Write a brief description of the Pros and Cons to approaching the project using the ‘Predictive’ SDLC, then the Pros and Cons to approaching the project as ‘Adaptive’ SDLC. Then recommend either Predictive or Adaptive to the SDLC for the project and briefly describe why.

TASK
back to top
Further Background

Refer to background information provided in Assessments 1 and 2 regarding COVID-safeguard project. Please refer to the marking guide when preparing your response to see what criteria and standards will be used to assess your work.
Assessment Item 3 Tasks
This assignment has two (2) tasks as described below:
Task 1: SDLC Approach
Write a brief description of the Pros and Cons to approaching the project using the ‘Predictive’ SDLC, then the Pros and Cons to approaching the project as ‘Adaptive’ SDLC. Then recommend either Predictive or Adaptive to the SDLC for the project and briefly describe why.

Task 2: Agile Principles
Research on the Internet about software development projects using Agile principles and complete the following tasks for your COVID-safeguard project.

  • How will you train the team to use Agile development?
  • How will you adopt this approach in the organization?
  • Which aspects do you find frustrating or difficult to use?

RATIONALE
back to top
This assessment task will assess the following learning outcome/s:

  • be able to evaluate development requirements and prepare a feasibility proposal based on multi-disciplinary (financial, human resource, technological) analyses.
  • be able to formulate and justify system requirement models based on evaluation of given situations.
  • be able to assemble the components of a requirements model using the tools and techniques of object oriented or structured systems modelling.

MARKING CRITERIA AND STANDARDS
back to top

CRITERIA STANDARDS
High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Fail
Task 1: SDLC Approach

6 marks

Demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding in relation to SDLC approach. Has insights and awareness of deeper more subtle aspects of the topic content. Evidence of having researched/read more widely beyond the core materials. (5.10-6.00) Demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding in relation to SDLC approach. Has insights and awareness of deeper more subtle aspects of the topic. Evidence of having read beyond the core materials. (4.50-5.09) Demonstrates clear understanding in relation to SDLC approach. Demonstrates thorough understanding of material presented in core texts and readings.
(3.90-4.49)
Discusses the SDLC approach. Demonstrates evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. However literature is presented uncritically in a purely descriptive manner. Content acknowledged but not really taken into account. (3.00-3.89) Poor discussion of SDLC approach. Demonstrates very little evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. Inaccurate or inconsistent acknowledgment of sources. Limited knowledge of key principles and concepts.
(0.00-2.99)
Task 2: Agile Principles

6 Marks

All required tasks for Agile principles are identified and described. As well as demonstrate in-depth understanding of the software development using Agile principles.
(5.10-6.00)
Most of the required tasks for Agile principles are identified and described. As well as demonstrate good understanding of the software development using Agile principles.
(4.50-5.09)
Some of the required tasks for Agile principles are identified and described. As well as demonstrate some understanding of the software development using Agile principles.
(3.90-4.49)
Only few required tasks for Agile principles are identified and described. As well as demonstrate little understanding of the software development using Agile principles. (3.00-3.89) Agile principles are poorly expressed and no explanation about software development life cycle using Agile principles.
(0.00-2.99)
Presentation and clarity (accuracy, spelling, grammar, punctuation, figures)
2 Marks
Fluent writing style appropriate to the assignment with accurate grammar and spelling, and high-quality figures drawn using some tools and figures have some captions.(1.70-2.00) Mostly fluent writing style appropriate to assignment with accurate grammar and spelling, and good-quality figures drawn using some tools and figures have some captions.
(1.50-1.69)
Mostly fluent writing style appropriate to the assignment with mostly accurate grammar and spelling. Minor omissions only. Some-quality figures drawn using some tools and figures have some captions.
(1.30-1.49)
Writing style not always fluent or well organised and grammar and spelling contain errors. Poor-quality figures drawn using some tools and figures have some captions.
(1.00-1.29)
Writing style not fluent or well-organised, and many grammatical and spelling mistakes. Very bad quality figures, copied from others work, no captions.
(0.00-0.99)
Referencing and Citation
1 Marks
Referencing is mainly accurate and according to the APA standard. All references are cited in the text. (0.85-1.00) Referencing is mainly accurate and according to the APA standard. Most of the references are cited in the text.
(0.75-0.84)
Some attempt at referencing and according to the APA standard. Few references are cited in the text. (0.65-0.74) Attempt at referencing but not exactly according to APA standard and only few references are cited in the text. (0.50-0.64) Referencing is absent/ unsystematic.
(0.00-0.49)

PRESENTATION
back to top
Your answer for task 1 and task 2 should be around 2000 words (title page and references are not part of page count). You should use your own words and you can not use quotations.
REQUIREMENTS
back to top
If any references are required, ensure to use APA7 referencing to acknowledge the sources that you have used in preparing your assessment. Please refer to the CSU referencing guide http://student.csu.edu.au/study/referencing-at-csu. In addition a very useful tool for you to use that demonstrates how to correctly use in text referencing and the correct way to cite the reference in your reference list can be found at https://apps.csu.edu.au/reftool/apa-7

Order Now

Calculate a fair price for your paper

Such a cheap price for your free time and healthy sleep

1650 words
-
-
Place an order within a couple of minutes.
Get guaranteed assistance and 100% confidentiality.
Total price: $78
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, how can I help?