Asia Pacific International College Pty Ltd. Trading as Asia Pacific International College

Page | 7
Asia Pacific International College Pty Ltd. Trading as Asia Pacific International College
55 Regent Street, Chippendale, Sydney 2008: 02-9318 8111
PRV12007; CRICOS 03048D
Approved: DATE & Version
Assessment 3: Presentation
Due date: Week 10
Group/individual: Individual
Word count / Time provided: 10 minutes
Weighting: 20%
Unit Learning Outcomes: ULO 1, ULO2, ULO3, ULO4, ULO5, ULO6
Course Learning Outcomes: CLO-1, CLO-2, CLO-6, CLO-7, CLO-8
Graduate Attributes: GA9, GA-10, GA-11
Assessment Details:
The purpose of this assessment is to develop oral communication skill which is a valuable skill for
interview and future career. Student is required to select two topics that were taught in this unit and
prepare a presentation reflecting upon those selected topics. Your task in this presentation is to
reflect on those two topics based on your experiences and theories covered in the class.
Reflection is an opportunity for you to think about how your personal experiences and observations
influence what you think and how your thinking affects your decision as you progress in your study.
You will have to use DIEP (Describe, Interpret, Evaluate, Plan) formula to reflect on the following two
topics. Talk about the first topic by using DIEP formula and then progress to next topic and use DIEP
formula to reflect on the topics chosen. Students are expected to make presentation in PowerPoint
slides to provide clear, concise and precise information to persuade audience to accept a point of
view.
Page | 8
Asia Pacific International College Pty Ltd. Trading as Asia Pacific International College
55 Regent Street, Chippendale, Sydney 2008: 02-9318 8111
PRV12007; CRICOS 03048D
Approved: DATE & Version
Marking Criteria and Rubric: The Presentation will be marked out of 100 and will be weighted 20% of the total unit mark
Marking
Criteria
Not satisfactory
(0-49%) of the
criterion mark)
Satisfactory
(50-64%) of the criterion mark
Good
(65-74%) of the criterion mark
Very Good
(75-84%) of the criterion
mark
Excellent
(85-100%) of the criterion mark
Visual Appeal,
Systematised & organised
PowerPoint Slides (20
marks)
clarity, grammar, spelling
and engaging
Lack of evidence of visual
appeal. The slides were difficult
to read and too much
information had been copied
onto them.
There are many errors in
spelling, grammar and
punctuation.
Minimal effort made to make
slides appealing. Outline of the
presentation is missing. The slides
are too busy with much
information. Font size is small. No
figures incorporated
There are some errors in spelling,
grammar and punctuation. In
some slides, too much
information on two or more
slides.
Good visual appeal. Outline
presented. Some use of figures
and tables
There are few errors in
spelling, grammar and
punctuation. Very good visual
appeal. Outline is presented.
Good balance of text and
figure. Appropriate font size is
used.
There are no errors in spelling,
grammar and punctuation.
Information is clear and concise on
each slide.
Outline is presented. Good balance
of text and figure. Appropriate font
size used.
Excellent visually appeal that is
engaging.
Comprehension, clarity and
content of the presentation
(40 marks)
General knowledge of the
selected topics
Lack of evidence of
comprehensive knowledge in
the topic and reflective writing
Evidence of basic knowledge in
the topic and reflective writing
Has given a factual and/or
conceptual knowledge of the
topic and reflective writing
Reasonable knowledge of about
the topic and reflective writing.
Use of DIEP in the presentation.
Extensive comprehension
knowledge of topic and reflective
writing. Use of DIEP in the
presentation. Comprehensive and
complete coverage of information.
Presentation
Skills (40 marks) Oral
communication
skills
Lack of evidence of minimal
communication skills. Minimal
eye contact and focusing on
small part of audience. The
presenter did not get the
audience engaged.
Could not answer questions
Did not finish on time
Evidence of basic communication
skills. Minimal body language was
used by the presenters. Minimal
evidence of engaging the
audience.
Could not answer questions
Evidence of good oral
communication skills. Some
members spoke to majority of
audience, steady eye contact.
The audience was engaged by the
presentation.
Answered only few questions
confidently
spoke to majority of audience;
very good body language,
suitable volume speaking level,
regular eye contact. The
audience was engaged by the
presentation.
Manage to answer most of the
questions confidently
Has excellent skills in oral
communication. Excellent body
language, speaking volume &
regular eye contact.
The audience was engaged, and
presenters held the audience’s
attention.
Answered all questions confidently
Finished presentation on time
 
 
Order Now

Calculate a fair price for your paper

Such a cheap price for your free time and healthy sleep

1650 words
-
-
Place an order within a couple of minutes.
Get guaranteed assistance and 100% confidentiality.
Total price: $78
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, how can I help?