then analyzed to find similar, or dissimilar, patterns among the responses collected to enable the researcher to accurately interpret the data and report the findings of the study for posterity.
Interrater Review Process
In efforts to secure validity for the data collected during the study, an interrater review process was adopted for the first three of the 10 interviews that took place. As previously stated in Chapter 3, securing a measure of external validity allows the research findings of a particular study to be sourced for other research studies. To prevent threats to external validity, a researcher must ensure that personal bias does not taint his or her conclusive interpretations of any research study and verify that information gleaned from the project is truly free of personal partiality and usable for other research investigations. The researcher brings a construction of reality to the research situation, which interacts with other people’s constructions or interpretations of the phenomenon being studied. The final product of this type of study is yet another interpretation by the researcher of others’ views filtered through his or her own. (Merriam, 1998, p. 2) As Merriam implies, the researcher still interprets findings of a study’s proceedings through his or her own personal lens; however, by employing rigorous methods to ascertain external validity, conclusive evidence is more purely constructed through a process of disciplined inquiry (Yazan, 2015).
The researcher employed a two-step method to establish inter-rater reliability and thereby prevent threats to the external validity of the study’s findings. First, the researcher transcribed and coded the initial three interviews to begin identifying themes for the study. Next, two inter-raters—a student from the Pepperdine University Graduate School of Education and Psychology (GSEP) Doctoral Program and a graduate student—volunteered to review the coding results of these first three interviews. After reaching consensus with the inter-raters on the coding approach and modifying some of the theme names that had emerged during the coding process based on their suggestions, the researcher proceeded to implement the agreed-upon coding method for the remainder of the interviews. The inter-raters remained available for any additional review or feedback needed throughout the rest of the coding process. Initially, a color-coded Excel spreadsheet, which included themes outlined from the first three interviews, was shared with the inter-raters. One of the assistants was familiar with the process and had extensive training in qualitative research and coding practices. Both individuals reviewed the theme-based coding sheet in Excel to verify the validity of the coding process. To maintain confidentiality, no identifiable information about the participants was included in the Excel spreadsheet. The inter-raters analyzed the data independently and provided suggestions as they deemed appropriate. The alterations to the previous themes to the coded information suggested by the inter-raters were as follows:
IQ 3: Themes of Creating a Supportive Environment, Emotional Intelligence, Inspiring Positivity.
From this procedure, more specific themes emerged that addressed the overarching Research Question and the 12 Interview Questions more fully. Individual themes were deemed useful to the study if at least two participants involved with the project identified them as being important.
Data Display
The study was framed by the principal Research Question, and 12 Interview Questions were developed from their context to further mine any data collected through the participants responses concerning leader’s positive affect and leadership effectiveness. A total of 32 themes emerged from the analysis of the transcribed interview material, and the themes are subsequently discussed in the following pages as each correlate to their individual corresponding Research Question. Participants in the study are referred to as P1, P2, P3, etc., for confidentiality, and interviewees’ reflections on their lived experiences of being a leader in their industry are denoted by quoted material drawn from the interview process, and from the researcher’s own interpretation of the data presented.
Research Question 1
RQ 1: How does positive affect impact leadership effectiveness?
Interview question 1. IQ 1: Can you please provide a brief overview of your professional background and your current role? Diverse Professional Backgrounds: Participants come from a variety of industries and roles, ranging from education and healthcare to finance and technology.
The participant, P1, is a 45-year-old Persian female with a master’s degree. She is married with three children and works as a School Administrator in the education industry. P1 has 15 years of experience in her field and is employed at a medium-sized organization located in Los Angeles. She identifies as middle class in terms of socioeconomic status.
Participant 2 (P2) is a 42-year-old Japanese male who holds a bachelor’s degree. He is the President of a small, private startup company in the technology industry, based in San Francisco. P2 is single with one child and has 8 years of experience in his current role. The organization he leads is small, reflecting the early stage of the startup. Participant 3 (P3) is a 55-year-old Caucasian male with a bachelor’s degree. He works in Finance at a large international bank located in Palm Springs. P3 is single with one child and has 25 years of experience in his field. He belongs to the upper class, reflecting his socioeconomic status. Participant 4 (P4) is a 58-year-old Vietnamese female with a high school education. She is a healthcare manager with 15 years of experience working in a medium-sized private healthcare organization located in Orange County. P4 is married with three children and belongs to the upper middle class, reflecting her socioeconomic status. P4: Healthcare Manager, dedicated to improving patient care and staff morale. Advocates for open communication and support within the team. Participant 5 (P5) is a 60-year-old Indian male with a master’s degree. He serves as the Vice President of a bank and has accumulated 35 years of experience in his field. P5 is employed at a medium-sized public company based in Los Angeles. He is married with two children and is categorized within the upper-middle-class socioeconomic status. P5: Vice President of a bank, specializing in trust-building and employee engagement. Focuses on creating a supportive and inclusive work environment. Participant (P6) is a 33-year-old African American female. She holds a bachelor’s degree and is divorced with two children. P6 works as a Marketing Director in the advertising industry, with 8 years of experience. She is employed at a small private company located in San Diego and belongs to the middle-class socioeconomic status. P6: Marketing Director with a keen interest in emotional agility and adaptive leadership. Known for successfully navigating complex emotional landscapes within the team. Participant 7 (P7) is a 38-year-old Latino male with a high school education. He is divorced with no children. P7 works as the President of a construction company, with 16 years of experience in the industry. He is employed at a small private company located in Orange County and belongs to the upper-class socioeconomic status. P7: Construction Manager, emphasizing resilience and positivity in managing projects and teams. Has extensive experience in handling high-pressure situations. Participant 8 (P8) is a 38-year-old Caucasian female with a bachelor’s degree. She is married with two children and works in the non-profit sector, specifically within a religious organization. P8 holds the position of Nonprofit Leader (Director) and has 16 years of experience in her field. She is employed at a medium-sized non-profit organization located in Los Angeles and belongs to the middle-class socioeconomic status. P8: Non-Profit Leader, focusing on empathy and action in leadership. Dedicated to fostering a supportive and cohesive team environment. Participant 9 (P9) is a 30-year-old Caucasian female with a Doctorate degree. She is single and works as a psychologist in the field of psychology. P9 has 8 years of experience and is employed in a large government organization located in Los Angeles. She belongs to the middle-class socioeconomic status. P9: Mental Health Expert, specializing in conflict resolution and positive communication. Works extensively with teams to manage stress and improve workplace dynamics. Participant 10 (P10) is a 52-year-old Caucasian male with a high school education. He is divorced with five children and works in the service industry, specifically in molding, as a business owner. P10 has 25 years of experience and operates a medium-sized private company located in Oregon. He belongs to the upper-middle-class socioeconomic status. P10: Business Owner with a focus on inspirational motivation and cultivating a positive work culture. Known for recognizing and celebrating team achievements. P10 mentioned, “I’ve been immersed in the real estate and molding sectors for a good 25 years. My journey has spanned various facets of these industries, from hands-on property management to strategic planning and development.”
Interview questions 2. How many years of leadership experience do you have?
The participants in this study possess extensive leadership experience, often accumulated over several decades. This wealth of experience is a testament to their enduring commitment to leadership roles and continuous evolution as leaders. Most participants reported over 15 years of leadership experience, with many exceeding that benchmark. Over half of the participants have over 25 years of experience in various leadership capacities. This depth of experience reflects not only the longevity of their careers but also their ability to adapt and grow in response to the ever-changing demands of leadership. Many participants emphasized that their journey as leaders has been continuous learning and development. They highlighted the importance of evolving their leadership styles and approaches over time, driven by both personal growth and the changing needs of their teams and organizations. This long-term commitment to leadership underscores the participants’ dedication to refining their skills, expanding their influence, and making a sustained impact within their respective fields. P1 stated, “Leadership is a practice. No one is faultless. Human nature combines successes and failures, so a leader is not far from that.”
Interview question 3. How would you define ‘positive affect’ in a leadership context? Three themes arose in response to IQ3: (a) creating supportive environment, (b) emotional intelligence, & (c) inspiring positivity. balancing leadership approaches. (see Figure 3)
Figure 3. Themes that emerged from IQ 3: How would you define ‘positive affect’ in a leadership context?
Creating Supportive Environment. Creating a supportive environment emerged as the most frequently mentioned theme when defining positive affect in leadership. Leaders emphasized fostering a work environment where team members feel valued, supported, and motivated. This environment promotes employee well-being and enhances team cohesion and productivity. By prioritizing support and encouragement, leaders can create a positive atmosphere that facilitates collaboration, creativity, and collective success.
Positive affect is often linked to creating a work environment where team members feel valued, supported, and motivated. Participant 2 (P2) articulated this connection: “When you are in a work environment where the leadership focuses on making you feel valued and positive, it changes everything.” This perspective underscores the transformative power of positive leadership, which can shift the entire workplace atmosphere, making it more conducive to individual and collective success.
Emotional intelligence. Emotional intelligence was another significant theme, highlighting the role of a leader’s ability to recognize, understand, and manage their own emotions and those of their team members. Leaders who exhibit high emotional intelligence are better equipped to handle the complexities of interpersonal relationships, build trust, and navigate challenging situations with empathy. This emotional awareness contributes to an upbeat leadership style that inspires confidence and fosters a resilient team. P2 further emphasized the significance of positive affect in leadership, noting, “Positive affect is all about creating an environment where people feel valued and motivated. It is about ensuring that everyone feels supported and able to contribute their best.” Leaders who embody positive affect are often perceived as emotionally intelligent and capable of nurturing strong relationships and building trust within their teams. This ability to foster a positive and supportive environment is critical for driving engagement and collaboration.
As P8 highlighted, “Leaders who maintain a positive effect create a work environment where optimism and growth thrive, promoting openness, trust, and collaboration.” This observation was exemplified in the actions of P4, who consistently demonstrated these qualities, fostering a workplace culture characterized by positivity, inclusivity, and shared success.
“A leader with positive affect shows high emotional intelligence by being in tune with their team’s emotions and needs. They can foster trust and build strong relationships through empathy and understanding. “Positive affect reflects a leader’s ability to manage their emotions effectively, which in turn influences the emotional tone of the entire team. (Participant 2).
Inspiring positivity. Inspiring positivity was identified as a critical aspect of positive affect in leadership. Leaders who maintain a positive outlook, even in difficult circumstances, can uplift their teams and instill a sense of optimism and possibility. This positive energy is contagious, helping to motivate team members and create a work environment where challenges are seen as opportunities for growth. Leaders can cultivate a culture of resilience and determination by consistently demonstrating positivity. Positive affect in leadership extends beyond merely fostering a supportive environment; it also involves inspiring and maintaining a positive outlook, even in the face of challenges. Participant 6 (P6) emphasized this point, stating, “Leadership is not just about leading others; it is about leading oneself through constant self-evaluation and growth, making positive affect not just a strategy but a core part of who you are as a leader.” This perspective highlights the intrinsic nature of positive effect ineffective leadership, where maintaining a positive mindset is essential for both personal development and team influence. Participant 10 (P10) reinforced this idea by noting, “Positive affect is about maintaining a positive outlook, even in challenging situations. It inspires others to stay hopeful and keep moving forward.” This sentiment underscores the role of positive affect in keeping the team motivated and resilient, particularly during difficult times. P8 further elaborated, stating, “When a leader has a positive effect, it radiates through the team, inspiring them to be optimistic and resilient in the face of difficulties.” This observation illustrates the contagious nature of positive affect in leadership—when leaders embody positivity, it spreads throughout the team, encouraging a collective sense of optimism and determination to overcome obstacles. This ability to inspire resilience and a hopeful outlook is a defining characteristic of leaders who effectively leverage positive affect in their leadership approach.
Interview question 4.What leadership style (Transformational. Transactional, and authentic) do you primarily identify with? Can you share why? 8 themes arose response to IQ 4: (a) honesty and integrity, (b) transparency & genuineness, (c) building trust and inclusivity, (d) inspiring and motivating others (e) vision and creativity, (f) clear Expectations and accountability, (g) blending transactional with personal touch, (h) adjusting to the situation and person. (see figure 2).
Figure 2. Themes that emerged from IQ 4: What leadership style (Transformational. Transactional, and authentic) do you primarily identify with? Can you share why?
Honesty and integrity. Six participants emphasized that honesty and integrity are fundamental to their leadership style. They believe that being truthful and transparent in their interactions is essential for building trust within the team and fostering a culture of openness. One participant stated, “I am an honest leader. Honesty starts within. Honesty is looking at myself in the mirror and being proud of myself. Honesty is not feeling guilty about my decisions.”
Transparency and genuineness. Five participants identified transparency and genuineness as critical qualities of authentic leadership. They noted that being genuine in their approach helps build deeper connections with their team, creating a more inclusive and supportive work environment. One participant (P10) shared, “My leadership identity is authentic. In fashion, one true sense of style is being authentic with the brand and lifestyle of our brand… keeping it real is my whole thing, especially in the fashion world. You have got to have that genuine flair, right? That is what makes or breaks a brand.”
Building Trust and inclusivity. Building trust and inclusivity was a significant theme, with seven participants agreeing that these elements are vital to their leadership approach. They emphasized the importance of fostering an inclusive atmosphere where all team members feel valued, enhancing collaboration and overall team performance. One participant (P7) remarked, “Authentic leadership resonates with me the most, reflecting my core values of honesty, integrity, and transparency. This style empowers me to lead with self-awareness and empathy, build trust through open communication, and commit to ethical practices.”
Inspiring and motivating others. The most frequently mentioned theme, with eight participants, was the importance of inspiring and motivating others. These leaders stressed that their primary role is to encourage their teams to reach their full potential by setting an example and providing opportunities for growth and development. As one participant (P1) expressed, “Transformational – I believe that trust, empathy, and being a role model people want to follow are some of the most important aspects of leadership. Instilling trust inevitably results in the ability to inspire my team because they know they are valued and appreciated.”
Vision and creativity. Four participants discussed the role of vision and creativity in their leadership style. They can guide their teams toward achieving innovative solutions and long-term goals by providing a clear vision and encouraging creative thinking. One participant (P8) explained, “Once trust has been established, I inspire their creativity by striving to provide a clear vision of the shared goals.”
Clear expectations and accountability. Six participants highlighted the necessity of setting clear expectations and holding team members accountable. They argued that this approach helps maintain high standards and ensures everyone is aligned with the organization’s objectives. One participant (P10) noted, “My leadership style gravitates towards transactional leadership, but with a unique personal touch. I believe in clear expectations, accountability, and rewards for performance.”
Blending Transactional with Personal Touch Three participants mentioned blending transactional leadership with a personal touch. They explained that while they value structure and clear expectations, they also believe in personal recognition and appreciation, which enhances team motivation and cohesion. One participant (P7) stated, “I also deeply value the human aspect of leadership—treating team members with care, recognizing their efforts personally, and sometimes, surprising them with tokens of appreciation.”
Adjusting to Situation and Person. Four participants recognized the need to adjust their leadership style based on the situation and the individual team members. They stressed the importance of being flexible and responsive to the unique needs of their team to achieve the best outcomes. One participant (P3) said, “I am an ambivert who can lead people based on their personalities. I will adjust and adapt based on the person and use all the styles effectively. People may or may not respond to these styles based on their personalities, so I try to understand them before deploying a style for them.”
Interview question 5. Can you describe a time when you observed or experienced the impact of ‘positive affect’ in leadership? Twelve major themes arose in response to question IQ5: (a) feeling valued and supported (b) team cohesion & collaboration (c) encouraging contributions (d) understanding & addressing needs (e) building trust and relationships (f) instilling confidence & enthusiasm (g) creating positive energy and enthusiasm (h) motivating and energizing the team (i) promoting 0ptimism and growth (j) continuous improvement and self-evaluation (k) sustaining as a leader (l) impact beyond the team.
Figure 3. Themes that emerged from IQ 5: Can you describe a time when you observed or experienced the impact of ‘positive affect’ in leadership?
Feeling Valued and Supported. Seven participants emphasized the importance of feeling valued and supported in a work environment. They noted that when leadership focuses on making employees feel valued, it transforms the workplace into a more positive and uplifting space. One participant (P8) shared, “When you are in a work environment where the leadership focuses on making you feel valued and positive, it changes everything. You wake up looking forward to the day… It is not just about the job anymore; it is about being part of a team, a family almost, that supports and uplifts each other.”
Team Cohesion and Collaboration. Six participants highlighted the role of positive affect in fostering team cohesion and collaboration. Leaders who create a supportive atmosphere promote motivation, satisfaction, and engagement among team members. One participant (P6) noted, “Leaders who manifest positive affect effectively create a supportive and encouraging work atmosphere, promoting employee motivation, satisfaction, and engagement.”
Encouraging Contribution. Five participants discussed how positive leadership encourages team members to go beyond their assigned tasks and actively contribute more to the team. As one participant (P1) expressed, “You are not just doing your tasks; you are actively looking for ways to contribute more, to bring something new to the table.”
Understanding and Addressing Needs. Four participants emphasized the importance of leaders understanding and addressing the needs of their teams. They highlighted that positive affect in leadership is crucial for creating an environment where everyone feels genuinely happy and supported. One participant (P5) remarked, “Positive affect in leadership is all about creating an environment where everyone—my team, colleagues, clients—feels genuinely happy and supported.”
Building Trust and Relationships. Seven participants agreed that building trust and strong relationships is essential in leadership. They noted that a leader’s influence goes beyond instructions or strategic decisions, setting an emotional tone that fosters a cohesive, innovative, and productive team environment. “Their influence extends beyond mere instructions or strategic decisions; it involves setting an emotional tone that fosters a cohesive, innovative, and productive team environment,” one participant (P5) shared.
Instilling Confidence and Enthusiasm. Six participants discussed how positive affect in leadership is about more than just maintaining a cheerful disposition: it is about instilling confidence and enthusiasm within the team. One participant (P3) stated, “In the context of leadership, ‘positive affect’ is about more than just a cheerful disposition. It is about instilling confidence, enthusiasm, and a sense of possibility within the team.”
Creating Positive Energy and Enthusiasm. Eight participants emphasized that positive affect is central to creating an environment full of energy and enthusiasm. Leaders who instill confidence and a sense of possibility are vital to this process. “Positive affect is about instilling confidence, enthusiasm, and a sense of possibility within the team,” one participant (P6) noted.
Motivating and Energizing the Team. Six participants discussed how leaders who maintain a positive effect motivate and energize their teams, creating a dynamic and productive work environment. One participant (P9) described this impact: “They make the whole team vibe together, innovate, and get things done. These leaders are the team’s heartbeat, boosting morale, shaping a killer work culture, and leading everyone to win together.”
Promoting Optimism and Growth. Five participants highlighted the role of positive affect in fostering an environment where challenges are seen as opportunities for growth. One participant (P9) shared, “Positive affect helps build a conducive work environment where challenges are viewed as opportunities for growth.”
Continuous Improvement and Self-Evaluation. Four participants emphasized that leadership is an ongoing process that requires continuous improvement and self-evaluation. They discussed the importance of consistently caring for others, staying true to one’s values, and striving for improvement. One participant (P10) reflected, “Leadership is an art that needs to be refined constantly… It is about consistently caring for others, staying true to your values, and constantly striving for improvement.”
Sustaining as a Leader. Three participants noted the challenges of sustaining leadership over time. They acknowledged that while many embark on the leadership path, maintaining it is where the true challenge lies. “Leadership, in essence, is a path many embark on, but sustaining it—that is where the real challenge lies,” one participant (P9) observed.
Impact Beyond the Team. Four participants discussed the ripple effect of positive leadership, where a leader’s positive affect extends beyond the immediate team to influence the broader organization. One participant (P4) captured this idea: “In my view, ‘positive affect’ in leadership is all about creating an environment where everyone—my team, colleagues, clients—feels genuinely happy and supported… It is like spreading positivity creates this ripple effect that comes back in many beneficial ways.” In summary, these discussions highlight how positive affect in leadership can significantly influence various aspects of team dynamics, from creating supportive environments to fostering continuous improvement and extending positive influence beyond the immediate team.
Interview question 6. How do you think a leader’s ‘positive affect’ might influence their leadership style? Fourteen major themes arose in response IQ6: (a) team cohesion and connectedness (b) welcoming and open atmosphere (c) inclusivity and mutual respect (d) boosting teamwork and collaboration (e) encouraging creativity and Innovation (f) balancing enjoyment and productivity (g) facing challenges with positivity (h) resilience in adversity (i) empowering the team (j) motivating and inspiring others (k) balancing structure with support (l) humanizing leadership styles (m) spreading positivity throughout the team (n) influencing overall atmosphere.
Figure 4. Themes that emerged from IQ 6: How do you think a leader’s ‘positive affect’ might influence their leadership style?
Team Cohesion and Connectedness. Seven participants highlighted the importance of positive leadership in fostering team cohesion and connectedness. They emphasized that leaders who make everyone feel connected and valued create a work environment like a supportive family. One participant (P10) noted, “This kind of leader makes everyone feel connected and valued like we are all part of a big work family.”
Welcoming and Open Atmosphere. Six participants agreed that a welcoming and open atmosphere is crucial for a positive work environment. Leaders who are always ready to listen and engage with their teams contribute to making the workplace feel more inviting and inclusive. One participant (P7) shared, “They are always ready to listen and chat, making the workplace feel welcoming and open.”
Inclusivity and Mutual Respect. Five participants emphasized the role of inclusivity and mutual respect in leadership. Leaders who consistently radiate positivity uplift team morale and foster an environment where optimism and growth thrive. “Leaders who consistently radiate positivity not only uplift team morale but also foster an environment where optimism and growth thrive,” one participant (P9) remarked.
Boosting Teamwork and Collaboration. Six participants discussed how positive leadership boosts teamwork and collaboration. A supportive and positive leader encourages team members to collaborate and bring their best ideas. As one participant (P6) mentioned, “When the leader is positive and supportive, it encourages us to collaborate more and bring our best ideas to the table.”
Encouraging Creativity and Innovation. Seven participants highlighted that leaders who approach challenges with resilience and a solution-oriented mindset inspire team creativity and innovation. This approach sets a positive tone that encourages determination in adversity. One participant (P2) stated, “Their ability to approach challenges with resilience and a solution-oriented mindset sets the tone for their team, encouraging creativity and determination in the face of adversity.”
Balancing Enjoyment and Productivity. Four participants noted the importance of balancing enjoyment and productivity. Leaders who maintain a positive attitude ensure that while the team enjoys their work, they are also making progress and achieving their goals. “A happy leader keeps us all focused on our goals, too. They make sure that while we are enjoying our work, we are also making progress and hitting our targets,” one participant (P5) observed.
Facing Challenges with Positivity. Five participants emphasized that facing challenges positively is crucial for effective leadership. Leaders who tackle problems with a “we got this” attitude inspire creativity and resilience within their teams. As one participant (P3) said, “They tackle problems not just head-on but with a sort of ‘we got this’ attitude that is downright contagious, sparking creativity and grit even when the going gets tough.”
Resilience in Adversity. Six participants agreed that resilience is a key attribute of positive leadership. Leaders who demonstrate resilience in adversity set a strong example for their teams, encouraging them to adopt a solution-oriented mindset. “Their ability to approach challenges with resilience and a solution-oriented mindset sets the tone for their team,” noted one participant (P4).
Empowering the Team. Eight participants discussed how leaders who exude positive affect create a culture of empowerment and mutual respect. This culture drives engagement, innovation, and collective success within organizations. “Ultimately, leaders who exude positive affect create a culture of empowerment and mutual respect, driving engagement, innovation, and collective success within their organizations,” one participant (P5) shared.
Motivating and Inspiring Others. Seven participants highlighted the importance of motivating and inspiring others through positive leadership. A leader’s positive affect profoundly shapes their leadership style, instilling inspiration, resilience, and inclusivity. One participant (P6) reflected, “A leader’s positive affect profoundly shapes their leadership style, imbuing it with inspiration, resilience, and inclusivity.”
Balancing Structure with Support. Four participants noted that combining structure with support is essential for effective leadership. Leaders who blend the structured nature of transactional leadership with a positive approach led to a more engaged and motivated team. “I have found that combining the structured nature of transactional leadership with a positive and supportive approach leads to a more engaged and motivated team,” one participant (P10) remarked.
Humanizing Leadership Styles. Five participants discussed how positive affect humanizes leadership styles. They emphasized that this approach makes leadership more relatable and people-centered, particularly in transactional leadership. “A leader’s positive affect can profoundly shape their approach to leadership. In my case, it has made my transactional leadership style more human-centric,” shared one participant (P6).
Spreading Positivity Throughout the Team. Six participants highlighted the ripple effect of positive leadership, where positivity spreads throughout the team, creating a supportive and successful work environment. One participant (P2) noted, “It is like they spread their positivity around, making the workplace not just a place to work, but a place where we can all grow and succeed together.”
Influencing Overall Atmosphere. Six participants agreed that a leader’s positive affect significantly influences the overall atmosphere of the organization. A happy leader creates a positive environment that permeates the entire enterprise. “A happy leader illuminates happiness… A happy leader leads a happy enterprise,” stated one participant (P4). These discussions demonstrate how positive affect in leadership influences various aspects of team dynamics, from creating an inclusive environment to fostering resilience, empowerment, and a positive organizational atmosphere.
Interview question 7. In your opinion, how might transformational leadership contribute to or be influenced by positive affect? Eleven major themes arose in response IQ7: (a) mutual reinforcement (b) amplifying leadership effectiveness (c) inspiring commitment and dedication (d) creating a motivated and productive work environment (e ) encouraging creativity and innovation (f) transforming challenges into opportunities (g) enhancing trust and collaboration (h)trust as a foundation for leadership (I) positive affect as a catalyst for success (J) happiness leading to productivity (k) open-mindedness and adaptability.
Figure 5. Themes that emerged from IQ7: In your opinion, how might transformational leadership contribute to or be influenced by positive affect?
Mutual Reinforcement. Seven participants emphasized the strong connection between transformational leadership and positive affect. They explained that maintaining a positive effect is critical in enhancing transformational leadership, helping leaders drive engagement and motivation. One participant (P5) said, “Transformational leadership and positive affect are deeply interconnected… maintaining a positive affect as a leader plays a crucial role in this process.”
Amplifying Leadership Effectiveness. Six participants highlighted that positive affect amplifies the effectiveness of transformational leadership, enabling leaders to drive personal, group, and organizational growth. One participant (P2) noted, “The infusion of positive affect into transformational leadership amplifies its effectiveness in driving personal, group, and organizational growth.”
Inspiring Commitment and Dedication. Eight participants agreed that positive affect naturally fosters enthusiasm, optimism, and a sense of purpose within teams. Leaders who exhibit positivity are seen as closely aligned with the transformative principles of leadership. One participant (P8) stated, “Leaders who exude positive affect are naturally adept at fostering enthusiasm, optimism, and a sense of purpose within their teams.”
Creating a Motivated and Productive Work Environment. Seven participants discussed how happy leaders inspire their teams to work more effectively. A positive leader helps to create an environment where employees are motivated to succeed. One participant (P2) shared, “Happy employees are more motivated to see the company succeed since their ‘happiness’ is at stake.”
Encouraging Creativity and Innovation. Seven participants emphasized that a leader’s positive energy and passion inspire commitment and foster an environment conducive to creativity and collaboration. One participant (P4) expressed, “Their contagious energy and passion not only inspire commitment and dedication but also create an environment where creativity, innovation, and collaboration flourish.”
Transforming Challenges into Opportunities. Five participants noted that transformational leadership involves motivating teams to transform challenges into opportunities. Positive affect enables leaders to inspire their teams to adopt a growth mindset when facing difficulties. As one participant (P8) mentioned, “Transformational leadership is all about inspiring and motivating your team to achieve exceptional outcomes, not just by directing but by transforming their approach to challenges.”
Enhancing Trust and Collaboration. Six participants highlighted that positive affect enhances trust and collaboration within the team. A positive leader creates a culture of openness, improving communication and building solid relationships. One participant (P9) stated, “Their positive demeanor enhances communication and interpersonal relationships, promoting openness, trust, and collaboration within the team.”
Trust as a Foundation for Leadership. Seven participants emphasized that trust is the foundation of effective leadership, and positive affect is crucial in building trust with team members. Leaders who radiate positivity are better able to foster open communication and mutual respect. “Positive affect enables transformational leaders to build strong, trusting relationships with their followers,” one participant (P7) remarked.
Positive Affect as a Catalyst for Success. Six participants noted that positive affect is a driving force for organizational success. Leaders with a positive outlook inspire their teams to achieve ambitious goals and turn visions into realities. One participant (P6) observed, “A positive outlook can supercharge a transformational leader’s ability to inspire and motivate.”
Happiness Leading to Productivity. Five participants agreed that happy leaders drive productivity by fostering a positive work environment. They emphasized that a happy leader sets the stage for positive organizational outcomes. One participant (P2) shared, “When a leader is all about spreading happiness, it sets the stage for some great changes.”
Open-Mindedness and Adaptability. Four participants discussed the importance of open-mindedness and adaptability in leadership. Leaders with positive affect are more likely to embrace change and encourage their teams to do the same. One participant (P1) stated, “A happy, open-minded leader is open to change… However, a happy leader will initiate the change before it is too late.” These discussions reflect how positive affect enhances various aspects of transformational leadership, from fostering creativity and building trust to inspiring commitment and driving organizational success.
Interview question 8. Similarly, how do you see transactional leadership intersecting with positive affect? Eleven themes arose in response IQ8: (a) motivational interactions (b) softening the transactional nature (c) making transactions more human-centered (d) balanced atmosphere (e) supportive work environment (f) making transactions impactful (g) creating valued and motivated teams (h) temporary happiness (i) quick fix for morale (j) navigating tough situations (k) boosting team spirits
Figure 6. Themes that emerged from IQ 8: Similarly, how do you see transactional leadership intersecting with positive affect?
Motivational Interactions. Seven participants emphasized that integrating positive affect into transactional leadership ensures that interactions remain motivational rather than purely transactional. This approach helps leaders set clear goals and expectations while maintaining a supportive and encouraging atmosphere. One participant (P10) noted, “In my role, while I employ some aspects of transactional leadership by setting clear goals and expectations, integrating a positive effect ensures that these interactions remain motivational rather than purely transactional.”
Softening the Transactional Nature. Six participants discussed how positive affect can make the structured environment of transactional leadership more dynamic and engaging. By introducing positivity, leaders can encourage a more satisfied and engaged team. One participant (P7) shared, “Positive affect can make the structured environment of transactional leadership more dynamic, encouraging a more engaged and satisfied team.”
Making Transactions More Human-Centered. Five participants highlighted that positive affect could mitigate the mechanical feel of transactional interactions, making the workplace more human-centered and boosting morale. “A leader’s positive affect can mitigate the sometimes-mechanical feel of transactional interactions, making the workplace more human-centered and boosting morale,” one participant (P10) explained.
Balanced Atmosphere. Six participants agreed that combining transactional leadership with a cheerful demeanor creates a balanced atmosphere where team members understand expectations and feel motivated to meet them. One participant (P5) mentioned, “By combining transactional leadership elements with a positive demeanor, I aim to create a balanced atmosphere where team members know what is expected of them and feel encouraged to meet those expectations.”
Supportive Work Environment. Seven participants emphasized the importance of a supportive work environment. They noted that positive affect helps soften the transactional nature of leadership, making rewards feel more meaningful and corrective actions more constructive. “This approach helps soften the transactional nature of the exchanges, making rewards feel more meaningful and corrective actions more palatable,” one participant (P6) shared.
Making Transactions Impactful. Five participants discussed how positive affect can transform transactional interactions into meaningful exchanges. Leaders can communicate respect and appreciation by recognizing efforts with bonuses or personal gifts, making the transactions more impactful. One participant stated, “In a transactional framework, positive affect can transform mere transactions into meaningful exchanges.”
Creating Valued and Motivated Teams. Six participants emphasized that positive affect in transactional leadership creates a dynamic that makes everyone feel more valued and motivated. One participant (P6) noted, “It takes the whole give-and-take dynamic and wraps it in a vibe that makes everyone feel more valued and motivated.”
Temporary Happiness. Four participants acknowledged that transactional leadership could provide temporary happiness, especially when resolving conflicts or making deals. Although this satisfaction may be short-lived, it is often necessary for maintaining team morale. “Making deals creates temporary happiness. Nevertheless, it provides a temporary but necessary conflict resolution,” one participant (P8) remarked.
Quick Fix for Morale. Five participants discussed how effective transactional leadership can quickly boost team morale. Leaders skilled at making deals can bring happiness by smoothing over problems or securing wins for the team. “When a leader is good at making deals, it is like they bring a quick spark of happiness every time they smooth over a problem or snag a win for the team,” one participant (P2) shared.
Navigating Tough Situations. Six participants highlighted the importance of building trust and confidence through transactional leadership and positive affect. Leaders who navigate tricky situations effectively can reassure their teams and keep things moving. One participant (P4) stated, “It shows us that our leaders have skills and can navigate tricky situations to keep things moving.”
Boosting Team Spirits. Five participants discussed how the positive effect of transactional leadership can lift team spirits, even temporarily. The happiness generated from successful transactions or problem-solving can significantly impact team morale. “Even though it is just for a little while, this kind of happiness from making deals can be a big deal. It… can lift everyone’s spirits,” one participant (P8) observed. These discussions illustrate how integrating positive affect into transactional leadership can transform routine interactions into meaningful exchanges, foster a supportive environment, and provide significant boosts to team morale and confidence. Enhancing transactional leadership with positive affect can significantly improve the dynamics of leadership interactions. One participant (P2) mentioned, “In my role, while I do employ some aspects of transactional leadership by setting clear goals and expectations, integrating a positive effect ensures that these interactions remain motivational rather than purely transactional.” This approach allows leaders to soften the structured nature of transactional leadership, making the environment more dynamic and encouraging greater engagement and satisfaction among team members. Positive affect can make the structured environment of transactional leadership more dynamic, encouraging a more engaged and satisfied team (Judge & Piccolo, 2004).
Incorporating positive affect into transactional leadership also helps make transactions more human-centered. “A leader’s positive affect can mitigate the sometimes-mechanical feel of transactional interactions, making the workplace more human-centered and boosting morale,” a participant (P9) explained. By adding a personal touch, leaders can transform standard exchanges into interactions that foster a sense of respect and appreciation, thereby enhancing overall team morale (Bass & Riggio, 2006)
Interviewing question 9. And for Authentic leadership, how might it relate to or be influenced by positive affect? Ten themes arose in response IQ9: (a) honesty as a foundation for positive leadership (b) authenticity as a natural extension of positivity (c) trust as a result of authenticity (d) deeper connections through authentic and positive leadership ( e ) creating a trust-rich and empowering atmosphere (f) encouraging team members to be themselves (g) boosting team synergy and effectiveness (h) improving team dynamics (I) reinforcing genuine connections (J) amplifying the impact of authentic leadership.
Figure 7. Themes that emerged from IQ 9: And for Authentic leadership, how might it relate to or be influenced by positive affect?
Honesty as a Foundation for Positive Leadership. Seven participants emphasized that honesty is fundamental to authentic leadership. They believe that honesty is essential for cultivating a positive and effective leadership style, as it aligns with the values of transparency and integrity. One participant, P(10), stated, “Honesty is the foundation of all and any real leader. In my opinion, a real leader is a happy leader and a happy leader is an honest leader.”
Authenticity as a Natural Extension of Positivity. Six participants highlighted that authenticity is closely linked to positive affect. They noted that being genuine and transparent with the team naturally fosters positivity, creating an authentic and inspiring leadership style. One participant (P1) said, “Authentic leadership is inherently tied to being genuine and transparent with your team, and I see positive affect as a natural extension of this.”
Trust as a Result of Authenticity. Five participants discussed how authenticity in leadership fosters trust within the team. They noted that honest and transparent leaders build a strong foundation of trust, leading to genuine positive emotions and a cohesive team environment. One participant (P4) shared, “When a leader keeps it real and honest, that honesty is like the foundation for all the good vibes in the team.”
Deeper Connections Through Authentic and Positive Leadership. Six participants agreed that combining authenticity with positive affect helps deepen team connections. This approach strengthens relationships and improves the team’s ability to work together and overcome challenges. “In my experience, combining authentic leadership with a positive affect has facilitated deeper connections within the team,” noted one participant (P6).
Creating a Trust-Rich and Empowering Atmosphere. Seven participants emphasized creating an empowering atmosphere where trust is paramount. They observed that when authenticity is paired with positivity, it fosters an environment where team members feel supported and motivated to perform their best. One participant (P3) remarked, “Mixing authentic leadership with a splash of positivity is like hitting the jackpot in creating a trust-rich and empowering atmosphere.”
Encouraging Team Members to Be Themselves. Five participants highlighted that leaders who combine authenticity with positive affect create a culture where team members feel valued and free to be themselves. This environment encourages individual expression and contributes to overall team success. As one participant (P7) mentioned, “Leaders who embody authenticity while exuding positivity foster a culture where team members feel valued and encouraged to be their true selves.”
Boosting Team Synergy and Effectiveness. Six participants discussed how positive and authentic leadership boosts team synergy and effectiveness. They noted that the positive energy generated by this leadership style enhances teamwork and drives the team to perform better. One participant (P9) stated, “The happy feelings can boost management effectiveness through company synergy… It is like our happiness and trust turn into this superpower that strengthens the whole team and makes it more in sync.”
Improving Team Dynamics. Five participants agreed that the dynamic created by authentic and positive leadership improves overall team performance. They emphasized that this approach leads to better team cohesion, which drives better outcomes. “This dynamic enhances team cohesion and drives better overall performance,” one participant (P4) observed.
Reinforcing Genuine Connections. Six participants noted that positive affect catalyzes reinforcing genuine connections within the team. They believe this combination strengthens relationships and creates a more unified and motivated team. One participant (P8) shared, “Positive affect complements authentic leadership by reinforcing the genuine connections such leaders strive to build with their teams.”
Amplifying the Impact of Authentic Leadership. Five participants emphasized that authenticity, when combined with positive affect, amplifies the impact of leadership. They noted that this approach creates a sense of shared purpose and fosters a workplace where everyone is aligned with the organization’s values. “It is this cool interplay where being authentic amplifies the impact of their positivity, knitting together a sense of shared purpose,” one participant (P3) explained. Building trust and deep connections within a team directly results from authentic leadership combined with positive affect. (P3) observed, “When a leader keeps it real and honest, that honesty is like the foundation for all the good vibes in the team. It means that when we are feeling happy, it is genuine because we trust what is coming from the top.” This trust fosters deeper connections within the team; as another participant mentioned, “In my experience, combining authentic leadership with a positive affect has facilitated deeper connections within the team. It has also improved my ability to handle challenges collaboratively.” Fostering a supportive and empowering environment is another outcome of blending authentic leadership with positive affect. One participant (P9) shared, “Mixing authentic leadership with a splash of positivity is like hitting the jackpot in creating a trust-rich and empowering atmosphere.” Leaders who embody authenticity while exuding positivity create a culture where team members feel valued and encouraged to be their true selves. One participant (P7) noted, “Leaders who embody authenticity while exuding positivity foster a culture where team members feel valued and encouraged to be their true selves.”
Positive affect, when combined with authentic leadership, plays a significant role in enhancing team cohesion and overall performance. One participant (P3) described how ‘the happy feelings can boost management effectiveness through company synergy… It’s like our happiness and trust turn into this superpower that makes the whole team stronger and more in sync.” This dynamic not only enhances team cohesion but also drives better overall performance.
Positive affect acts as a powerful catalyst for authentic leadership. It reinforces the genuine connections that such leaders strive to build with their teams. As one participant (P4) observed, “Positive affect complements authentic leadership by reinforcing the genuine connections such leaders strive to build with their teams.” This communication between authenticity and positivity amplifies the impact of leadership, creating a workplace where everyone feels aligned with their values. Another participant (P5) emphasized this by stating, “It’s this cool communication where being authentic amplifies the impact of their positivity, knitting together a sense of shared purpose and a workplace where everyone’s in tune with their values.”
Interviewing question 10. From your experience, which of these leadership styles seems most effective when the leader exhibits strong positive affect? Why? Eleven themes arose in response IQ10: (a) alignment with positive affect (b) building trust and connection (c) enhancing credibility and inspiration (d) employee-centric approaches amplified by positivity (e ) supporting growth and empowerment (f) trust and empowerment in laissez-faire leadership (g) engaging and productive democratic leadership (h) boosting morale and creating a supportive environment (i) fostering team dynamics and performance (j) creating a happy work environment (k) positive energy spreading throughout the team.
Figure 8. Themes that emerged from IQ 10: From your experience, which of these leadership styles seems most effective when the leader exhibits strong positive affect? Why?
Alignment with Positive Affect. Seven participants highlighted that authentic leadership effectively harnesses the power of positive affect. They believe that authenticity, enthusiasm, optimism, and genuine concern for others create a leadership style that resonates deeply with team members. One participant (P1) noted, “Among the leadership styles, authentic leadership most effectively harnesses the power of strong positive affect.”
Building Trust and Connection. Six participants emphasized that authentic leaders who radiate positivity create a trust-filled environment. This open and genuine atmosphere fosters deep connections and drives team motivation. One participant (P6) mentioned, “When leaders show up as their authentic selves and radiate positivity, it creates this open, trust-filled space where everyone feels connected and genuinely driven.”
Enhancing Credibility and Inspiration. Five participants agreed that authenticity and positive affect enhance a leader’s credibility and make them truly inspirational. They noted that this “sweet spot” between authenticity and positivity significantly boosts a leader’s reputation. “This sweet spot, where authenticity meets positive emotion, does wonders for a leader’s rep,” observed one participant (P8).
Employee-Centric Approaches Amplified by Positivity. Seven participants highlighted that coaching, laissez-faire, and democratic leadership styles work well when combined with positive affect. These styles, which are inherently employee-centric, are enhanced when leaders prioritize happiness and positivity. One participant (P4) noted, “Three leadership styles work well with happy leaders. Coaching, Laissez-faire, and Democratic leadership are employee-centric styles.”
Supporting Growth and Empowerment. Six participants discussed how the positive effect of coaching leadership further enhances the leader’s ability to guide and develop their team. This approach fosters a work environment rich with growth and positivity. One participant (P8) stated, “With coaching leadership, a happy leader can be even more effective in guiding and developing their team.”
Trust and Empowerment in Laissez-faire Leadership. Five participants agreed that in a laissez-faire setup, a happy leader who trusts their team can significantly boost confidence and creativity. “In a laissez-faire setup, a happy leader trusts the team to do their thing, which can really boost confidence and creativity,” one participant (P9) remarked.
Engaging and Productive Democratic Leadership. Six participants emphasized that a positive leader in a democratic setup enhances discussion engagement and productivity. The leader’s enthusiasm for team input creates a more open and productive environment. “With democratic leadership, a happy leader’s enthusiasm for team input can make discussions more open and productive,” noted one participant (P1).
Boosting Morale and Creating a Supportive Environment. Seven participants emphasized that positive affect is crucial for boosting team morale and creating a supportive environment. This positivity fosters confidence, unity, and a sense of purpose within the team, keeping them focused and engaged. “By boosting morale and creating a supportive environment… harboring a positive affect created a sense of confidence, unity, and purpose,” one participant (P7) stated.
Fostering Team Dynamics and Performance. Five participants discussed how blending transactional and authentic leadership styles with positive affect balances precise expectations and supportive work culture. This combination has proven most effective in enhancing team dynamics and performance. “Blending transactional and authentic leadership, seasoned with a strong positive effect, has proven most effective in my experience,” shared one participant (P10).
Creating a Happy Work Environment. Four participants noted that happy leaders create an environment where happiness is both the foundation and the result of their leadership. They emphasized that a leader’s contentment with their skills and openness to change set the stage for a positive work culture. “From what I have seen, an honest leader works best because they are happy with their leadership skills and their leadership skills are open to change,” one participant (P6) explained.
Positive Energy Spreading Throughout the Team. Five participants discussed how a leader’s happiness creates a ripple effect throughout the organization. This positivity motivates employees and leads to happier clients and overall organizational success. “In all these styles, the leader’s happiness helps create a work atmosphere where employees feel valued and motivated,” one participant (P2) noted. In summary, these discussions illustrate how various leadership styles can significantly enhance team morale, trust, and overall effectiveness when infused with positive affect, leading to a more engaged and productive work environment.
Interviewing question 11. Can you share how the positive affect of a leader changed the dynamics or outcomes in your organization or team? Twelve themes arose from response IQ 11: (a) shift from stress to collaboration (b) turning setbacks into success (c) building a tight-knit team (d) creating a positive, supportive atmosphere (e) boosting job satisfaction and productivity (f) fostering a happy work environment (g) positive energy spreading throughout the team (h) collective success and mutual support (i) building stronger team bonds (j) creating a cohesive and motivated team (k) driving professional success and personal growth (l) inspiring confidence and unity.
Figure 3. Themes that emerged from IQ 11: Can you share positive affect of a leader changed the dynamics or outcomes in your organization or team?
Shift from Stress to Collaboration. Seven participants observed that maintaining a positive demeanor can shift the team dynamic from stress and frustration to collaboration and innovation. This positive leadership approach encourages creativity and engagement, transforming the overall atmosphere. One participant (P4) shared, “By maintaining a positive demeanor and continuously encouraging the team to think creatively and stay engaged, the overall atmosphere shifted from stress and frustration to collaboration and innovation.”
Turning Setbacks into Success. Six participants noted that positive leadership helps teams overcome immediate challenges and achieve outcomes that exceed expectations. This approach turns potential setbacks into significant successes. “The team was not only able to overcome the immediate hurdles but also delivered an exceptional outcome that exceeded our initial expectations,” mentioned one participant (P2).
Building a Tight-Knit Team. Seven participants highlighted how positivity fosters a tightly knit team where everyone feels hopeful and motivated. This sense of unity drives the team toward shared goals. “When everyone is feeling hopeful and motivated, it’s like we’re a tight-knit crew on a mission,” noted one participant (P2).
Creating a Positive, Supportive Atmosphere. Eight participants agreed that keeping the atmosphere upbeat and supportive significantly impacts team dynamics, making everyone feel confident and engaged. “Keeping things upbeat and supportive really changes the game with my team… it builds this awesome vibe where everyone’s buzzing, confident, and all in,” shared one participant (P6).
Boosting Job Satisfaction and Productivity. Seven participants emphasized that positive leadership leads to higher job satisfaction, increased productivity, and better employee retention. This approach ensures that employees feel valued and motivated to perform well. “This resulted in better job satisfaction, higher productivity, and longer employee retention,” noted one participant (P4).
Fostering a Happy Work Environment. Six participants highlighted that leaders who incorporate positive affect into their style create a fun and interactive work environment, further enhancing job satisfaction and overall team morale. “The department manager… incorporated the positive affect style of leadership where she encouraged office fun, banter, and lots of employee interaction,” one participant (P3) recalled.
Positive Energy Spreading Throughout the Team. Seven participants discussed how positive leadership affects not just the immediate team but also has a broader impact across the entire organization, spreading positivity and improving dynamics in various departments. “Integrating positive affect into the dynamics of my sales force has had a profound impact on the entire team,” said one participant (P7).
Collective Success and Mutual Support. Five participants agreed that the positive reinforcement cycle initiated by effective leadership fosters a culture of collective success and mutual support, benefiting the organization. “This cycle of positive reinforcement not only boosts morale across all levels of the organization but also fosters a culture of collective success and mutual support,” one participant (P5) shared.
Building Stronger Team Bonds. Six participants emphasized positive reinforcement helps transform a stressed team into a cohesive and motivated group, strengthening bonds and morale. “Experiencing firsthand how positive reinforcement transformed a stressed team into a cohesive, motivated group was a turning point,” remarked one participant (P8).
Creating a Cohesive and Motivated Team. Seven participants agreed that positive leadership is crucial in achieving project milestones and enhancing team cohesion and morale. “It highlighted the power of positive affect in leadership—not just in achieving project milestones but in strengthening team bonds and morale,” noted one participant (P9).
Driving Professional Success and Personal Growth. Six participants discussed how the exemplary leadership approach, infused with positive affect, can drive the team’s professional success and personal growth. This approach helps team members achieve their full potential. “It was a clear demonstration of how the right leadership approach can lead to both professional success and personal growth for the team,” one participant (P6) stated.
Inspiring Confidence and Unity. Five participants noted that facing challenges with a positive attitude inspires confidence and unity within the team, creating a motivated and cohesive work environment. “Facing those seasonal rollercoasters with a smile and a, ‘We have got this’ attitude… builds this awesome vibe where everyone is buzzing, confident, and all in,” shared one participant (P2). In summary, these discussions illustrate how positive leadership can transform challenges into opportunities, enhance team cohesion and morale, improve job satisfaction and retention, and create positivity throughout the organization, ultimately leading to team members’ collective success and personal growth.
Interviewing question 12. How do you think an organization’s culture can impact a leader’s tendency towards one of these leadership styles (authentic, transactional, and transformational)? Twelve themes arose from the response IQ 12: (a) culture shapes leadership tendencies (b) top-down influence (c) transformational leadership in innovative cultures (d) authentic leadership in transparent and ethical cultures (e) transactional leadership in result-oriented cultures (f) congruence between style and culture (g) challenges of a mismatch (h) adapting leadership style to cultural needs (i) balancing leadership styles (j) encouraging innovation and growth (k) promoting trust and intimacy (l) driving performance and efficiency.
Figure 10. Themes that emerged from IQ 12: How do you think an organization’s culture can impact a leader’s tendency towards one of these leadership styles (authentic, transactional, and transformational)?
Culture Shapes Leadership Tendencies. Eight participants emphasized that an organization’s culture is critical in shaping a leader’s inclination toward a particular leadership style. They highlighted how the prevailing culture significantly influences leadership behaviors. One participant (P5) stated, “I believe an organization’s culture plays a critical role in shaping a leader’s inclination toward a particular leadership style.”
Top-Down Influence. Seven participants noted that organizational culture often starts from the top and trickles down through the ranks, shaping the management style at all levels. “The culture of an organization starts from the top, emanating from the CEO,” observed one (P3) participant.
Transformational Leadership in Innovative. Six participants discussed how transformational leadership is often adopted in environments prioritizing creativity and forward-thinking. In such innovative cultures, leaders are motivated to inspire and drive change. One participant (P4) remarked, “In environments where creativity and forward-thinking are prioritized, leaders are often motivated to adopt transformational leadership approaches.”
Authentic Leadership in Transparent and Ethical Cultures. Seven participants emphasized that authentic leadership thrives in cultures that value honesty, ethical behavior, and transparency. In these environments, leaders are more likely to embody authenticity. “Leaders tend to embody authentic leadership in environments that value honesty, ethical behavior, and individual expression,” noted one participant(P8).
Transactional Leadership in Result-Oriented Cultures. Six participants agreed that transactional leadership is more prevalent in result-oriented cultures where efficiency, clear objectives, and performance rewards are prioritized. “Transactional leadership is more common in result-oriented settings,” explained one participant (P5).
Congruence Between Style and Culture. Eight participants highlighted that the effectiveness of a leadership style is deeply intertwined with the organizational culture. A strong alignment between a leader’s style and the organization’s values can significantly enhance leadership efficacy and overall performance. “The effectiveness of these leadership styles is deeply intertwined with the organizational culture,” one participant (P4) observed.
Challenges of a Mismatch. Five participants discussed the challenges that arise when there is a mismatch between leadership style and organizational culture. This misalignment can create obstacles for leaders trying to make an impact. “If things are out of sync, it can be a bit of a stumbling block,” noted one participant (P6).
Adapting Leadership Style to Cultural Needs. Six participants emphasized the importance of adapting leadership styles to meet the cultural needs of the organization. Leaders must be flexible, sometimes supportive and collaborative, and other times focusing on structure and discipline. One participant (P7) likened this adaptability to coaching, saying, “It is like being a coach… sometimes you’ve got to get down to the basics.”
Balancing Leadership Styles. Five participants discussed the need for leaders to balance different leadership styles depending on the organization’s cultural emphasis. This balance helps align with the company’s goals while maintaining a practical leadership approach. “I’ve found a natural fit in adopting a leadership style that is both transformational and authentic,” one participant (P10) stated.
Encouraging Innovation and Growth. Seven participants noted that transformational leadership flourishes in cultures, encouraging innovation and growth. In such environments, leaders are valued for their ability to inspire a collective vision and challenge the status quo. “Transformational leadership flourishes in innovative and growth-focused cultures,” observed one participant (P2).
Promoting Trust and Integrity. Six participants highlighted that authentic leadership is most effective in cultures emphasizing trust, integrity, and individual expression. These values create an environment where authenticity thrives. “Authentic leadership shines… in places all about being straight-up,” shared one participant (P8).
Driving Performance and Efficiency. Five participants agreed that transactional leadership is most effective in cultures focused on performance and efficiency, where clear goals and rewards are central to the organizational strategy. “Transactional leadership takes the lead… in spots where it is all about hitting targets,” noted one participant (P10).
Figure11. Themes that emerged when measuring Leadership Effectiveness
Five emerging themes arose when measuring leadership effectiveness. (a) emerging themes, (b) creating supportive environments, (c) emotional intelligence (d) inspiring positivity (e) fostering team cohesion (f) balancing leadership approaches
Emerging themes. As the interviews unfolded, several key themes emerged, providing deep insights into how leaders perceive and leverage positive affect to enhance their leadership effectiveness. These themes included creating supportive environments, emphasizing emotional intelligence, inspiring positivity, fostering team cohesion, and balancing leadership approaches. Each theme is discussed below, highlighting its significance in the context of leadership effectiveness.
Creating supportive environments. The most frequently mentioned theme was the importance of creating a supportive environment. Leaders emphasize that their productivity and well-being improve when team members feel valued, supported, and motivated. This supportive atmosphere encourages collaboration, creativity, and a collective drive toward success. Positive affect in leadership, therefore, plays a crucial role in establishing a work environment where individuals feel empowered to contribute their best.
Emotional intelligence. Emotional intelligence emerged as a significant theme, with leaders highlighting the importance of recognizing and managing their emotions and those of their team members. Leaders with high emotional intelligence are better equipped to navigate interpersonal relationships, build trust, and handle challenges empathetically. This emotional awareness fosters a leadership style that inspires confidence and resilience within the team.
Inspiring Positivity. Leaders who maintain a positive outlook, even in difficult circumstances, can uplift their teams and instill a sense of optimism and possibility. This theme was recurrent in the interviews, where participants described how their positivity motivated team members to see challenges as opportunities for growth. Inspiring positivity is vital to creating a culture of resilience and determination, which is essential for long-term success.
Fostering Team Cohesion. Positive affect in leadership was frequently associated with fostering team cohesion. Leaders noted that when they exhibit positivity, it helps to unite the team, creating a sense of shared purpose and collaboration. This cohesion is critical in achieving organizational goals, as it ensures that team members are aligned, motivated, and working together effectively.
Balancing Leadership Approaches. Another theme that emerged was the importance of balancing different leadership approaches. Leaders discussed the need to adjust their style depending on the situation and the individual team members. This adaptability ensures that while structure and clear expectations are maintained, there is room for support, recognition, and personal growth. Positive affect was key in striking this balance, making leadership more effective and dynamic.
The themes identified in this study offer a comprehensive understanding of how positive affect influences leadership effectiveness. Leaders can significantly enhance their effectiveness by creating supportive environments, leveraging emotional intelligence, inspiring positivity, fostering team cohesion, and balancing leadership approaches. These findings suggest that positive affect is not just a beneficial trait but a fundamental component of successful leadership. As organizations continue to evolve, integrating these insights into leadership development programs could lead to more resilient, motivated, and high-performing teams.
Summary
The chapter identifies critical themes from these interviews, such as creating supportive environments, fostering team cohesion, and leveraging emotional intelligence to inspire and motivate teams. Positive affect was consistently linked to enhanced leadership outcomes, including increased team morale, improved collaboration, and a greater capacity for innovation. Leaders who maintained a cheerful demeanor were seen as more effective in navigating challenges and driving their teams toward success, ultimately creating a more resilient and productive organizational culture.
The study underscores the critical role of positive affect in shaping leadership effectiveness across different styles, including transformational, transactional, and authentic leadership. It highlights how positive emotions can amplify traditional leadership qualities, such as vision and decision-making while fostering trust, inclusivity, and mutual respect within teams. The findings strongly suggest that organizational culture plays a significant role in facilitating or hindering the expression of positive affect by leaders, thereby emphasizing the crucial need for alignment between leadership styles and cultural values to maximize effectiveness. Overall, this study contributes valuable insights into the interplay between emotions and leadership, offering practical strategies for leaders to enhance their impact by integrating positive affect into their practices.
The findings of this study underscore the significant impact of positive affect on leadership effectiveness across various leadership styles, including transformational, transactional, and authentic leadership. Positive affect enhances leadership by fostering a supportive, cohesive, and innovative team environment. It strengthens trust and deepens team connections, driving personal and professional growth. Additionally, positive affect acts as a catalyst in transforming challenges into opportunities, ultimately leading to improved team performance and organizational success.
The study also highlights the influence of organizational culture on leadership style, emphasizing the importance of cultural alignment in maximizing leadership effectiveness. The dynamic nature of leadership requires adaptability, particularly in response to cultural needs, to maintain a balance between leadership styles and ensure a positive work environment. Chapter 5 will delve into the implications of these findings, exploring how leaders, through their own behavior and actions, can create and maintain a positive work environment. The chapter will detail the potential challenges and limitations encountered during the study, offering recommendations for future research and practical applications in various organizational settings. Finally, it will provide a reflective analysis of the study’s contributions to the existing body of knowledge on leadership and positive affect.
Table 2
Summary Table for the Interview Questions, organized by the Key Themes That Emerged from Each Question:
| Interview Question | Key Themes Identified |
| IQ1: Can you please provide a brief overview of your professional background and your current role? | Diverse professional backgrounds, extensive leadership experience, commitment to leadership roles, continuous learning. |
| IQ2: How many years of leadership experience do you have? | Extensive experience, continuous learning, adaptation and evolution in leadership styles. |
| IQ3: How would you define ‘positive affect’ in a leadership context? | Creating supportive environment, emotional intelligence, inspiring positivity. |
| IQ4: What leadership style (Transformational, Transactional, Authentic) do you primarily identify with? Can you share why? | Honesty & integrity, transparency & genuineness, building trust & inclusivity, inspiring & motivating others, vision & creativity, clear expectations & accountability, blending transactional with personal touch, adjusting to situation & person. |
| IQ5: Can you describe a time when you observed or experienced the impact of ‘positive affect’ in leadership? | Feeling valued & supported, team cohesion & collaboration, encouraging contributions, understanding & addressing needs, building trust & relationships, instilling confidence & enthusiasm, creating positive energy, motivating & energizing the team, promoting optimism & growth, continuous improvement & self-evaluation, sustaining as a leader, impact beyond the team. |
| IQ6: How do you think a leader’s ‘positive affect’ might influence their leadership style? | Team cohesion & connectedness, welcoming & open atmosphere, inclusivity & mutual respect, boosting teamwork & collaboration, encouraging creativity & innovation, balancing enjoyment & productivity, facing challenges with positivity, resilience in adversity, empowering the team, motivating & inspiring others, balancing structure with support, humanizing leadership styles, spreading positivity throughout the team, influencing overall atmosphere. |
| IQ7: In your opinion, how might transformational leadership contribute to or be influenced by positive affect? | Mutual reinforcement, amplifying leadership effectiveness, inspiring commitment & dedication, creating motivated & productive work environment, encouraging creativity & innovation, transforming challenges into opportunities, enhancing trust & collaboration, trust as a foundation for leadership, positive affect as a catalyst for success, happiness leading to productivity, open-mindedness & adaptability. |
| IQ8: Similarly, how do you see transactional leadership intersecting with positive affect? | Motivational interactions, softening transactional nature, making transactions more human-centered, balanced atmosphere, supportive work environment, making transactions impactful, creating valued & motivated teams, temporary happiness, quick fix for morale, navigating tough situations, boosting team spirits. |
| IQ9: And for Authentic leadership, how might it relate to or be influenced by positive affect? | Honesty as foundation for positive leadership, authenticity as natural extension of positivity, trust as result of authenticity, deeper connections through authentic & positive leadership, creating trust-rich & empowering atmosphere, encouraging team members to be themselves, boosting team synergy & effectiveness, improving team dynamics, reinforcing genuine connections, amplifying impact of authentic leadership. |
| IQ10: From your experience, which of these leadership styles seems most effective when the leader exhibits strong positive affect? Why? | Alignment with positive affect, building trust & connection, enhancing credibility & inspiration, employee-centric approaches amplified by positivity, supporting growth & empowerment, trust & empowerment in laissez-faire leadership, engaging & productive democratic leadership, boosting morale & creating supportive environment, fostering team dynamics & performance, creating happy work environment, positive energy spreading throughout the team. |
| IQ11: Can you share how the positive affect of a leader changed the dynamics or outcomes in your organization or team? | Shift from stress to collaboration, turning setbacks into success, building tight-knit team, creating positive & supportive atmosphere, boosting job satisfaction & productivity, fostering happy work environment, positive energy spreading throughout the team, collective success & mutual support, building stronger team bonds, creating cohesive & motivated team, driving professional success & personal growth, inspiring confidence & unity. |
| IQ12: How do you think an organization’s culture can impact a leader’s tendency towards one of these leadership styles (authentic, transactional, and transformational)? | Culture shapes leadership tendencies, top-down influence, transformational leadership in innovative cultures, authentic leadership in transparent & ethical cultures, transactional leadership in result-oriented cultures, congruence between style & culture, challenges of mismatch, adapting leadership style to cultural needs, balancing leadership styles, encouraging innovation & growth, promoting trust & integrity, driving performance & efficiency. |
Chapter 5: Discussion, Implications, and Conclusions
This study, unique in its approach, was grounded in the understanding that leadership extends beyond strategic decision-making and managerial skills but is deeply influenced by leaders’ emotional tone and affective states. Previous research has extensively highlighted the importance of positive affect—encompassing emotions such as joy, excitement, and contentment—as a critical factor that significantly impacts individual and organizational outcomes (Fredrickson, 2001; Isen & Baron, 1991).
This research employed a qualitative methodology to explore this concept further, specifically utilizing semi-structured interviews to gather in-depth insights from ten leaders across various industries. These leaders were chosen based on their extensive leadership experience and their demonstrated ability to lead with a positive outlook (Creswell & Poth, 2018). The aim was not only to understand the outcomes associated with positive affect in leadership but also to delve into the processes and interactions that contribute to effective leadership (Kahn, 1990). Through this approach, the study aimed to uncover how positive emotions shape leadership practices and, in turn, drive organizational success. By examining the lived experiences of these leaders, the research sought to provide a deeper understanding of how positive affect enhances leadership effectiveness and contributes to fostering a work environment that supports innovation, collaboration, and sustained performance.
In Chapter 4, the study’s primary findings were presented, highlighting several key themes that emerged from the interviews. These themes provided a detailed understanding of how positive affect is exhibited in leadership practices and its critical role in creating a work environment that fosters motivation, collaboration, and innovation (Fredrickson, 2001; Isen & Reeve, 2005). The findings, which underscore the importance of emotional intelligence in leadership, suggest that leaders who are attuned to their own emotions and those of their team members are better positioned to harness positive affect to achieve organizational goals (Goleman, 1995; Salovey & Mayer, 1990), are of significant value to the field of leadership and organizational studies.
This chapter focuses on interpreting these findings within the framework of established leadership theories and exploring their broader implications. We will begin by analyzing the relationship between positive affect and leadership effectiveness, drawing connections to well-established theories such as Fredrickson’s Broaden-and-Build Theory (Fredrickson, 2001) and transformational leadership models (Bass & Riggio, 2006). Following this, we will delve into the practical implications for leaders and organizations, offering concrete strategies for integrating positive affect into leadership practices. Additionally, this chapter will address the study’s limitations, acknowledging the constraints and challenges encountered during the research process. It will propose directions for future research further to explore the role of positive affect in leadership.
The importance of this study lies not only in its theoretical contributions but also in its practical implications for leaders and organizations. In today’s dynamic and complex business environment, the ability to lead positively and create a work culture that prioritizes emotional well-being is increasingly recognized as a critical determinant of success (Avolio & Gardner, 2005). By offering new insights into the impact of positive affect on leadership effectiveness, this study provides a valuable resource for leaders seeking to enhance their impact and for organizations aiming to foster a positive and productive work environment (George, 2000).
Interpretation of Findings
The findings of this study underscore the significant influence of positive affect on effective leadership. Leaders who intentionally incorporate positive emotions into their leadership style enhance their well-being and create a ripple effect that positively impacts their teams and organizations. This relationship between positive emotions and leadership effectiveness can be understood through Fredrickson’s Broaden-and-Build Theory (2001). According to this theory, positive emotions broaden an individual’s thought-action repertoire, developing enduring personal resources. In leadership, this theory suggests that leaders who foster a positive emotional state are more likely to inspire creativity, resilience, and collaboration among their team members, thereby enhancing the organization’s overall performance.
The study’s results also align with transformational leadership models, which emphasize the role of leaders in inspiring and motivating their followers to achieve higher levels of performance (Bass & Riggio, 2006). Transformational leaders naturally exhibit positive emotions through their enthusiasm, optimism, and visionary outlook. The leaders interviewed in this study illustrated how maintaining a positive emotional tone can be a powerful tool for guiding and motivating teams, especially during challenging or uncertain times. By sustaining a positive impact, these leaders were able to build trust and motivation, empowering their teams to face challenges with increased confidence and cohesion, thereby inspiring and motivating their followers.
Additionally, the study highlights the critical role of emotional intelligence in the effective use of positive emotions in leadership. Leaders with high emotional intelligence are more attuned to their own emotions and those of others, enabling them to strategically apply positive emotions to enhance their leadership effectiveness. This finding reinforces the theories proposed by Goleman (1995) and Salovey and Mayer (1990), who have consistently argued that emotional intelligence is a foundational component of effective leadership. The study highlighted how emotionally intelligent leaders were able to navigate complex interpersonal dynamics, cultivate positive work environments, and drive their teams toward higher levels of achievement, thereby empowering leaders to foster a positive work environment.
The alignment between the findings of this study and Fredrickson’s Broaden-and-Build Theory highlights the significant impact that positive emotions can have on leadership effectiveness. Fredrickson (2001) posits that positive emotions broaden an individual’s cognitive and behavioral repertoire, enabling them to perceive a more comprehensive array of possibilities and make more nuanced decisions. In leadership, this broadening effect equips leaders to approach challenges with a more open and innovative mindset, fostering a work environment rich in creativity and problem-solving capabilities. The leaders interviewed in this study consistently demonstrated how their optimistic outlooks enabled them to think more expansively, consider a broader range of solutions, and approach problems positively. This enhanced their decision-making processes and encouraged their teams to adopt a similar approach (Fredrickson, 2001).
Moreover, Fredrickson’s theory suggests that positive emotions contribute to developing enduring personal resources. This concept is reflected in how leaders in the study described the long-term benefits of maintaining a positive attitude. These leaders observed that their consistent display of optimism helped to build stronger relationships within their teams, fostered trust, and cultivated a resilient organizational culture (Fredrickson & Losada, 2005). This approach led to immediate successes and laid the foundation for sustained team performance and commitment, instilling a sense of hope and optimism in leaders and their teams.
When comparing these findings with the research of George (2000), which examined the role of mood in leadership, a significant overlap in conclusions is evident. George’s work highlighted that leaders who maintain a positive mood are likelier to foster a cooperative and supportive team environment, thereby improving decision-making and overall team performance. This study builds on that understanding by providing empirical evidence that leaders who exhibit positive affect enhance decision-making and deepen the relational bonds within their teams. Strengthening team cohesion and trust is particularly crucial in today’s complex organizational landscapes, where collaboration and adaptability are critical to success (George, 2000).
Furthermore, this study adds a new dimension to the existing literature by exploring how positive affect influences leadership beyond the cognitive and relational domains. The interviews revealed that leaders with positive affect also contribute to a more engaged and committed workforce. According to Fredrickson and Joiner (2002), team members working under such leaders reported higher levels of job satisfaction, motivation, and loyalty. These findings suggest that positive affect in leadership improves immediate work outcomes and enhances the overall employee experience, leading to lower turnover rates and higher long-term organizational commitment (Avolio & Gardner, 2005).
The depth of this study’s findings also highlights the interconnectedness between positive affect and other leadership qualities, such as emotional intelligence. Leaders who exhibited high levels of positive affect were also described as emotionally intelligent, with a keen awareness of their own emotions and those of their team members. This emotional intelligence allowed them to navigate complex interpersonal dynamics effectively, fostering an environment where team members felt understood and valued (Goleman, 1995). This, in turn, amplified the positive effects of their leadership, creating a virtuous cycle where positive affect and emotional intelligence reinforced each other (Goleman, 1995).
Finally, the relationship between positive affect and leadership effectiveness, as revealed by this study, is multifaceted and profoundly influential. Leaders who embody positivity enhance their decision-making and relational abilities and create a work environment that nurtures creativity, resilience, and long-term success (Fredrickson, 2001). By integrating these findings with established theories and research, this study contributes to a more comprehensive understanding of how positive affect operates as a critical lever in effective leadership (Bass & Riggio, 2006).
Positive affect in leadership enhances the workplace atmosphere and fundamentally transforms how teams’ function and interact (Isen & Baron, 1991). Participants in this study highlighted that leaders who consistently maintain a positive outlook set the tone for the entire team. A leader’s positive attitude can be contagious, encouraging team members to adopt a similar mindset (Fredrickson, 2001). This shift in perspective fosters an environment where challenges are seen not as insurmountable obstacles but as opportunities for learning and growth. Such a change in viewpoint can significantly impact how teams approach their work, leading to improved collaboration, innovation, and problem-solving capabilities (George, 2000).
One of the most notable outcomes of positive affect observed in this study was its ability to enhance team cohesion and collaboration. Fredrickson (2001) suggests that teams led by positive leaders tend to be more cohesive, with members working together more seamlessly and supporting one another in achieving shared goals. In today’s fast-paced and high-pressure work environments, the value of team unity cannot be overstated. The ability to work effectively as a team can be the difference between success and failure (Avolio & Gardner, 2005). Positive affect is critical in breaking down barriers between team members, fostering open communication, and encouraging a willingness to share ideas and provide feedback. This improves the quality of work and strengthens the team’s interpersonal bonds, leading to a more supportive and harmonious work environment (Goleman, 1995).
Additionally, the study’s findings indicate that positive affect plays a pivotal role in driving organizational outcomes by acting as a catalyst for adaptability and innovation. In environments characterized by rapid change, adapting quickly and thinking creatively is essential (Isen & Reeve, 2005). Leaders who approach challenges positively are more likely to inspire their teams to be flexible and open to new ideas (Fredrickson, 2001). This adaptability is closely linked to innovation, as teams that feel supported and encouraged by their leaders are more likely to take risks and explore novel solutions (George, 2000). In contrast, a hostile or fear-driven atmosphere can stifle creativity, leading to a more rigid, risk-averse approach to problem-solving (Avolio & Gardner, 2005).
The study also emphasizes the crucial role of positive affect in fostering a culture of trust and inclusivity (Goleman, 1995). Leaders who exhibit positivity create an environment where team members feel valued and respected, which is essential for building trust. When team members trust their leader and each other, they are more likely to express their ideas freely and take the kinds of risks necessary for innovation (Fredrickson, 2001). An inclusive atmosphere allows diverse perspectives to be heard, leading to more comprehensive and creative solutions to problems. Moreover, when team members feel safe expressing themselves, they are more engaged and committed to their work, which enhances overall organizational performance (Goleman, 1995).
The link between positive affect and trust also extends to how teams handle failure or setbacks. In a culture where positivity and trust prevail, failures are not seen as endpoints but opportunities for reflection and growth (Avolio & Gardner, 2005). Leaders who maintain a positive outlook during difficult times can help their teams recover more quickly from setbacks, learn from their mistakes, and move forward with renewed energy and focus (Fredrickson, 2001). This resilience is a critical factor in long-term success, enabling organizations to navigate the inevitable challenges of growth and change (Goleman, 1995).
In summary, positive affect plays a significant and multifaceted role in enhancing team cohesion and organizational outcomes (Fredrickson & Joiner, 2002). Leaders who embody positivity improve the immediate work environment and create the conditions for sustained success by fostering adaptability, innovation, trust, and inclusivity (Avolio & Gardner, 2005). The findings indicate the importance of cultivating positive affect as a core component of effective leadership and organizational culture (George, 2000).
Incorporating positive affect into leadership strategies has substantial and far-reaching practical implications (Fredrickson, 2001). Leaders who intentionally harness the power of positive emotions have the potential not only to transform their teams but also to influence the broader organizational culture (Goleman, 1995). The findings of this study suggest that by creating a work environment where employees feel genuinely valued and motivated, leaders can significantly enhance individual and collective performance (Avolio & Gardner, 2005). In today’s highly competitive business landscape, employee engagement and morale are critical factors in determining success (Fredrickson & Losada, 2005).
A particularly compelling example from the research involved a participant who described how maintaining a positive attitude during intense pressure transformed their team’s environment from one characterized by stress and anxiety to one marked by collaboration and creativity (Fredrickson, 2001). The leader’s optimistic outlook cascaded, inspiring team members to approach their work with renewed purpose and creativity (George, 2000). This shift in mindset alleviated immediate stress and led to tangible improvements in team morale and productivity (Avolio & Gardner, 2005). This case illustrates the profound impact that a leader’s emotional state can have on the overall atmosphere and effectiveness of the team (Goleman, 1995).
Leaders can effectively integrate positive affect into their leadership style by being mindful of their emotional expressions and interactions with team members (Fredrickson, 2001). One practical approach is to consistently recognize and celebrate employee achievements, no matter how small. Recognition can take many forms, from public acknowledgment in meetings to personalized notes of appreciation (Avolio & Gardner, 2005). These gestures reinforce each team member’s value, boosting their self-esteem and motivation (Goleman, 1995). Over time, such positive reinforcement helps build a culture where employees feel appreciated and are more likely to go above and beyond (Fredrickson & Joiner, 2002).
Another practical application of positive affect in leadership is providing support during challenging times. Leaders who maintain a positive and supportive attitude, even in the face of adversity, can help their teams navigate difficult situations more effectively (Fredrickson, 2001). This support might include empathetic listening, offering constructive feedback, or providing practical assistance to overcome obstacles (Goleman, 1995). By maintaining a calm and positive outlook, leaders can reassure their teams that challenges are temporary and can be overcome, thereby reducing anxiety and keeping the team focused on solutions (Avolio & Gardner, 2005).
Moreover, it is essential for leaders to consciously maintain an optimistic and forward-looking perspective in their daily interactions. This approach does not mean ignoring challenges or being unrealistically optimistic but consistently conveying a sense of possibility and potential (Fredrickson & Losada, 2005). Leaders who frame challenges as opportunities for growth and express confidence in their team’s ability to succeed create an environment where employees are more likely to embrace change and take initiative (George, 2000). This forward-looking perspective is critical in times of uncertainty or transition, as it helps sustain momentum and ensures that the team remains aligned with organizational goals (Avolio & Gardner, 2005).
Additionally, leaders can embed positive affect into the broader organizational culture by consistently modeling these behaviors and encouraging others to do the same (Fredrickson, 2001). This might involve integrating positive affect into leadership development programs, where emerging leaders are taught the importance of emotional intelligence and positivity in their leadership approach (Goleman, 1995). Leaders can also influence organizational policies and practices to ensure the workplace environment supports employee well-being and emotional health (Avolio & Gardner, 2005). For example, promoting work-life balance, providing opportunities for professional growth, and ensuring that the workplace is inclusive and supportive are all ways positive affect can be institutionalized within an organization (George, 2000).
In summary, fostering positive affect in leadership has numerous practical implications (Fredrickson, 2001). Leaders who consciously cultivate positivity can create a work environment where employees feel valued, motivated, and engaged (Avolio & Gardner, 2005). This, in turn, leads to improved team dynamics, higher productivity, and more tremendous success in achieving organizational goals (Goleman,1995). By incorporating these strategies into their daily interactions and broader organizational initiatives, leaders can harness the power of positive affect to drive long-term success and build a resilient, high-performing workforce (Fredrickson & Losada, 2005).
Theoretical Implications
Contributions to Leadership Theory
This study provides compelling empirical evidence highlighting the critical role that positive affect plays in enhancing leadership effectiveness, thus making a substantial contribution to the field of leadership theory (Fredrickson, 2001; George, 2000). Unlike earlier leadership theories, this study delves into the specific impact of positive emotions on leader behavior and outcomes, offering a more nuanced and detailed explanation of how positive affect shapes leadership (Avolio & Gardner, 2005). The findings suggest that positive affect does more than uplift a leader’s mood or create a more pleasant work environment; it fundamentally strengthens essential leadership skills such as vision, decision-making, and strategic thinking (Goleman, 1995). Leaders who consistently demonstrate positive affect are more effective in articulating a compelling vision for the future and making decisions that are inclusive, innovative, and aligned with long-term organizational goals (Bass & Riggio, 2006).
Moreover, the study highlights the critical role of positive emotions in building a solid foundation of trust and collaboration within teams (Fredrickson & Losada, 2005). George’s (2000) research demonstrates that leaders who maintain a positive emotional tone are more successful in establishing trust among their team members, emphasizing trust’s vital role in effective leadership. Trust, in turn, fosters open communication, facilitates the free exchange of ideas, and enhances teamwork—all crucial elements that contribute to the overall efficiency and cohesion of the team (Fredrickson, 2001). Teams characterized by high levels of trust and collaboration are better equipped to tackle complex challenges, innovate, and achieve their goals, thereby enhancing the overall effectiveness of leadership (Avolio & Gardner, 2005).
This study also introduces new insights into the phenomenological impact of emotion on leadership, highlighting the complex interchange between a leader’s emotional state and their ability to inspire and motivate others (Fredrickson, 2001). Goleman (1995) argues that leadership theory should not only focus on behavioral and cognitive aspects but also consider the emotional underpinnings of effective leadership. The study suggests that effective leadership involves not just the actions and strategies leaders employ but also their emotional states and the degree to which these emotions resonate with their followers (George, 2000). Leaders who possess emotional intelligence and maintain a positive demeanor are more adept at forming an emotional connection with their team, fostering greater loyalty, commitment, and enthusiasm (Fredrickson & Joiner, 2002). This emotional bond is crucial for driving engagement, cultivating a sense of purpose, and motivating teams to achieve higher performance levels (Bass & Riggio, 2006).
Furthermore, by exploring the phenomenological experiences of leaders, this study deepens our understanding of leadership as a dynamic and emotionally driven process (Fredrickson, 2001). The findings suggest that effective leadership is not static but is continuously shaped and reshaped by the emotional exchanges between leaders and their followers (Avolio & Gardner, 2005). This dynamic process operates as a continuous feedback loop, where a leader’s positive affect not only influences their behavior and decision-making but also elicits positive emotional responses from their team, reinforcing the leader’s effectiveness (Goleman, 1995). This perspective adds a new dimension to leadership theory, highlighting the importance of emotional intelligence and the role of positive affect in sustaining high levels of leadership effectiveness over time (Fredrickson & Losada, 2005).
In summary, this study offers significant empirical evidence that enhances our understanding of the role of positive affect in leadership (Fredrickson, 2001). It challenges traditional leadership theories by incorporating leadership’s emotional and affective dimensions, providing a more comprehensive and holistic understanding of what makes leadership effective (Avolio & Gardner, 2005). The findings indicate the importance of positive affect as a critical driver of leadership effectiveness, paving the way for future research to explore further the emotional aspects of leadership and their implications for theory and practice (Bass & Riggio, 2006).
Implications for Transformational and Authentic Leadership Models
The results of this study have significant implications for both transformational and authentic leadership models, indicating that positive affect is a crucial element that can significantly improve the success of these leadership techniques (Bass & Riggio, 2006; Avolio & Gardner, 2005). Transformational leaders, known for their capacity to inspire and motivate their teams to achieve higher levels of performance and personal growth, can enhance their influence by deliberately incorporating positive emotions into their leadership strategies (Bass & Riggio, 2006). This study proposes that pleasant emotions greatly enhance the impact of key aspects of transformational leadership, including inspiring motivation, setting a positive example, stimulating intellectual growth, and showing personalized care for individuals (Bass & Riggio, 2006). According to Fredrickson (2001), when transformational leaders display positive emotions, they are likelier to establish an atmosphere of excitement and hope, which can spread to team members. The presence of a favorable emotional milieu encourages increased involvement and dedication among team members as they become more motivated and invigorated to accomplish challenging objectives (Avolio & Gardner, 2005). In addition, a leader’s capacity to foster creativity and invention is augmented by positive affect. This is because positive affect establishes a psychologically secure atmosphere in which team members are encouraged to take chances and venture into uncharted territory, knowing they have their leader’s backing (Fredrickson, 2001). The study’s results suggest that incorporating happy emotions promotes individual development among team members and enhances the business’s overall growth. This is because teams become more flexible, resilient, and proficient in achieving long-term success (George, 2000).
Moreover, the research emphasizes the crucial significance of pleasant emotions in authentic leadership, which involves leading with openness, integrity, and a sincere regard for the welfare of others (Avolio & Gardner, 2005). The study highlights how good effect can strengthen the essential attributes of authentic leaders, such as their ability to establish solid and trustworthy relationships with their team members (Fredrickson, 2001). Authentic leaders who consistently maintain a happy emotional state have a more remarkable ability to communicate honestly and effectively. This creates an environment where trust and mutual respect flourish (Goleman, 1995). The establishment of trust is crucial for genuine leadership, as it allows leaders to form profound connections with their team members, fostering strong relationships that improve team unity and cooperation (George, 2000).
Positive affect is essential for increasing a leader’s authenticity by making their displays of care, concern, and empathy more sincere and influential (Fredrickson, 2001). According to Avolio and Gardner (2005), team members are more inclined to react positively when leaders communicate with transparency and honesty, along with a positive and supporting attitude. The combination of genuineness and positive affect creates a work culture where people feel appreciated, esteemed, and inspired to perform at their highest level (Fredrickson & Losada, 2005). According to the study, in such a setting, team members are more likely to show increased engagement, contentment, and loyalty, which are crucial for long-term organizational success (George, 2000).
Furthermore, incorporating pleasant emotions into authentic leadership techniques empowers leaders to effectively handle obstacles and disagreements (Avolio & Gardner, 2005). Leaders who tackle challenging problems with an optimistic and productive perspective will likely find solutions that uphold trust and sustain relationships (Fredrickson, 2001). This strategy minimizes the possible adverse effects of conflicts and converts obstacles into chances for advancement and progress, benefiting both the leader and the team (George, 2000).
To summarize, the study’s results emphasize that pleasant emotions are crucial in improving the success of both transformational and genuine leadership models (Bass & Riggio, 2006). By integrating positive emotions into their leadership strategies, transformational leaders can motivate more creativity and facilitate long-term expansion. In contrast, authentic leaders can enhance confidence and foster stronger team bonds (Fredrickson, 2001). The observations above emphasize the significance of emotional intelligence and the intentional development of pleasant emotions as crucial elements of successful leadership in contemporary and intricate organizational settings (Avolio & Gardner, 2005).
Practical Implications
Strategies for Leaders
Leaders aiming to enhance their performance and cultivate a more positive work environment can implement various strategies to promote positive emotions among their team members. A critical component of this approach is the development and application of emotional intelligence, which involves recognizing and regulating one’s own emotions and understanding and influencing the emotions of others. Leaders with high emotional intelligence are better equipped to navigate the intricate emotional dynamics within their organizations. This skill set allows them to respond to challenges with composure and optimism, which is particularly important during times of crisis or high stress. Maintaining emotional stability fosters trust and resilience among team members, ensuring they remain focused and motivated, even when faced with significant obstacles.
To foster positive emotions, leaders can start by engaging in regular self-reflection to deepen their awareness of emotional triggers and patterns. This heightened self-awareness allows leaders to intentionally choose their responses to various situations, opting for actions that promote optimism rather than those that may escalate conflict or negativity. Leaders can also demonstrate empathy by practicing active listening, acknowledging the emotions of their team members, and offering support when needed. This compassionate approach strengthens the emotional bond between leaders and their teams. It nurtures a culture of trust and mutual respect, which are fundamental to sustaining positive emotions in the workplace.
Leaders can further cultivate a positive mindset by incorporating mindfulness practices, stress management techniques, and positive self-talk into their daily routines, alongside developing self-awareness and empathy. Mindfulness, for example, helps leaders stay grounded in the present moment, reducing the likelihood of being overwhelmed by stress or negative emotions. By practicing mindfulness, leaders can achieve a state of calm and mental clarity, which enables them to approach challenges with a constructive and solution-oriented mindset. Similarly, stress management strategies such as deep breathing exercises, regular physical activity, and effective time management can help leaders maintain emotional balance, sustaining a positive and focused mindset throughout the workday.
To effectively integrate positive emotions into their leadership strategies, leaders can intentionally create a work environment that is both supportive and collaborative. This can be achieved by fostering a culture of transparent communication, where team members feel safe expressing their thoughts, ideas, and concerns without fear of criticism or retaliation. Leaders can establish this culture by being honest and transparent in their interactions, sharing relevant information with their teams, and actively seeking feedback on their decisions and actions. By modeling openness and encouraging dialogue, leaders can cultivate an atmosphere of psychological safety, essential for nurturing positive emotions and fostering collaboration among team members. This sense of security enhances team cohesion and drives creativity and innovation, as employees are more likely to contribute their best ideas and efforts when they feel valued and respected.
Leadership training programs are crucial in equipping leaders with the tools and skills to cultivate positive emotions within their teams. By integrating the findings of this study, such programs can emphasize the importance of maintaining a positive mindset, effectively managing stress, and creating a work environment that supports emotional well-being. Training modules on emotional intelligence can be precious, offering leaders insights into recognizing and managing their own emotions while also understanding and influencing the emotions of others.
Moreover, these programs can incorporate practical exercises and real-life scenarios that allow leaders to practice constructive communication strategies, resolve conflicts, and implement team-building activities to foster a healthy emotional climate. By engaging in these hands-on experiences, leaders can develop the ability to navigate complex interpersonal dynamics, promote a culture of empathy and respect, and ultimately create a more cohesive and motivated team. These skills not only enhance leadership effectiveness but also contribute to the overall success and sustainability of the organization.
Leadership development initiatives can also strongly emphasize teaching leaders the skills needed to recognize and leverage the strengths of their team members, promoting a constructive and strengths-based approach to management. By acknowledging and celebrating the unique contributions of each team member, leaders can significantly boost morale and foster a culture of appreciation and positivity. This strengths-focused approach enhances individual and team performance and contributes to a more engaged and motivated workforce.
Leaders can effectively nurture positive emotions within their teams by prioritizing emotional intelligence, practicing mindfulness and stress management, encouraging open and transparent communication, and participating in targeted leadership training. These strategies enhance leadership effectiveness and help create a supportive, collaborative, and resilient work environment where employees feel valued and inspired to perform at their best. By integrating these practices, leaders can drive individual and organizational success, ensuring their teams are well-equipped to thrive in today’s dynamic and often challenging work environments.
Organizational Policy and Culture
Organizations play a vital role in shaping an emotional climate that enhances employee well-being and drives productivity and overall organizational success. One practical approach to cultivating such an atmosphere is developing and implementing comprehensive policies designed to foster and maintain positive emotions within the workplace. These policies can take various forms, but they all share the goal of creating an environment where positive emotions are encouraged, valued, and integrated into the organization’s daily operations. Recognition programs, a powerful strategy for organizations, celebrate the achievements and contributions of employees. These programs not only reinforce positive behaviors but also boost morale. When employees feel their hard work and accomplishments are recognized and appreciated, they experience positive emotions such as pride, satisfaction, and motivation. These positive feelings can have a ripple effect throughout the organization, leading to increased employee engagement, lower turnover rates, and higher levels of job satisfaction.
Recognition programs can be structured in various ways, ranging from formal initiatives, such as employee of the month awards, to more informal gestures, like spontaneous acknowledgments or shout-outs during meetings. Regardless of the format, recognition must be consistent, genuine, and inclusive, ensuring all employees feel valued and appreciated. By embedding recognition into the organizational culture, companies can create a work environment that supports positive emotions and drives sustained success and employee loyalty.
Creating a positive emotional atmosphere in the workplace involves more than just implementing recognition programs; it requires offering comprehensive mental health support as well. Emotional well-being is closely linked to mental health, and organizations that prioritize mental health are more likely to foster a happy and supportive work environment. This support can include providing access to counseling services, offering stress management resources, and establishing wellness programs that address physical and mental well-being. Organizations can help employees manage stress, prevent burnout, and maintain a positive mindset by taking proactive steps to address mental health. Additionally, promoting open discussions about mental health and reducing the stigma associated with seeking help can cultivate an atmosphere of transparency and support, making employees feel more comfortable in addressing their emotional well-being.
Team building and social interaction opportunities are also crucial for creating a positive emotional environment. Whether through structured workshops or informal social events, team-building activities help strengthen employee relationships, build trust, and foster a sense of camaraderie. Strong social connections within the workplace positively correlate with emotions like happiness, belonging, and enthusiasm. These positive emotions, in turn, enhance teamwork, creativity, and problem-solving abilities, leading to better organizational outcomes. Therefore, organizations should invest in regular team-building activities and create spaces where employees can interact and build relationships in a relaxed and informal setting. This might include organizing company retreats, team lunches, or after-work social events that encourage personal connections among employees.
Organizational culture plays a critical role in determining whether leaders and employees can effectively express positive emotions. A culture that values and promotes positivity enables leaders to consistently and authentically display positive emotions, setting the tone for the entire organization. In such a culture, optimism is embraced as a shared value, and leaders are more likely to be supported in their efforts to create a positive work environment. This cultural support is vital as it empowers leaders to model positive behaviors, which can then be emulated by employees, creating a virtuous cycle of positive experiences and emotions throughout the organization.
An organizational culture that neglects the importance of positive emotions or permits negativity to thrive can stifle the expression of positive emotions. In such environments, the absence of positive emotions can lead to increased stress, lower morale, and decreased productivity. Therefore, it is crucial for organizations to consciously shape their culture to encourage positive emotions by embedding this focus into their core values, policies, and practices. This intentional effort can significantly impact the emotional climate of the workplace.
Cultivating a culture that values and promotes positive emotions requires intentional and sustained effort. Organizations can start by explicitly articulating the importance of positive affect in their mission statements and value propositions. Leaders at all levels should embody empathy, optimism, and emotional intelligence, demonstrating a commitment to positivity. These leaders should receive training and support to develop these qualities. Additionally, organizations should regularly assess their workplace culture, gathering feedback from employees about the emotional climate of the organization and adjusting as needed to foster a more positive and supportive environment.
In summary, organizations can enhance employee well-being and productivity by implementing policies that prioritize recognition, mental health support, and team development. Cultivating an organizational culture that empowers leaders to demonstrate optimism consistently and encourages collaborative interactions among team members is equally important. By maintaining this positive environment, organizations can create a more engaged, motivated, and resilient workforce in the face of challenges, thereby driving sustained success for the organization.
Limitations of the Study
While this study provides valuable insights into the correlation between positive affect and leadership effectiveness, several limitations should be acknowledged. While the qualitative methodology, based on semi-structured interviews with ten leaders, provided rich, detailed data, it also introduced limitations. The small sample size and the specific criteria for selecting participants—leaders with demonstrated positive attitudes—may not fully represent the broader population of leaders. Therefore, future research with a more extensive and diverse sample is crucial to validate and expand these findings.
Another potential limitation is the study’s exclusive focus on leaders who already exhibit positive affect in their leadership styles. This focus may introduce a selection bias, as it overlooks the experiences of leaders who do not naturally display optimism but still lead effectively. Therefore, future research should adopt a more inclusive approach to understand how leaders who struggle with or do not prioritize positive emotions might develop or integrate these practices into their leadership approaches.
Moreover, the study primarily captured the perspectives of the leaders themselves without including the views of their followers or team members. This reliance on a single perspective may have constrained the study’s ability to fully understand the impact of positive emotions on team dynamics and organizational outcomes. Incorporating the experiences and observations of team members could provide a more comprehensive view of how positive affect influences leadership effectiveness.
The study’s cross-sectional design, which gathered data from leaders at a single point, may also not fully account for the dynamic and evolving nature of leadership and emotional states. Leadership effectiveness and the influence of positive affect may vary over time, depending on organizational changes, external pressures, or personal development. Longitudinal studies could offer deeper insights into how positive emotions in leadership evolve and impact organizational outcomes over time.
These limitations suggest the need for caution when interpreting the study’s results and highlight the importance of further research to explore the broader applicability and long-term effects of positive affect in leadership.
Recommendations for Future Research
Further research has the potential to significantly advance our understanding of the role of positive affect in leadership by exploring its influence in various contexts and circumstances. One promising area for future study is the examination of positive emotions in situations characterized by high levels of stress or crisis. Leadership during crises presents unique challenges, as leaders must make critical decisions under pressure, manage uncertainty, and maintain team morale in the face of potentially overwhelming conditions. Investigating the strategies employed by leaders who sustain a positive emotional state in high-stress environments could provide valuable insights into the resilience of positive leadership and its capacity to adapt to challenges. Research might explore whether leaders who exhibit positive affect are more effective in preserving team cohesion, reducing fear, and fostering a solution-oriented mindset during crises than those who do not prioritize positivity.
Moreover, future research should place a greater emphasis on understanding the role of negative emotions in leadership, an area that was only briefly touched upon in this study. While positive affect has been shown to enhance leadership effectiveness, negative emotions such as stress, frustration, and anger are also intrinsic to the leadership experience. If not managed effectively, these emotions can have detrimental effects on both the leader and the team. However, negative emotions can also serve as catalysts for change, driving leaders to confront underlying issues, make tough decisions, and spur progress. Future studies could explore how leaders manage and mitigate the impact of negative emotions, examining strategies that enable them to harness these emotions for positive outcomes while minimizing their negative effects. Emphasizing this aspect would provide a more balanced understanding of the emotional landscape of leadership and offer practical guidance for leaders on navigating the full spectrum of emotions inherent in their roles.
Further exploration is also needed to understand how cultural differences shape the expression of positive emotions and their impact on leadership. Cultural norms, values, and expectations play a significant role in how leadership styles and emotional expressions vary across different cultures. Understanding how positive emotions are perceived and how they influence leadership in diverse cultural settings could provide valuable insights for global organizations and leaders working in multicultural environments. For example, research could investigate whether the benefits of positive emotions observed in Western cultures, which often emphasize individualism and assertiveness, are similarly applicable in collectivist cultures that prioritize group harmony and indirect communication. Additionally, this research could examine how leaders in different cultural contexts adapt their use of positive emotions to align with cultural expectations and how this adaptation influences their effectiveness. Stressing the importance of this aspect would make your audience feel that your research is relevant and applicable to their work.
In an increasingly globalized world, understanding the cultural nuances of positive emotions in leadership is essential for developing effective leadership strategies across different regions. For instance, approaches that enhance leadership effectiveness through positive emotions in one cultural context may yield different results in another. By investigating these cultural differences, researchers can help leaders tailor their approaches to elicit positive outcomes in a culturally appropriate and contextually relevant way, thereby enhancing leadership effectiveness in global and multicultural settings.
Additionally, future research could explore the long-term effects of positive emotions on leadership. While this study provides an initial glimpse into the impact of positive emotions on leadership effectiveness, a more in-depth examination could reveal the enduring effects of sustained positive affect on leadership outcomes. Research could investigate whether the benefits of positive affect accumulate over time, leading to increasingly favorable outcomes, or whether there are potential downsides to consistently maintaining a positive effect, such as burnout or the neglect of crucial critical feedback. Understanding the long-term consequences of positive emotions would offer a more comprehensive view of their impact on leadership and inform strategies for sustaining effective leadership practices throughout a leader’s career.
In summary, future research can build upon the findings of this study by exploring how positive emotions influence leadership in various contexts, examining the role of negative emotions, and investigating how cultural differences shape the expression and impact of positive emotions. These areas of inquiry will deepen our theoretical understanding of leadership and provide practical insights that can be applied to enhance leadership practices in diverse and challenging environments. By expanding the scope of research on positive emotions and leadership, scholars and practitioners alike can contribute to developing more effective, adaptable, and culturally sensitive leadership strategies.
Conclusion
This study underscores the critical importance of positive affect in enhancing leadership effectiveness, demonstrating how a leader’s ability to foster and maintain positivity can significantly impact team dynamics, create a supportive work environment, and drive organizational success. Leaders who consciously integrate positive emotions into their leadership practices not only elevate their own effectiveness but also empower their teams to perform at their best. This positivity creates a ripple effect within the organization, leading to increased employee engagement, improved collaboration, and a stronger capacity to overcome challenges and achieve collective goals. The resilience fostered by a positive work environment is particularly beneficial in today’s fast-paced and often unpredictable business landscape, where the ability to adapt and thrive under pressure is essential.
Moreover, the findings of this study highlight the pivotal role of organizational culture in shaping and reinforcing leadership behaviors. A culture that values and supports positive emotions not only enables leaders to express positivity freely but also encourages employees at all levels to engage in positive, supportive interactions. This cultural support is crucial for sustaining the benefits of positive emotions in leadership over time. Organizations that recognize the importance of positive affect and actively cultivate a culture that promotes it are more likely to develop effective leaders and achieve long-term success. The alignment between organizational culture and leadership practices is key to creating a work environment where positivity is not a sporadic occurrence but a foundational element of daily operations.
The insights from this study contribute significantly to our understanding of the emotional dimensions of leadership and their impact on organizational outcomes, thereby advancing the field of leadership studies. This research extends existing leadership theories by emphasizing the importance of positive emotions and offering new perspectives on how emotions influence leadership effectiveness. It challenges traditional views of leadership that may overlook the importance of emotional intelligence and affective states, suggesting instead that the emotional tone set by leaders is a critical determinant of their success.
The future of research on positive affect and leadership is promising. As businesses become increasingly complex and diverse, there is a growing need for leaders who can effectively manage and harness emotions. Further exploration of the relationship between emotions and leadership could uncover new strategies for enhancing leadership effectiveness, developing emotionally intelligent leaders, and creating organizational environments that are both productive and fulfilling for all stakeholders.
Future research could build on this study by exploring the specific effects of different types of positive emotions, such as enthusiasm, gratitude, or compassion, on various aspects of leadership. Additionally, examining the role of positive affect in different organizational contexts, such as remote or hybrid work environments, could provide valuable insights into how leaders can maintain positivity and foster connection in an ever-evolving workplace. Longitudinal studies that track the long-term effects of positive emotions on leadership and organizational outcomes would also contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of how sustained positivity leads to enduring success.
Finally, this study lays a foundation for future research into the emotional aspects of leadership, highlighting the significant impact of positive emotions on leadership effectiveness. As scholars continue to explore this dynamic field, they will uncover new ways to help leaders cultivate positive affect, ultimately leading to more resilient, innovative, and successful organizations. Ongoing research will yield valuable insights that inform both academic scholarship and practical leadership development, ensuring that future leaders are equipped to lead with optimism, empathy, and emotional intelligence.
Reference
Arnold, J. A., Arad, S., Rhoades, J. A., & Drasgow, F. (2000). The empowering leadership questionnaire: The construction and validation of a new scale for measuring leader behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(3), 249–269.
Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M. (1991). The full range leadership development: Basic and advanced manuals.
Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M. (2004). Multifactor leadership questionnaire manual (3rd ed.). Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden.
Avolio, B. J., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 315–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.001
Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Walumbwa, F. O., Luthans, F., & May, D. R. (2004). Unlocking the mask: How authentic leaders impact follower attitudes and behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly,15(6), 801–823.
Avolio, B. J., Walumbwa, F. O., & Weber, T. J. (2009). Leadership: Current theories, research, and future directions. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 421-449. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163621
Avolio, B. J., & Yammarino, F. J. (2002). Transformational and charismatic leadership: The road ahead. Emerald Group Publishing.
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The Job Demands-Resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309-328.
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2014). Job demands-resources theory. In C. Cooper & P. Chen (Eds.), Wellbeing: A complete reference guide (pp. 1-28). John Wiley & Sons.
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands-resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273-285.
Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 499-512.
Barsade, S. G. (2002). The ripple effect: Emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(4), 644-675. https://doi.org/10.2307/3094912
Barsade, S. G., & Gibson, D. E. (2007). Why does affect matter in organizations? Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(1), 36-59.
Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Free Press.
Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1990a). Transformational leadership development: Manual for the multifactor leadership questionnaire. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1990b). Developing transformational leadership: 1992 and beyond. Journal of European Industrial Training.
Bass, B. M., & Bass, R. (2008). The Bass Handbook of Leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications (4th ed.). Free Press.
Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership (2nd ed.). Psychology Press.
Bennis, W., & Nanus, B. (2007). Leaders: Strategies for taking charge. HarperCollins.
Bennis, W., & Thomas, R. (2002). Geeks and geezers: How era, values, and defining moments shape leaders. Harvard Business Review Press.
Bono, J. E., & Ilies, R. (2006). Charisma, positive emotions, and mood contagion. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(4), 317–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.04.008
Bono, J. E., & Judge, T. A. (2003). Self-Concordance at work: Toward understanding the motivational effects of transformational leaders. Academy of Management Journal, 46(5), 554–571.
Brown, A., & Green, T. (2018). Work-life balance and leadership effectiveness: An empirical study.Journal of Business Studies Quarterly, 9(3), 85–99.
Cameron, K. (2008). Positive leadership: Strategies for extraordinary performance. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Cameron, K. S., & Dutton, J. E. (2003). Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Cameron, K. S., & Spreitzer, G. M. (2012). The Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship. Oxford University Press.
Carson, J. B., Tesluk, P. E., & Marrone, J. A. (2007). Shared leadership in teams: An investigation of antecedent conditions and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 1217–1234.
Carmeli, A. (2003). The relationship between emotional intelligence and work attitudes, behavior, and outcomes: An examination among senior managers. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 18(8), 788–813.
Carmeli, A., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Ziv, E. (2010). Inclusive leadership and employee involvement in creative tasks in the workplace: The mediating role of psychological safety. Creativity Research Journal, 22(3), 250-260.
Chen, Y., Zhang, J., Wang, Y., & Lan, G. (2014). The impact of leaders’ positive affect on followers’ ethical behavior: The moderating role of ethical leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 123(3), 385-392.
Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1998). Charismatic leadership in organizations. Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper & Row.
Dasborough, M. T., Ashkanasy, N. M., Tee, E. Y. J., & Tse, H. H. M. (2009). What goes around comes around: How Meso-level negative emotional contagion can ultimately determine organizational attitudes toward leaders. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(4), 571–585.
David, S. (2016). Emotional agility: Get unstuck, embrace change, and thrive in work and life. Avery.
Davis, L., & Miller, S. (2021). Professional development as a pathway to organizational growth: A longitudinal study. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 42(2), 233-248.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer US.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.
Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 499-512.
Diener, E. (1984). Subjective wellbeing. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542–575. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.542
Diener, E., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction With Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71-75.
Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective wellbeing: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276-302. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276
Downton, J. V. (1973). Rebel leadership: Commitment and charisma in the revolutionary process. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Dutton, J. E., Frost, P. J., Worline, M. C., Lilius, J. M., & Kanov, J. M. (2003). Leading in times of trauma. Harvard Business Review, 81(1), 54-61.
Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383.
Emmons, R. A., & McCullough, M. E. (2003). Counting blessings versus burdens: An experimental investigation of gratitude and subjective wellbeing in daily life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(2), 377–389.
Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). What good are positive emotions? Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 300-319.
Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218-226. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218
Fredrickson, B. L. (2003). The value of positive emotions: The emerging science of positive psychology is coming to understand why it is good to feel good. American Scientist, 91(4), 330-335.
Fredrickson, B. L., & Branigan, C. (2005). Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought-action repertoires. Cognition and Emotion, 19(3), 313–332.
Fredrickson, B. L., & Losada, M. F. (2005). Positive affect and the complex dynamics of human flourishing. American Psychologist, 60(7), 678-686. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.7.678
Fredrickson, B. L., Tugade, M. M., Waugh, C. E., & Larkin, G. R. (2003). What good are positive emotions in crises? A prospective study of resilience and emotions following the terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11th, 2001. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(2), 365–376. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.2.365
Gardner, W. L., Fischer, D., & Hunt, J. G. (2009). Emotional labor and leadership: A threat to authenticity? The Leadership Quarterly, 20(3), 466–482.
Gardner, W. L., Collier, C. C., Davis, K. M., & Dickens, M. P. (2011). Authentic leadership: A review of the literature and research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(6), 1120–1145.
George, B. (2003). Authentic leadership: Rediscovering the secrets to creating lasting value. Jossey-Bass.
George, J. M. (2000). Emotions and leadership: The role of emotional intelligence. Human Relations, 53(8), 1027–1055.
George, J. M. (2007). Creativity in organizations. Academy of Management Annals, 1(1), 439-477.
George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2007). Dual tuning in a supportive context: Joint contributions of positive mood, negative mood, and supervisory behaviors to employee creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 605–622.
Giorgi, A. (1985). Sketch of a psychological phenomenological method. In A. Giorgi (Ed.), Phenomenology and psychological research (pp. 8–22). Duquesne University Press.
Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. Bantam Books.
Goleman, D. (1998). Working with emotional intelligence. Bantam Books.
Goleman, D., Boyatzis, R., & McKee, A. (2002). Primal leadership: Realizing the power of emotional intelligence. Harvard Business School Press.
Goleman, D. (2017). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Goleman, D. (2017). Leadership that gets results. Harvard Business Review Press.
Grant, A. M. (2008). The significance of task significance: Job performance effects, relational mechanisms, and boundary conditions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1), 108–124.
Grant, A. M., & Berry, J. W. (2011). The necessity of others is the mother of invention: Intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective-taking, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 54(1), 73–96. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.59215085
Grant, A. M., & Sumanth, J. J. (2020). The impact of positive affect on leadership.
Parker, U. K. Bindl, & J. L. Wu (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of positive organizational scholarship (pp. 542-553). Oxford University Press.
Grant, A. M., & Schwartz, B. (2011). Too much of a good thing: The challenge and opportunity of the inverted U. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 61-76.
Greenleaf, R. K. (1970). The servant as leader. Robert K. Greenleaf Center.
Grinnell, R. M., & Unrau, Y. A. (2017). Social work research and evaluation: Foundations of evidence-based practice (10th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Groysberg, B., & Slind, M. (2012). Leadership is a conversation. Harvard Business Review, 90(6), 76-84.
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59-82.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K.
Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). Sage Publications.
Hakanen, J. J., Schaufeli, W. B., & Ahola, K. (2008). The Job Demands-Resources model: A three-year cross-lagged study of burnout, depression, commitment, and work engagement. Work & Stress, 22(3), 224-241.
Hannah, S. T., Avolio, B. J., & Walumbwa, F. O. (2011). Relationships between authentic leadership, moral courage, and ethical and prosocial behaviors. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(4), 555-578. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq201121439
Harper, S., & Jones, M. (2017). Linking positive leadership practices to organizational performance. Journal of Business and Psychology, 32(3), 357–374.
Hartnell, C. A., Ou, A. Y., & Kinicki, A. (2011). Organizational culture and effectiveness: A meta-analytic investigation of the competing values framework’s theoretical suppositions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(4), 677–694.
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021987
Hater, J. J., & Bass, B. M. (1988). Superiors’ evaluations and subordinates’ perceptions of transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(4), 695-702.
Haidt, J. (2006). The happiness hypothesis: Finding modern truth in ancient wisdom. Basic Books.
House, R. J., et al. (1994). Strategic leadership: A multiorganizational-level perspective. Quorum Books.
House, R. J., & Aditya, R. N. (1997). The social scientific study of leadership: Quo Vadis? Journal of Management, 23(3), 409-473.
House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Sage Publications.
Howell, J. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1993). Transformational leadership, transactional leadership, locus of control, and support for innovation: Key predictors of consolidated-business-unit performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(6), 891–902.
Ilies, R., Morgeson, F. P., & Nahrgang, J. D. (2005). Authentic leadership and eudaemonic wellbeing: Understanding leader-follower outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 373-394.
Isen, A. M., Daubman, K. A., & Nowicki, G. P. (1987). Positive affect facilitates creative problem-solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1122-1131.
Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., Sully de Luque, M., & House, R. J. (2006). In the eye of the beholder: Cross cultural lessons in leadership from Project GLOBE. Academy of Management Perspectives, 20(1), 67-90.
James, W. (1884). What is an emotion? Mind, 9(34), 188–205.
James, W. (1902). The varieties of religious experience. Longmans, Green.
Johnson, L. M. (2019). Exploring leadership behaviors and their impact on employee job satisfaction in the healthcare industry. Journal of Applied Psychology, 124(2), 225–240. doi:10.1037/apl0000423
Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. B. (2017). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
Judge, T. A., & Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 755-768.
Judge, T. A., Piccolo, R. F., & Ilies, R. (2009). The forgotten ones? The validity of consideration and initiating structure in leadership research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(6), 1165–1184. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017193
Jung, D. I., & Sosik, J. J. (2017). The relationship between positive affect and professional leadership. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 24(4), 475-484. doi:10.1177/1548051816686644
Kahneman, D., Diener, E., & Schwarz, N. (Eds.). (1999). Wellbeing: The foundations of hedonic psychology. Russell Sage Foundation.
Kanter, R. M. (1983). The change masters: Corporate entrepreneurs at work. Simon and Schuster.
Kark, R., & Shamir, B. (2002). The dual effect of transformational leadership: Priming relational and collective identities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(6), 1055-1062. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1055
Kellett, J. B., Humphrey, R. H., & Sleeth, R. G. (2006). Empathy and the emergence of task and relations leaders. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(2), 146–162.
Kernis, M. H. (2003). Toward a conceptualization of optimal self-esteem. Psychological Inquiry, 14(1), 1-26.
Keyes, C. L. M. (2002). The mental health continuum: From languishing to flourishing in life. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 43(2), 207–222.
Keyes, C. L. M., Shmotkin, D., & Ryff, C. D. (2002). Optimizing wellbeing: The empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 1007–1022.
Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2012). The leadership challenge: How to make extraordinary things happen in organizations (5th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2017). The leadership challenge: How to make extraordinary things happen in organizations. Wiley.
Kringelbach, M. L., & Berridge, K. C. (2017). The affective core of emotion: Linking pleasure, subjective wellbeing, and optimal metastability in the brain. Emotion Review, 9(3), 191-199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073916669661
Lencioni, P. (2002). The five dysfunctions of a team: A leadership fable. Jossey-Bass.
Lewin, K., Lippitt, R., & White, R. K. (1939). Patterns of aggressive behavior in experimentally created social climates. Journal of Social Psychology, pp. 10, 271–299.
Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Zhao, H., & Henderson, D. (2008). Servant leadership: Development of a multidimensional measure and multilevel assessment. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(2), 161–177.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
Liu, C., Zheng, J., Liu, X., Wang, Y., & Wang, L. (2021). Emotional labor and employee creativity: The role of positive affect and emotional intelligence. Current Psychology, 40(4), 1893-1903.
Liu, Y., Wang, M., Chang, C. H., & Shi, J. (2019). Work-family balance and the wellbeing of Chinese hotel employees: The effects of affective commitment and seniority. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 80, 22-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2019.01.009
Luthans, F. (2002). The need for and meaning of positive organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(6), 695–706.
Luthans, F., & Avolio, B. J. (2003). Authentic leadership: A positive developmental approach. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship (pp. 241-261). Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Luthans, F., & Avolio, B. J. (2009). The “point” of positive organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(2), 291-307.
Luthans, F., Avolio, B. J., Avey, J. B., & Norman, S. M. (2007). Positive psychological capital: Measurement and relationship with performance and satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 60(3), 541–572.
Lyubomirsky, S. (2007). The how of happiness: A new approach to getting the life you want. Penguin Books.
Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., & Diener, E. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin, 131(6), 803-855. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.803
Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and personality. Harper & Row.
Maslow, A. H. (1968). Toward a psychology of being. Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Masten, A. S. (2001). Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development. American Psychologist, 56(3), 227-238.
Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Sage Publications.
Mayer, J. D., Caruso, D. R., & Salovey, P. (1999). Emotional intelligence meets traditional standards for intelligence. Intelligence, 27(4), 267–298.
Mayer, J. D., & Salovey, P. (1997). What is emotional intelligence? In P. Salovey & D. J.
Sluyter (Eds.), Emotional development and emotional intelligence: Implications for educators (pp. 3-31). Basic Books.
Mayer, J. D., Roberts, R. D., & Barsade, S. G. (2008). Human abilities: Emotional intelligence. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 507-536.
McKinsey & Company. (2020). Diversity wins: How inclusion matters. Retrieved [2020].
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage Publications.
Morse, J. M. (2015). Critical analysis of strategies for determining rigor in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Health Research, 25(9), 1212–1222.
Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Sage Publications.
Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). The concept of Flow. In Flow and the foundations of positive psychology (pp. 239-263). Springer Netherlands.
Northouse, P. G. (2016). Leadership: Theory and practice (7th ed.). Sage Publications.
Nussbaum, M. C. (2006). Frontiers of justice: Disability, nationality, species membership. Harvard University Press.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Sage Publications.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage Publications.
Parker, S. K., & Collins, C. G. (2010). Taking stock: Integrating and differentiating multiple proactive behaviors. Journal of Management, 36(3), 633–662.
Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Xin, K. R. (1999). Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 1-28.
Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. Oxford University Press.
Peterson, S. J., Luthans, F., Avolio, B. J., Walumbwa, F. O., & Zhang, Z. (2011).
Psychological capital and employee performance: A latent growth modeling
approach. Personnel Psychology, 64(2), 427–450. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01215.x
Peterson, S. J., & Luthans, F. (2003). The positive impact and development of hopeful leaders. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 24(1/2), 26-31.
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Harper & Row.
Pink, D. H. (2009). Drive: The surprising truth about what motivates us. Riverhead Books.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors affect followers’ trust in the leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 1(2), 107–142.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Bommer, W. H. (1996). Transformational leader behaviors and substitutes for leadership as determinants of employee satisfaction, commitment, trust, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Management, 22(2), 259-298.
PWC. (2018). PWC Health Research Institute’s 2018 workforce trends study. Retrieved from https://www.pwc.com/us/en/industries/health-industries/library/workforce-trends-study.html
Robbins, S. P., & Coulter, M. (2016). Management (13th ed.). Pearson.
Rogers C. R. (1951). Client-centered therapy: Its current practice, implications, and theory. Houghton Mifflin.
Rogers, C. R. (1961). On becoming a person: A therapist’s view of psychotherapy. Houghton Mifflin.
Rudestam, K. E., & Newton, R. R. (2014). Surviving your dissertation: A comprehensive guide to content and process(4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Russell, R. F., & Stone, A. G. (2002). A review of servant leadership attributes: Developing a practical model. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 23(3), 145–157.
Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological wellbeing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069–1081.
Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. (2008). Know thyself and become what you are: A eudaimonic approach to psychological wellbeing. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(1), 13-39.
Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 9(3), 185-211.
Sapienza, A. M., & Popp, E. (2018). Communication competencies for effective leadership: Perceptions of IT leaders. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 32(3), 313-345.
Schaubroeck, J., Lam, S. S. K., & Cha, S. E. (2007). Embracing transformational leadership: Team values and the impact of leader behavior on team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 1020-1030. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1020
Schaubroeck, J., Lam, S. S. K., & Peng, A. C. (2011). Cognition-based and affect-based trust as mediators of leader behavior influences team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(4), 863-871. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023561
Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment. Free Press.
Seligman, M. E. P. (2006). You learned optimism: How to change your mind and life—vintage Books.
Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and wellbeing. Free Press.
Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5–14.
Sendjaya, S., & Sarros, J. C. (2002). Servant leadership: Its origin, development, and application in organizations. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 9(2), 57-64.
Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Doubleday.
Shi, J., Wang, Z., Huang, L., Deng, X., & Wang, L. (2019). The neural mechanisms underlying leaders’ positive affect and ethical leadership. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 13, 26.
Sinek, S. (2014). Leaders eat last: Why some teams pull together, and others do not. Portfolio/Penguin.
Smith, J. A. (2008). Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Smith, J. A. (Ed.). (2015). Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (3rd ed.). Sage.
Smith, J. A., & Osborn, M. (2008). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In J.A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 53–80). Sage.
Smith, P. L. (2019). Sampling in quantitative research. The SAGE handbook of quantitative methods in psychology (pp. 67–83). Sage Publications.
Snyder, C. R., & Lopez, S. J. (2009). Oxford handbook of positive psychology. Oxford University Press.
Stogdill, R. M. (1948). Personal factors associated with leadership: A survey of the literature. Journal of Psychology, 25, 35-71.
Stogdill, R. M. (1974). Handbook of leadership: A survey of theory and research. Free Press.
Sutcliffe, K. M., & Vogus, T. J. (2003). Organizing for resilience. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline (pp. 94–110). Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Sy, T., Côté, S., & Saavedra, R. (2005). The contagious leader: Impact of the leader’s mood on the mood of group members, group affective tone, and group processes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(2), 295-305.
Thomas, J., Harden, A., & Oakley, A. (2004). Integrating qualitative research with trials in systematic reviews. BMJ, 328(7446), 1010-1012.
Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19(6), 349–357.
Tuckey, M. R., Bakker, A. B., & Dollard, M. F. (2008). Empowering leaders optimize working conditions for engagement: A multilevel study. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 13(2), 184-196.
Tugade, M. M., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2004). Resilient individuals use positive emotions to bounce back from negative emotional experiences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(2), 320-333.
Turner, P., & Muller, R. (2018). Exploring the relationship between leader positivity and talent retention in high-performance environments. Leadership Quarterly, 29(4), 530–543.
Van Manen, M. (2014). Phenomenology of practice: Meaning-giving methods in phenomenological research and writing. Routledge.
Vlastos, G. (1991). Socrates: Ironist and moral philosopher. Cornell University Press.
Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Wernsing, T. S., & Peterson, S. J. (2008). Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure. Journal of Management, 34(1), 89–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307308913
Walumbwa, F. O., Hartnell, C. A., & Oke, A. (2010). Servant leadership, procedural justice climate, service climate, employee attitudes, and organizational citizenship behavior: A cross-level investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(3), 517–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018867
Waldman, D. A., & Bass, B. M. (1991). Transformational leadership at different phases of the innovation process. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 2(2), 129-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/1047-8310(91)90004-A
Waldman, D. A., Bass, B. M., & Yammarino, F. J. (2004). Adding to the emotional intelligence construct: A multilevel approach. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(3), 409-421.
Warr, P. (1999). Wellbeing and the workplace. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Wellbeing: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 392–412). Russell Sage Foundation.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief positive and negative affect measures: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063-1070.
Wolcott, H. F. (1994). Transforming qualitative data: Description, analysis, and interpretation. Sage Publications.
Yukl, G. (1989). Managerial leadership: A review of theory and research. Journal of Management, 15(2), 251–289.
Yukl, G. (2006). Leadership in organizations (6th ed.). Prentice Hall.
Yukl, G. (2010). Leadership in organizations (7th ed.). Prentice Hall.
Yukl, G. (2012). Leadership in organizations. Pearson.
Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in organizations (8th ed.). Pearson.
Zhang, X., & Bartol, K. M. (2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 107-128.
Zhang, Y., Waldman, D. A., Han, Y. L., & Li, X. (2015). Paradoxical leader behaviors in people management: Antecedents and consequences. Academy of Management Journal, 58(2), 538-566. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.1168
APPENDIX A
IRB Approval Notice
ensure accuracy, and all audio files will be password-protected, transcribed, and subsequently destroyed.
POTENTIAL RISKS AND DISCOMFORTS
The potential and foreseeable risks associated with participation in this study include a possible breach of confidentiality or interview fatigue. The principal investigator will minimize the risk of breach of confidentiality by securing all files on a password-protected personal computer. The investigator will minimize the risk of interview fatigue by ensuring that the interview process does not extend the duration of one hour.
POTENTIAL BENEFITS TO PARTICIPANTS AND/OR TO SOCIETY
The potential benefits of this study extend to both the individual participants and society at large. For participants, engaging in this research offers an opportunity for introspection and self-awareness, allowing leaders to reflect on their emotional states and their influence on leadership effectiveness. This introspective process can lead to personal growth, enhanced emotional intelligence, and improved leadership strategies. At a broader level, the findings have the potential to significantly benefit society by informing organizational practices and leadership development programs that emphasize positive emotional climates. Such insights could lead to healthier work environments, increased job satisfaction, and overall enhanced organizational performance. By highlighting the value of positive affect in leadership, this study could inspire a shift towards more empathetic, resilient, and effective leadership practices across various sectors, contributing to the well-being and success of organizations and their employees.
CONFIDENTIALITY
The records collected for this study will be confidential as far as permitted by law. However, if required to do so by law, it may be necessary to disclose information collected about you. Examples of the types of issues that would require me to break confidentiality are if disclosed any instances of child abuse and elder abuse. Pepperdine’s University’s Human Subjects Protection Program (HSPP) may also access the data collected. The HSPP occasionally reviews and monitors research studies to protect the rights and welfare of research subjects.
The data will be stored on a password protected computer in the principal investigator’s place of residence. The data will be coded and de-identified. The data will be stored for a minimum of three years and subsequently be destroyed.
Any and all identifiable information collected in reference to this study is, and will remain, confidential. Your name, address, institution’s name, or other identifiable information will not be included as part of this study. Your responses will be coded with a pseudonym and transcript data will be maintained separately. The audio recordings will be destroyed once they have been transcribed. You have the right to review and edit the transcripts.
PARTICIPATION AND WITHDRAWAL
Your participation is voluntary. Your refusal to participate will involve no penalty or loss of benefits to which you are otherwise entitled. You may withdraw your consent at any time and discontinue participation without penalty. You are not waiving any legal claims, rights or remedies because of your participation in this research study.
ALTERNATIVES TO FULL PARTICIPATION
The alternative to participation in the study is not participating or only completing the items for which you feel comfortable. Your professional relationship with your employer will not be affected, whether you participate or not in this research study.
EMERGENCY CARE AND COMPENSATION FOR INJURY
If you are injured as a direct result of research procedures you will receive medical treatment; however, you or your insurance will be responsible for the cost. Pepperdine University does not provide any monetary compensation for injury.
INVESTIGATOR’S CONTACT INFORMATION
You understand that the investigator is willing to answer any inquiries you may have concerned the research herein described. You understand that you may contact Christan Nguyen (Christan.Nguyen@pepperdine.edu) or Dr. Eric Hamilton (Eric.Hamilton@pepperdine.edu) if you have any other questions or concerns about this research.
RIGHTS OF RESEARCH PARTICIPANT – IRB CONTACT INFORMATION
If you have questions, concerns or complaints about your rights as a research participant or research in general please contact Dr. Judy Ho, Chairperson of the Graduate & Professional Schools Institutional Review Board at Pepperdine University 6100 Center Drive Suite 500 Los Angeles, CA 90045, 310-568-5753 or gpsirb@pepperdine.edu.
SIGNATURE OF RESEARCH PARTICIPANT
I have read the information provided above. I have been given a chance to ask questions. My questions have been answered to my satisfaction and I agree to participate in this study. I have been given a copy of this form.
AUDIO
□ I agree to be audio-recorded
□ I do not want to be audio-recorded
Name of Participant
Signature of Participant Date
SIGNATURE OF INVESTIGATOR
I have explained the research to the participants and answered all of his/her questions. In my judgment, the participants are knowingly, willingly and intelligently agreeing to participate in this study. They have the legal capacity to give informed consent to participate in this research study and all of the various components. They also have been informed participation is voluntarily and that they may discontinue their participation in the study at any time, for any reason.
Name of Person Obtaining Consent
Signature of Person Obtaining Consent
Date
APPENDIX C
Recruitment Script
Dear [name],
My name is Christan Nguyen, and I am a doctoral student in the Education and Psychology at Pepperdine University. I am conducting a qualitative phenomenological research study to investigate the relationship between positive affect and leadership effectiveness. For this study, I am seeking volunteer participants from various industries to ensure a diverse population. Participation involves engaging in a semi-structured interview that will explore your experiences, perceptions, behaviors, and the role of positive affect in leadership within your organization.
Your participation in the study will be audio-recorded to ensure accurate capture of information and is anticipated to take no more than 60 minutes.
Participation in this study is voluntary, and your identity as a participant will be protected before, during, and after the time that study data is collected. Strict confidentiality procedures will be in place to mitigate any risk of a breach of confidentiality. These include using pseudonyms, secure storage of data, and restricting access to the research team only.
If you have any questions or would like to participate in this study, please feel free to contact me at your earliest convenience at [christan.nguyen@pepperdine.edu or (714) 728-0565.
Thank you for considering this opportunity to contribute to important research on leadership effectiveness.
Evan John